2D and 3D seismic simulation for fault modeling: exploratory revision from the Gullfaks field

2D and 3D seismic data have emerged as a key tool in the oil and gas industry to visualize and understand subsurface morphology and boundaries. In addition to providing excellent structural images, the dense sampling of 2D and 3D survey can sometimes make it possible to map reservoir quality and the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siddiqui, N.A., Mathew, M.J., Menier, D., Hassaan, M.
Format: Article
Published: Springer Verlag 2017
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85019554616&doi=10.1007%2fs13202-016-0301-3&partnerID=40&md5=200cccc0ca28fa62bccdd54c46c3f06f
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/19485/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utp.eprints.19485
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.194852018-04-20T06:01:45Z 2D and 3D seismic simulation for fault modeling: exploratory revision from the Gullfaks field Siddiqui, N.A. Mathew, M.J. Menier, D. Hassaan, M. 2D and 3D seismic data have emerged as a key tool in the oil and gas industry to visualize and understand subsurface morphology and boundaries. In addition to providing excellent structural images, the dense sampling of 2D and 3D survey can sometimes make it possible to map reservoir quality and the distribution of hydrocarbon with well-marked limitations. Here we use 2D and 3D seismic data to map and interpret basic structures and fault lines to construct 2D and 3D base fault models of the Gullfaks field, while avoiding common pitfalls. This work also highlights important concepts and principles that allow selection, interpretation and simulation of particular areas containing hydrocarbon traps through the comparison of different maps such as time structure, amplitude and coherence. The field covers an area of approximately 50 km2 entirely confined within block 34/10 in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea. The area of the seismic lines extends to 4875 m laterally and vertically up to 4.5 s. Based on all the selected horizons, constructed maps and dominant fault construction models (2D and 3D), we show the presence of a major fault that cuts five horizons of the area of interest. The structural features include antiform and a set of extensional faults with master, antithetic and synthetic faults with opposite sense of shear (dip direction and angle ~60°). Ductile deformation at the bottom of seismic lines shows the fluctuation of amplitude of acoustic signals in seismic lines. Our results demonstrate uplift along the major fault during extension indicated by chaotic distortion at the bottom, which reveals a gas trap. In the Gullfaks field, termination of fault movement and subsequent deformation appears to have occurred for a long period of time. This illustrates the use of 2D and 3D visualization with horizon attributes that can conveniently provide massive amounts of data which elucidates the trapping mechanism of faults. © 2016, The Author(s). Springer Verlag 2017 Article PeerReviewed https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85019554616&doi=10.1007%2fs13202-016-0301-3&partnerID=40&md5=200cccc0ca28fa62bccdd54c46c3f06f Siddiqui, N.A. and Mathew, M.J. and Menier, D. and Hassaan, M. (2017) 2D and 3D seismic simulation for fault modeling: exploratory revision from the Gullfaks field. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 7 (2). pp. 417-432. http://eprints.utp.edu.my/19485/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
description 2D and 3D seismic data have emerged as a key tool in the oil and gas industry to visualize and understand subsurface morphology and boundaries. In addition to providing excellent structural images, the dense sampling of 2D and 3D survey can sometimes make it possible to map reservoir quality and the distribution of hydrocarbon with well-marked limitations. Here we use 2D and 3D seismic data to map and interpret basic structures and fault lines to construct 2D and 3D base fault models of the Gullfaks field, while avoiding common pitfalls. This work also highlights important concepts and principles that allow selection, interpretation and simulation of particular areas containing hydrocarbon traps through the comparison of different maps such as time structure, amplitude and coherence. The field covers an area of approximately 50 km2 entirely confined within block 34/10 in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea. The area of the seismic lines extends to 4875 m laterally and vertically up to 4.5 s. Based on all the selected horizons, constructed maps and dominant fault construction models (2D and 3D), we show the presence of a major fault that cuts five horizons of the area of interest. The structural features include antiform and a set of extensional faults with master, antithetic and synthetic faults with opposite sense of shear (dip direction and angle ~60°). Ductile deformation at the bottom of seismic lines shows the fluctuation of amplitude of acoustic signals in seismic lines. Our results demonstrate uplift along the major fault during extension indicated by chaotic distortion at the bottom, which reveals a gas trap. In the Gullfaks field, termination of fault movement and subsequent deformation appears to have occurred for a long period of time. This illustrates the use of 2D and 3D visualization with horizon attributes that can conveniently provide massive amounts of data which elucidates the trapping mechanism of faults. © 2016, The Author(s).
format Article
author Siddiqui, N.A.
Mathew, M.J.
Menier, D.
Hassaan, M.
spellingShingle Siddiqui, N.A.
Mathew, M.J.
Menier, D.
Hassaan, M.
2D and 3D seismic simulation for fault modeling: exploratory revision from the Gullfaks field
author_facet Siddiqui, N.A.
Mathew, M.J.
Menier, D.
Hassaan, M.
author_sort Siddiqui, N.A.
title 2D and 3D seismic simulation for fault modeling: exploratory revision from the Gullfaks field
title_short 2D and 3D seismic simulation for fault modeling: exploratory revision from the Gullfaks field
title_full 2D and 3D seismic simulation for fault modeling: exploratory revision from the Gullfaks field
title_fullStr 2D and 3D seismic simulation for fault modeling: exploratory revision from the Gullfaks field
title_full_unstemmed 2D and 3D seismic simulation for fault modeling: exploratory revision from the Gullfaks field
title_sort 2d and 3d seismic simulation for fault modeling: exploratory revision from the gullfaks field
publisher Springer Verlag
publishDate 2017
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85019554616&doi=10.1007%2fs13202-016-0301-3&partnerID=40&md5=200cccc0ca28fa62bccdd54c46c3f06f
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/19485/
_version_ 1738656076872548352
score 13.214268