Comparison of Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWNTs) and Activated Carbon (AC) as Adsorbents in Heavy Metal Adsorption

The present study was undertaken to investigate the ability of granulated charcoal activated carbon (AC) and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) as adsorbents in adsorption process of removing heavy metals from aqueous solutions. The analyses of heavy metal removal are performed on three opera...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamad Shah , Nurul Syafiqin, Zaina Abidin, Noor Azurah, Sufian, Suriati, Ku Shaari, Ku Zilati
Format: Citation Index Journal
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utp.edu.my/10223/1/AIP%20Feqinn.pdf
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/10223/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utp.eprints.10223
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.102232013-10-25T01:56:56Z Comparison of Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWNTs) and Activated Carbon (AC) as Adsorbents in Heavy Metal Adsorption Mohamad Shah , Nurul Syafiqin Zaina Abidin, Noor Azurah Sufian, Suriati Ku Shaari, Ku Zilati Q Science (General) The present study was undertaken to investigate the ability of granulated charcoal activated carbon (AC) and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) as adsorbents in adsorption process of removing heavy metals from aqueous solutions. The analyses of heavy metal removal are performed on three operational parameters which are agitation time, initial ion concentration and pH. The experiments were carried out at room temperature (25oC) and metal solutions were agitated on a rotary shaker at constant speed range between 200 to 240 rpm. BET surface area of AC and MWNTs were found to be 898 m²/g and 213 m²/g, respectively. Metals adsorptions by both adsorbents were well fitted to Freundlich isotherm. Batch adsorption test showed that metal uptake increases as agitation time increases which are the optimum time are 3 hours and 4 hours by using AC and MWNTs, respectively. Cadmium adsorption by both adsorbents showed the same behaviour where as initial metal ion concentration increases, cadmium adsorption percentage increases. As for nickel, when using AC as adsorbent, as the initial ion concentration increases, the nickel adsorption percentage decreases.Adsorption was found to be low at acidic pH and kept on increasing as pH increased. 2012 Citation Index Journal PeerReviewed application/pdf http://eprints.utp.edu.my/10223/1/AIP%20Feqinn.pdf Mohamad Shah , Nurul Syafiqin and Zaina Abidin, Noor Azurah and Sufian, Suriati and Ku Shaari, Ku Zilati (2012) Comparison of Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWNTs) and Activated Carbon (AC) as Adsorbents in Heavy Metal Adsorption. [Citation Index Journal] http://eprints.utp.edu.my/10223/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
topic Q Science (General)
spellingShingle Q Science (General)
Mohamad Shah , Nurul Syafiqin
Zaina Abidin, Noor Azurah
Sufian, Suriati
Ku Shaari, Ku Zilati
Comparison of Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWNTs) and Activated Carbon (AC) as Adsorbents in Heavy Metal Adsorption
description The present study was undertaken to investigate the ability of granulated charcoal activated carbon (AC) and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) as adsorbents in adsorption process of removing heavy metals from aqueous solutions. The analyses of heavy metal removal are performed on three operational parameters which are agitation time, initial ion concentration and pH. The experiments were carried out at room temperature (25oC) and metal solutions were agitated on a rotary shaker at constant speed range between 200 to 240 rpm. BET surface area of AC and MWNTs were found to be 898 m²/g and 213 m²/g, respectively. Metals adsorptions by both adsorbents were well fitted to Freundlich isotherm. Batch adsorption test showed that metal uptake increases as agitation time increases which are the optimum time are 3 hours and 4 hours by using AC and MWNTs, respectively. Cadmium adsorption by both adsorbents showed the same behaviour where as initial metal ion concentration increases, cadmium adsorption percentage increases. As for nickel, when using AC as adsorbent, as the initial ion concentration increases, the nickel adsorption percentage decreases.Adsorption was found to be low at acidic pH and kept on increasing as pH increased.
format Citation Index Journal
author Mohamad Shah , Nurul Syafiqin
Zaina Abidin, Noor Azurah
Sufian, Suriati
Ku Shaari, Ku Zilati
author_facet Mohamad Shah , Nurul Syafiqin
Zaina Abidin, Noor Azurah
Sufian, Suriati
Ku Shaari, Ku Zilati
author_sort Mohamad Shah , Nurul Syafiqin
title Comparison of Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWNTs) and Activated Carbon (AC) as Adsorbents in Heavy Metal Adsorption
title_short Comparison of Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWNTs) and Activated Carbon (AC) as Adsorbents in Heavy Metal Adsorption
title_full Comparison of Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWNTs) and Activated Carbon (AC) as Adsorbents in Heavy Metal Adsorption
title_fullStr Comparison of Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWNTs) and Activated Carbon (AC) as Adsorbents in Heavy Metal Adsorption
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWNTs) and Activated Carbon (AC) as Adsorbents in Heavy Metal Adsorption
title_sort comparison of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (mwnts) and activated carbon (ac) as adsorbents in heavy metal adsorption
publishDate 2012
url http://eprints.utp.edu.my/10223/1/AIP%20Feqinn.pdf
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/10223/
_version_ 1738655825837162496
score 13.213126