Conventional and intelligent models for detection and prediction of fluid loss events during drilling operations: A comprehensive review

Fluid loss to subsurface formations is a challenging aspect during drilling operations in petroleum industry. Several other drilling issues such as fluid influx and pipe sticking can be triggered in such scenarios, posturing a significant risk to rig personnel, environment, and economical drilling....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Krishna, S., Ridha, S., Vasant, P., Ilyas, S.U., Sophian, A.
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier B.V. 2020
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85090552029&doi=10.1016%2fj.petrol.2020.107818&partnerID=40&md5=89d4074774724b5f9e8a354d0a807818
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/29724/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utp.eprints.29724
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.297242022-03-25T02:45:34Z Conventional and intelligent models for detection and prediction of fluid loss events during drilling operations: A comprehensive review Krishna, S. Ridha, S. Vasant, P. Ilyas, S.U. Sophian, A. Fluid loss to subsurface formations is a challenging aspect during drilling operations in petroleum industry. Several other drilling issues such as fluid influx and pipe sticking can be triggered in such scenarios, posturing a significant risk to rig personnel, environment, and economical drilling. Therefore, prediction and early detection of lost circulation events are required for safe and economic drilling operation. Several theoretical studies have been performed to detect and predict fluid loss event during hydrocarbon extraction. This paper reviews the existing conventional and intelligent models developed for early detection and prediction of lost circulation events. These predictive and detecting models comprise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms that require improvements for data reduction, universal prediction and compatibility. The review also covers several sensor-based techniques, different geostatistical-based models and Pressure-While-Drilling (PWD) tools for their applications in early loss circulation detection. In addition, loss circulation zones types, severity level, scenario and common preventive measures are also included in this review. This study aims to provide a systematic review of the published literature from the last forty years on the developed conventional and intelligent models for detection and prediction of fluid loss events and emphasizes on increasing AI involvement for precise results. © 2020 Elsevier B.V. Elsevier B.V. 2020 Article NonPeerReviewed https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85090552029&doi=10.1016%2fj.petrol.2020.107818&partnerID=40&md5=89d4074774724b5f9e8a354d0a807818 Krishna, S. and Ridha, S. and Vasant, P. and Ilyas, S.U. and Sophian, A. (2020) Conventional and intelligent models for detection and prediction of fluid loss events during drilling operations: A comprehensive review. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 195 . http://eprints.utp.edu.my/29724/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
description Fluid loss to subsurface formations is a challenging aspect during drilling operations in petroleum industry. Several other drilling issues such as fluid influx and pipe sticking can be triggered in such scenarios, posturing a significant risk to rig personnel, environment, and economical drilling. Therefore, prediction and early detection of lost circulation events are required for safe and economic drilling operation. Several theoretical studies have been performed to detect and predict fluid loss event during hydrocarbon extraction. This paper reviews the existing conventional and intelligent models developed for early detection and prediction of lost circulation events. These predictive and detecting models comprise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms that require improvements for data reduction, universal prediction and compatibility. The review also covers several sensor-based techniques, different geostatistical-based models and Pressure-While-Drilling (PWD) tools for their applications in early loss circulation detection. In addition, loss circulation zones types, severity level, scenario and common preventive measures are also included in this review. This study aims to provide a systematic review of the published literature from the last forty years on the developed conventional and intelligent models for detection and prediction of fluid loss events and emphasizes on increasing AI involvement for precise results. © 2020 Elsevier B.V.
format Article
author Krishna, S.
Ridha, S.
Vasant, P.
Ilyas, S.U.
Sophian, A.
spellingShingle Krishna, S.
Ridha, S.
Vasant, P.
Ilyas, S.U.
Sophian, A.
Conventional and intelligent models for detection and prediction of fluid loss events during drilling operations: A comprehensive review
author_facet Krishna, S.
Ridha, S.
Vasant, P.
Ilyas, S.U.
Sophian, A.
author_sort Krishna, S.
title Conventional and intelligent models for detection and prediction of fluid loss events during drilling operations: A comprehensive review
title_short Conventional and intelligent models for detection and prediction of fluid loss events during drilling operations: A comprehensive review
title_full Conventional and intelligent models for detection and prediction of fluid loss events during drilling operations: A comprehensive review
title_fullStr Conventional and intelligent models for detection and prediction of fluid loss events during drilling operations: A comprehensive review
title_full_unstemmed Conventional and intelligent models for detection and prediction of fluid loss events during drilling operations: A comprehensive review
title_sort conventional and intelligent models for detection and prediction of fluid loss events during drilling operations: a comprehensive review
publisher Elsevier B.V.
publishDate 2020
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85090552029&doi=10.1016%2fj.petrol.2020.107818&partnerID=40&md5=89d4074774724b5f9e8a354d0a807818
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/29724/
_version_ 1738657006629158912
score 13.160551