Forecasting performance of mixed data sampling (MIDAS) regressions, autoregressive distributed lag (ADL) model and hybrid of GARCH-MIDAS model: a comparative study

This paper considers the Comparison of forecasting performance between Mixed Data sampling (MIDAS) Regressions model, Autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) Model and hybrid of GARCH-MIDAS. The data employed for this study was secondary type in nature for all the variables and it is obtained from the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bawa, M. U., Shabri, Anil, Dikko, H. G., Garba, J., Sadiku, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMPES 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/97762/1/AnilShabri2021_ForecastingPerformance0fMixedDataSampling.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/97762/
https://www.mathematicaljournal.com/archives/2021.v2.i1.A.19
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.97762
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.977622022-10-31T08:18:56Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/97762/ Forecasting performance of mixed data sampling (MIDAS) regressions, autoregressive distributed lag (ADL) model and hybrid of GARCH-MIDAS model: a comparative study Bawa, M. U. Shabri, Anil Dikko, H. G. Garba, J. Sadiku, S. QA Mathematics This paper considers the Comparison of forecasting performance between Mixed Data sampling (MIDAS) Regressions model, Autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) Model and hybrid of GARCH-MIDAS. The data employed for this study was secondary type in nature for all the variables and it is obtained from the publications of Central Bank of Nigerian bulletin, National Bureau of Statistics and World Bank Statistics Database dated, January, 2005 to Dec, 2019. The result of unit root test shows that all variables are stationary at level and after first differences at 5% level of significant. From the results we found that F-statistics 1.895554 is inside the regions defined as the lower and upper bound (3.62 and 4.16) at 5% level of significant, this implies that there’s no long-run relationship between dependent variable (NSE) and independent Variable (CC). using forecasting evaluations with shows that that GARCH-MIDAS has a least value of RMSE and MAPE than ARDL and MIDAS model (1823.531 and 3.976542) is least than for MIDAS and Ardl models (2372.846, 4.765421 and 2134.732, 5.952348). Finally, we can conclude that GARCH- MIDAS model outperform MIDAS and ARDL models of Nigeria Stock Exchange. JMPES 2021 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/97762/1/AnilShabri2021_ForecastingPerformance0fMixedDataSampling.pdf Bawa, M. U. and Shabri, Anil and Dikko, H. G. and Garba, J. and Sadiku, S. (2021) Forecasting performance of mixed data sampling (MIDAS) regressions, autoregressive distributed lag (ADL) model and hybrid of GARCH-MIDAS model: a comparative study. Journal of Mathematical Problems, Equations and Statistics, 2 (1). pp. 27-35. ISSN 2709-9393 https://www.mathematicaljournal.com/archives/2021.v2.i1.A.19 NA
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
language English
topic QA Mathematics
spellingShingle QA Mathematics
Bawa, M. U.
Shabri, Anil
Dikko, H. G.
Garba, J.
Sadiku, S.
Forecasting performance of mixed data sampling (MIDAS) regressions, autoregressive distributed lag (ADL) model and hybrid of GARCH-MIDAS model: a comparative study
description This paper considers the Comparison of forecasting performance between Mixed Data sampling (MIDAS) Regressions model, Autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) Model and hybrid of GARCH-MIDAS. The data employed for this study was secondary type in nature for all the variables and it is obtained from the publications of Central Bank of Nigerian bulletin, National Bureau of Statistics and World Bank Statistics Database dated, January, 2005 to Dec, 2019. The result of unit root test shows that all variables are stationary at level and after first differences at 5% level of significant. From the results we found that F-statistics 1.895554 is inside the regions defined as the lower and upper bound (3.62 and 4.16) at 5% level of significant, this implies that there’s no long-run relationship between dependent variable (NSE) and independent Variable (CC). using forecasting evaluations with shows that that GARCH-MIDAS has a least value of RMSE and MAPE than ARDL and MIDAS model (1823.531 and 3.976542) is least than for MIDAS and Ardl models (2372.846, 4.765421 and 2134.732, 5.952348). Finally, we can conclude that GARCH- MIDAS model outperform MIDAS and ARDL models of Nigeria Stock Exchange.
format Article
author Bawa, M. U.
Shabri, Anil
Dikko, H. G.
Garba, J.
Sadiku, S.
author_facet Bawa, M. U.
Shabri, Anil
Dikko, H. G.
Garba, J.
Sadiku, S.
author_sort Bawa, M. U.
title Forecasting performance of mixed data sampling (MIDAS) regressions, autoregressive distributed lag (ADL) model and hybrid of GARCH-MIDAS model: a comparative study
title_short Forecasting performance of mixed data sampling (MIDAS) regressions, autoregressive distributed lag (ADL) model and hybrid of GARCH-MIDAS model: a comparative study
title_full Forecasting performance of mixed data sampling (MIDAS) regressions, autoregressive distributed lag (ADL) model and hybrid of GARCH-MIDAS model: a comparative study
title_fullStr Forecasting performance of mixed data sampling (MIDAS) regressions, autoregressive distributed lag (ADL) model and hybrid of GARCH-MIDAS model: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Forecasting performance of mixed data sampling (MIDAS) regressions, autoregressive distributed lag (ADL) model and hybrid of GARCH-MIDAS model: a comparative study
title_sort forecasting performance of mixed data sampling (midas) regressions, autoregressive distributed lag (adl) model and hybrid of garch-midas model: a comparative study
publisher JMPES
publishDate 2021
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/97762/1/AnilShabri2021_ForecastingPerformance0fMixedDataSampling.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/97762/
https://www.mathematicaljournal.com/archives/2021.v2.i1.A.19
_version_ 1748703141189124096
score 13.160551