Nonlinear ROV modelling and control system design using adaptive U-model, FLC and PID control approaches

This paper presents the development of remotely operated vehicle (ROV) control modelling and control synthesis using nonlinear adaptive U-model and compares it with the proportional-integralderivative (PID) control and fuzzy logic control (FLC) approaches. A nonlinear ROV model based on dynamic equa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hussain, N.A.A., Ali, S.S.A., Saad, M.N.M., Ovinis, M.
Format: Article
Published: Science and Technology Research Institute for Defence 2018
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85044829464&partnerID=40&md5=ad56437e75ca278a92f55c65e85ed37d
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/21300/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utp.eprints.21300
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.213002019-02-26T03:17:46Z Nonlinear ROV modelling and control system design using adaptive U-model, FLC and PID control approaches Hussain, N.A.A. Ali, S.S.A. Saad, M.N.M. Ovinis, M. This paper presents the development of remotely operated vehicle (ROV) control modelling and control synthesis using nonlinear adaptive U-model and compares it with the proportional-integralderivative (PID) control and fuzzy logic control (FLC) approaches. A nonlinear ROV model based on dynamic equations using the Newtonian method, and derivation towards kinematics equations and rigid-body mass matrixes are explained. This nonlinear ROV model represents the underwater thruster dynamics, ROV dynamics and kinematics related to the earth-fixed frame. Multivariable nonlinear adaptive control synthesis using the U-model approach incorporated with radial basis function (RBF) neural networks along with the PID and FLC approaches are implemented using MATLAB� Simulink and integrated with the nonlinear ROV model. Simulations are carried in six degree of freedom (DoF) manoeuvring position in x, y, z coordinates from (0,0,0) to (5,5,1), with the final reference position at (10,10,2). All three controllers are compared and analysed in terms of control synthesis and model tracking capabilities without external disturbances intervention. The simulations are then done with external disturbances intervention for the nonlinear ROV model and the control performances are analysed. The results show good control signal convergence and tracking performance using the U-model control approach. © Science & Technology Research Institute for Defence (STRIDE), 2018. Science and Technology Research Institute for Defence 2018 Article NonPeerReviewed https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85044829464&partnerID=40&md5=ad56437e75ca278a92f55c65e85ed37d Hussain, N.A.A. and Ali, S.S.A. and Saad, M.N.M. and Ovinis, M. (2018) Nonlinear ROV modelling and control system design using adaptive U-model, FLC and PID control approaches. Defence S and T Technical Bulletin, 11 (1). pp. 77-89. http://eprints.utp.edu.my/21300/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
description This paper presents the development of remotely operated vehicle (ROV) control modelling and control synthesis using nonlinear adaptive U-model and compares it with the proportional-integralderivative (PID) control and fuzzy logic control (FLC) approaches. A nonlinear ROV model based on dynamic equations using the Newtonian method, and derivation towards kinematics equations and rigid-body mass matrixes are explained. This nonlinear ROV model represents the underwater thruster dynamics, ROV dynamics and kinematics related to the earth-fixed frame. Multivariable nonlinear adaptive control synthesis using the U-model approach incorporated with radial basis function (RBF) neural networks along with the PID and FLC approaches are implemented using MATLAB� Simulink and integrated with the nonlinear ROV model. Simulations are carried in six degree of freedom (DoF) manoeuvring position in x, y, z coordinates from (0,0,0) to (5,5,1), with the final reference position at (10,10,2). All three controllers are compared and analysed in terms of control synthesis and model tracking capabilities without external disturbances intervention. The simulations are then done with external disturbances intervention for the nonlinear ROV model and the control performances are analysed. The results show good control signal convergence and tracking performance using the U-model control approach. © Science & Technology Research Institute for Defence (STRIDE), 2018.
format Article
author Hussain, N.A.A.
Ali, S.S.A.
Saad, M.N.M.
Ovinis, M.
spellingShingle Hussain, N.A.A.
Ali, S.S.A.
Saad, M.N.M.
Ovinis, M.
Nonlinear ROV modelling and control system design using adaptive U-model, FLC and PID control approaches
author_facet Hussain, N.A.A.
Ali, S.S.A.
Saad, M.N.M.
Ovinis, M.
author_sort Hussain, N.A.A.
title Nonlinear ROV modelling and control system design using adaptive U-model, FLC and PID control approaches
title_short Nonlinear ROV modelling and control system design using adaptive U-model, FLC and PID control approaches
title_full Nonlinear ROV modelling and control system design using adaptive U-model, FLC and PID control approaches
title_fullStr Nonlinear ROV modelling and control system design using adaptive U-model, FLC and PID control approaches
title_full_unstemmed Nonlinear ROV modelling and control system design using adaptive U-model, FLC and PID control approaches
title_sort nonlinear rov modelling and control system design using adaptive u-model, flc and pid control approaches
publisher Science and Technology Research Institute for Defence
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85044829464&partnerID=40&md5=ad56437e75ca278a92f55c65e85ed37d
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/21300/
_version_ 1738656270042267648
score 13.211869