Evaluation of digital speckle filters for ultrasound images

Ultrasound (US) images are inherently corrupted by speckle noise causing inaccuracy of medical diagnosis using this technique. Hence, numerous despeckling filters are used to denoise US images. However most of the despeckling techniques cause blurring to the US images. In this work, four filters nam...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Radzi, F.N., Yahya, N.
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Published: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2014
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84946688957&doi=10.1109%2fICCSCE.2014.7072741&partnerID=40&md5=ae38f1568c028cb45ddd71dab701aadd
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/31302/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utp.eprints.31302
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.313022022-03-25T09:05:39Z Evaluation of digital speckle filters for ultrasound images Radzi, F.N. Yahya, N. Ultrasound (US) images are inherently corrupted by speckle noise causing inaccuracy of medical diagnosis using this technique. Hence, numerous despeckling filters are used to denoise US images. However most of the despeckling techniques cause blurring to the US images. In this work, four filters namely Lee, Wavelet Linear Minimum Mean Square Error (LMMSE), Speckle-reduction Anisotropic Diffusion (SRAD) and Non-local-means (NLM) filters are evaluated in terms of their ability in noise removal. This is done through calculating four performance metrics Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Ultrasound Despeckling Assessment Index (USDSAI), Normalized Variance and Mean Preservation. The experiments were conducted on three different types of images which is simulated noise images, computer generated image and real US images. The evaluation in terms of PSNR, USDSAI, Normalized Variance and Mean Preservation shows that NLM filter is the best filter in all scenarios considering both speckle noise suppression and image restoration however with quite slow processing time. It may not be the best option of filter if speed is the priority during the image processing. Wavelet LMMSE filter is the next best performing filter after NLM filter with faster speed. © 2014 IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2014 Conference or Workshop Item NonPeerReviewed https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84946688957&doi=10.1109%2fICCSCE.2014.7072741&partnerID=40&md5=ae38f1568c028cb45ddd71dab701aadd Radzi, F.N. and Yahya, N. (2014) Evaluation of digital speckle filters for ultrasound images. In: UNSPECIFIED. http://eprints.utp.edu.my/31302/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
description Ultrasound (US) images are inherently corrupted by speckle noise causing inaccuracy of medical diagnosis using this technique. Hence, numerous despeckling filters are used to denoise US images. However most of the despeckling techniques cause blurring to the US images. In this work, four filters namely Lee, Wavelet Linear Minimum Mean Square Error (LMMSE), Speckle-reduction Anisotropic Diffusion (SRAD) and Non-local-means (NLM) filters are evaluated in terms of their ability in noise removal. This is done through calculating four performance metrics Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Ultrasound Despeckling Assessment Index (USDSAI), Normalized Variance and Mean Preservation. The experiments were conducted on three different types of images which is simulated noise images, computer generated image and real US images. The evaluation in terms of PSNR, USDSAI, Normalized Variance and Mean Preservation shows that NLM filter is the best filter in all scenarios considering both speckle noise suppression and image restoration however with quite slow processing time. It may not be the best option of filter if speed is the priority during the image processing. Wavelet LMMSE filter is the next best performing filter after NLM filter with faster speed. © 2014 IEEE.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Radzi, F.N.
Yahya, N.
spellingShingle Radzi, F.N.
Yahya, N.
Evaluation of digital speckle filters for ultrasound images
author_facet Radzi, F.N.
Yahya, N.
author_sort Radzi, F.N.
title Evaluation of digital speckle filters for ultrasound images
title_short Evaluation of digital speckle filters for ultrasound images
title_full Evaluation of digital speckle filters for ultrasound images
title_fullStr Evaluation of digital speckle filters for ultrasound images
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of digital speckle filters for ultrasound images
title_sort evaluation of digital speckle filters for ultrasound images
publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
publishDate 2014
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84946688957&doi=10.1109%2fICCSCE.2014.7072741&partnerID=40&md5=ae38f1568c028cb45ddd71dab701aadd
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/31302/
_version_ 1738657228527763456
score 13.160551