Comparative Study on Behavior of Self Compacting Concrete (SCC) under Dynamic Loading at Different Loading Ranges

This paper reports the results of a continued study of a parallel research conducted on the behavior of SCC under static load at different loading rates. Self compacting concrete was developed in 1980s to improve the performance of concrete in its fresh state with the fundamental purpose to enhance...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamed , M.A.W., Nabilah , A.B., Shah Haeqal, S.A., Kalaikumar, V.
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utp.edu.my/2802/1/SBI-O4-MS-09.pdf
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/2802/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utp.eprints.2802
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.28022017-01-19T08:24:02Z Comparative Study on Behavior of Self Compacting Concrete (SCC) under Dynamic Loading at Different Loading Ranges Mohamed , M.A.W. Nabilah , A.B. Shah Haeqal, S.A. Kalaikumar, V. TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) This paper reports the results of a continued study of a parallel research conducted on the behavior of SCC under static load at different loading rates. Self compacting concrete was developed in 1980s to improve the performance of concrete in its fresh state with the fundamental purpose to enhance its flowability, self compacting ability and segregation resistance capability. In this study, SCC and normally compacted concrete (NC) mixes were designed to be tested on the fresh and hardened properties. Concrete cubes were casted for both mixes. Also three (3) pairs of beams each made from both mixes were made and subjected to three (3) different dynamic loading ranges of 40%-10%, 60%-10% and 85%-10%; all load ranges were based on the ultimate static failure load from the parallel study. Cube compressive strength, beam crack pattern and deflection rates were obtained and compared for both types of concrete. It’s found that the fatigue and ductility strength of SCC beams were higher than the NC beams. As conclusion the SCC showed a better result compared to the NC. The SCC has higher ductility than the NC where the earlier could withstand similar amount of dynamic load with generating high values of deflection. Also in fatigue test, the SCC sustained a longer cycles of loading. Meanwhile the SCC showed higher magnitude of deformation than the later. On the crack pattern, the SCC developed lesser number of cracks than NC in respective loading ranges. 2010-06-15 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf http://eprints.utp.edu.my/2802/1/SBI-O4-MS-09.pdf Mohamed , M.A.W. and Nabilah , A.B. and Shah Haeqal, S.A. and Kalaikumar, V. (2010) Comparative Study on Behavior of Self Compacting Concrete (SCC) under Dynamic Loading at Different Loading Ranges. In: ICSBI 2010, part of ESTCON 2010, 15-17 June 2010, Kuala Lumpur. http://eprints.utp.edu.my/2802/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Mohamed , M.A.W.
Nabilah , A.B.
Shah Haeqal, S.A.
Kalaikumar, V.
Comparative Study on Behavior of Self Compacting Concrete (SCC) under Dynamic Loading at Different Loading Ranges
description This paper reports the results of a continued study of a parallel research conducted on the behavior of SCC under static load at different loading rates. Self compacting concrete was developed in 1980s to improve the performance of concrete in its fresh state with the fundamental purpose to enhance its flowability, self compacting ability and segregation resistance capability. In this study, SCC and normally compacted concrete (NC) mixes were designed to be tested on the fresh and hardened properties. Concrete cubes were casted for both mixes. Also three (3) pairs of beams each made from both mixes were made and subjected to three (3) different dynamic loading ranges of 40%-10%, 60%-10% and 85%-10%; all load ranges were based on the ultimate static failure load from the parallel study. Cube compressive strength, beam crack pattern and deflection rates were obtained and compared for both types of concrete. It’s found that the fatigue and ductility strength of SCC beams were higher than the NC beams. As conclusion the SCC showed a better result compared to the NC. The SCC has higher ductility than the NC where the earlier could withstand similar amount of dynamic load with generating high values of deflection. Also in fatigue test, the SCC sustained a longer cycles of loading. Meanwhile the SCC showed higher magnitude of deformation than the later. On the crack pattern, the SCC developed lesser number of cracks than NC in respective loading ranges.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Mohamed , M.A.W.
Nabilah , A.B.
Shah Haeqal, S.A.
Kalaikumar, V.
author_facet Mohamed , M.A.W.
Nabilah , A.B.
Shah Haeqal, S.A.
Kalaikumar, V.
author_sort Mohamed , M.A.W.
title Comparative Study on Behavior of Self Compacting Concrete (SCC) under Dynamic Loading at Different Loading Ranges
title_short Comparative Study on Behavior of Self Compacting Concrete (SCC) under Dynamic Loading at Different Loading Ranges
title_full Comparative Study on Behavior of Self Compacting Concrete (SCC) under Dynamic Loading at Different Loading Ranges
title_fullStr Comparative Study on Behavior of Self Compacting Concrete (SCC) under Dynamic Loading at Different Loading Ranges
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study on Behavior of Self Compacting Concrete (SCC) under Dynamic Loading at Different Loading Ranges
title_sort comparative study on behavior of self compacting concrete (scc) under dynamic loading at different loading ranges
publishDate 2010
url http://eprints.utp.edu.my/2802/1/SBI-O4-MS-09.pdf
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/2802/
_version_ 1738655223266672640
score 13.209306