Evaluations of thermocline and half cycle figure of merit of a thermal energy storage tank

Two main criteria that are commonly used to evaluate thermal energy storage systems are thermocline thickness and half cycle figure of merit. For the thermocline thickness, the preference is to achieve as thin as possible the thermocline thickness. While the preference for half cycle figure of merit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abd Majid, M.A., Kar Kin, L.
Format: Article
Published: EDP Sciences 2017
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85033212287&doi=10.1051%2fmatecconf%2f201713101010&partnerID=40&md5=a327936734452c61c69f07c39b7f789c
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/19948/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utp.eprints.19948
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.199482018-04-22T14:26:43Z Evaluations of thermocline and half cycle figure of merit of a thermal energy storage tank Abd Majid, M.A. Kar Kin, L. Two main criteria that are commonly used to evaluate thermal energy storage systems are thermocline thickness and half cycle figure of merit. For the thermocline thickness, the preference is to achieve as thin as possible the thermocline thickness. While the preference for half cycle figure of merit is to achieve the value of greater than 90 per cent. These two criteria were used to evaluate a thermal storage system at University Teknologi PETRONAS district cooling plant. The capacity of the thermal energy storage tank of the plant is 10,000 RTh. Operating data was used for the evaluation. The values of evaluated thermocline thickness ranges from 2.248 meters to 5.445 meters with an average of 3.251 meters. These values are very much higher in comparison to findings of other studies. One possible reason is due to higher flow rates. For the half cycle figure of merit the evaluated values ranges from 0.9469 to 0.9847, with the average of 0.9698, which are within the acceptable range. For future work a model should be developed which could automatically evaluate both the thermocline thickness and half cycle figure of merit. This would enable both of these parameters to be continuously evaluated. © The authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2017. EDP Sciences 2017 Article PeerReviewed https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85033212287&doi=10.1051%2fmatecconf%2f201713101010&partnerID=40&md5=a327936734452c61c69f07c39b7f789c Abd Majid, M.A. and Kar Kin, L. (2017) Evaluations of thermocline and half cycle figure of merit of a thermal energy storage tank. MATEC Web of Conferences, 131 . http://eprints.utp.edu.my/19948/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
description Two main criteria that are commonly used to evaluate thermal energy storage systems are thermocline thickness and half cycle figure of merit. For the thermocline thickness, the preference is to achieve as thin as possible the thermocline thickness. While the preference for half cycle figure of merit is to achieve the value of greater than 90 per cent. These two criteria were used to evaluate a thermal storage system at University Teknologi PETRONAS district cooling plant. The capacity of the thermal energy storage tank of the plant is 10,000 RTh. Operating data was used for the evaluation. The values of evaluated thermocline thickness ranges from 2.248 meters to 5.445 meters with an average of 3.251 meters. These values are very much higher in comparison to findings of other studies. One possible reason is due to higher flow rates. For the half cycle figure of merit the evaluated values ranges from 0.9469 to 0.9847, with the average of 0.9698, which are within the acceptable range. For future work a model should be developed which could automatically evaluate both the thermocline thickness and half cycle figure of merit. This would enable both of these parameters to be continuously evaluated. © The authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2017.
format Article
author Abd Majid, M.A.
Kar Kin, L.
spellingShingle Abd Majid, M.A.
Kar Kin, L.
Evaluations of thermocline and half cycle figure of merit of a thermal energy storage tank
author_facet Abd Majid, M.A.
Kar Kin, L.
author_sort Abd Majid, M.A.
title Evaluations of thermocline and half cycle figure of merit of a thermal energy storage tank
title_short Evaluations of thermocline and half cycle figure of merit of a thermal energy storage tank
title_full Evaluations of thermocline and half cycle figure of merit of a thermal energy storage tank
title_fullStr Evaluations of thermocline and half cycle figure of merit of a thermal energy storage tank
title_full_unstemmed Evaluations of thermocline and half cycle figure of merit of a thermal energy storage tank
title_sort evaluations of thermocline and half cycle figure of merit of a thermal energy storage tank
publisher EDP Sciences
publishDate 2017
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85033212287&doi=10.1051%2fmatecconf%2f201713101010&partnerID=40&md5=a327936734452c61c69f07c39b7f789c
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/19948/
_version_ 1738656142082441216
score 13.214268