Criticality index of building systems using multi-criteria decision analysis technique

One of the most significant step in building structure maintenance decision is the physical inspection of the facility to be maintained. The physical inspection involved cursory assessment of the structure and ratings of the identified defects based on expert evaluation. The objective of this paper...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hammad, D.B., Shafiq, N., Nuruddin, M.F.
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Published: EDP Sciences 2014
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84906715684&doi=10.1051%2fmatecconf%2f20141501018&partnerID=40&md5=412ea1e93a2518f11e43c6efd953915c
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/32079/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utp.eprints.32079
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.320792022-03-29T04:34:11Z Criticality index of building systems using multi-criteria decision analysis technique Hammad, D.B. Shafiq, N. Nuruddin, M.F. One of the most significant step in building structure maintenance decision is the physical inspection of the facility to be maintained. The physical inspection involved cursory assessment of the structure and ratings of the identified defects based on expert evaluation. The objective of this paper is to describe present a novel approach to prioritizing the criticality of physical defects in a residential building system using multi criteria decision analysis approach. A residential building constructed in 1985 was considered in this study. Four criteria which includes; Physical Condition of the building system (PC), Effect on Asset (EA), effect on Occupants (EO) and Maintenance Cost (MC) are considered in the inspection. The building was divided in to nine systems regarded as alternatives. Expert's choice software was used in comparing the importance of the criteria against the main objective, whereas structured Proforma was used in quantifying the defects observed on all building systems against each criteria. The defects severity score of each building system was identified and later multiplied by the weight of the criteria and final hierarchy was derived. The final ranking indicates that, electrical system was considered the most critical system with a risk value of 0.134 while ceiling system scored the lowest risk value of 0.066. The technique is often used in prioritizing mechanical equipment for maintenance planning. However, result of this study indicates that the technique could be used in prioritizing building systems for maintenance planning © Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2014. EDP Sciences 2014 Conference or Workshop Item NonPeerReviewed https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84906715684&doi=10.1051%2fmatecconf%2f20141501018&partnerID=40&md5=412ea1e93a2518f11e43c6efd953915c Hammad, D.B. and Shafiq, N. and Nuruddin, M.F. (2014) Criticality index of building systems using multi-criteria decision analysis technique. In: UNSPECIFIED. http://eprints.utp.edu.my/32079/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
description One of the most significant step in building structure maintenance decision is the physical inspection of the facility to be maintained. The physical inspection involved cursory assessment of the structure and ratings of the identified defects based on expert evaluation. The objective of this paper is to describe present a novel approach to prioritizing the criticality of physical defects in a residential building system using multi criteria decision analysis approach. A residential building constructed in 1985 was considered in this study. Four criteria which includes; Physical Condition of the building system (PC), Effect on Asset (EA), effect on Occupants (EO) and Maintenance Cost (MC) are considered in the inspection. The building was divided in to nine systems regarded as alternatives. Expert's choice software was used in comparing the importance of the criteria against the main objective, whereas structured Proforma was used in quantifying the defects observed on all building systems against each criteria. The defects severity score of each building system was identified and later multiplied by the weight of the criteria and final hierarchy was derived. The final ranking indicates that, electrical system was considered the most critical system with a risk value of 0.134 while ceiling system scored the lowest risk value of 0.066. The technique is often used in prioritizing mechanical equipment for maintenance planning. However, result of this study indicates that the technique could be used in prioritizing building systems for maintenance planning © Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2014.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Hammad, D.B.
Shafiq, N.
Nuruddin, M.F.
spellingShingle Hammad, D.B.
Shafiq, N.
Nuruddin, M.F.
Criticality index of building systems using multi-criteria decision analysis technique
author_facet Hammad, D.B.
Shafiq, N.
Nuruddin, M.F.
author_sort Hammad, D.B.
title Criticality index of building systems using multi-criteria decision analysis technique
title_short Criticality index of building systems using multi-criteria decision analysis technique
title_full Criticality index of building systems using multi-criteria decision analysis technique
title_fullStr Criticality index of building systems using multi-criteria decision analysis technique
title_full_unstemmed Criticality index of building systems using multi-criteria decision analysis technique
title_sort criticality index of building systems using multi-criteria decision analysis technique
publisher EDP Sciences
publishDate 2014
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84906715684&doi=10.1051%2fmatecconf%2f20141501018&partnerID=40&md5=412ea1e93a2518f11e43c6efd953915c
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/32079/
_version_ 1738657337232588800
score 13.18916