Smith Predictor-based Controllers for Temperature Process with Time Delay

Smith Predictor (SP) control structure is usually developed around a proportional-integral (PI) controller to improve the performance of processes with time delay. However, this technique has shortcomings as it depends on the exact representation of the process model, does not guarantee robustness a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iampita, I.M., Hisham, S.B.
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Published: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2019
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075634063&doi=10.1109%2fSCORED.2019.8896245&partnerID=40&md5=3765fbfa1413aff0ec146b4ea0a7c255
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/24904/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utp.eprints.24904
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.249042021-08-27T06:37:00Z Smith Predictor-based Controllers for Temperature Process with Time Delay Iampita, I.M. Hisham, S.B. Smith Predictor (SP) control structure is usually developed around a proportional-integral (PI) controller to improve the performance of processes with time delay. However, this technique has shortcomings as it depends on the exact representation of the process model, does not guarantee robustness and it is sensitive to process delay variation. A temperature control experiment is conducted on a shell-tube heat exchanger due to its time delay presence characteristic. A process model is obtained through a statistical modelling identification. Using Matlab/Simulink to simulate the control of the temperature process loop, a PI and Smith Predictor-PI (SP-PI) controllers are developed and compared to prove the effectiveness of the latter. Later both controllers are compared to a Filtered Smith Predictor (FSP) to offer benchmark comparison. Investigation is conducted on the ability of the SP-PI and FSP control structures to robustly control a temperature feedback loop when the process time delay is varied and results show that they are both efficient. Moreover, limits to reducing the effects caused by time delay are dependent on the choice of robust element value and sampling time choice for the SP-PI and FSP structures respectively. The control performance of both structures are compared using indicators such as Integral Absolute Error (IAE), Integral Squared Error (ISE), settling time, rise time and overshoot. © 2019 IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2019 Conference or Workshop Item NonPeerReviewed https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075634063&doi=10.1109%2fSCORED.2019.8896245&partnerID=40&md5=3765fbfa1413aff0ec146b4ea0a7c255 Iampita, I.M. and Hisham, S.B. (2019) Smith Predictor-based Controllers for Temperature Process with Time Delay. In: UNSPECIFIED. http://eprints.utp.edu.my/24904/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
description Smith Predictor (SP) control structure is usually developed around a proportional-integral (PI) controller to improve the performance of processes with time delay. However, this technique has shortcomings as it depends on the exact representation of the process model, does not guarantee robustness and it is sensitive to process delay variation. A temperature control experiment is conducted on a shell-tube heat exchanger due to its time delay presence characteristic. A process model is obtained through a statistical modelling identification. Using Matlab/Simulink to simulate the control of the temperature process loop, a PI and Smith Predictor-PI (SP-PI) controllers are developed and compared to prove the effectiveness of the latter. Later both controllers are compared to a Filtered Smith Predictor (FSP) to offer benchmark comparison. Investigation is conducted on the ability of the SP-PI and FSP control structures to robustly control a temperature feedback loop when the process time delay is varied and results show that they are both efficient. Moreover, limits to reducing the effects caused by time delay are dependent on the choice of robust element value and sampling time choice for the SP-PI and FSP structures respectively. The control performance of both structures are compared using indicators such as Integral Absolute Error (IAE), Integral Squared Error (ISE), settling time, rise time and overshoot. © 2019 IEEE.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Iampita, I.M.
Hisham, S.B.
spellingShingle Iampita, I.M.
Hisham, S.B.
Smith Predictor-based Controllers for Temperature Process with Time Delay
author_facet Iampita, I.M.
Hisham, S.B.
author_sort Iampita, I.M.
title Smith Predictor-based Controllers for Temperature Process with Time Delay
title_short Smith Predictor-based Controllers for Temperature Process with Time Delay
title_full Smith Predictor-based Controllers for Temperature Process with Time Delay
title_fullStr Smith Predictor-based Controllers for Temperature Process with Time Delay
title_full_unstemmed Smith Predictor-based Controllers for Temperature Process with Time Delay
title_sort smith predictor-based controllers for temperature process with time delay
publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
publishDate 2019
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075634063&doi=10.1109%2fSCORED.2019.8896245&partnerID=40&md5=3765fbfa1413aff0ec146b4ea0a7c255
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/24904/
_version_ 1738656655743123456
score 13.214268