A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions

Envisaging legal cases’ outcomes can assist the judicial decision-making process. Prediction is possible in various cases, such as predicting the outcome of construction litigation, crime-related cases, parental rights, worker types, divorces, and tax law. the machine learning methods can function a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rosili, Nur Aqilah Khadijah, Zakaria, Noor Hidayah, Hassan, Rohayanti, Kasim, Shahreen, Che Rose, Farid Zamani, Sutikno, Tole
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/95826/1/NoorHidayah2021_ASystematicLiteratureReviewofMachine.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/95826/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/IJAI.V10.I4.PP1091-1102
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.95826
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.958262022-06-19T03:01:14Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/95826/ A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions Rosili, Nur Aqilah Khadijah Zakaria, Noor Hidayah Hassan, Rohayanti Kasim, Shahreen Che Rose, Farid Zamani Sutikno, Tole QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science Envisaging legal cases’ outcomes can assist the judicial decision-making process. Prediction is possible in various cases, such as predicting the outcome of construction litigation, crime-related cases, parental rights, worker types, divorces, and tax law. the machine learning methods can function as support decision tools in the legal system with artificial intelligence’s advancement. This study aimed to impart a systematic literature review (SLR) of studies concerning the prediction of court decisions via machine learning methods. The review determines and analyses the machine learning methods used in predicting court decisions. This review utilised RepOrting Standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses (ROSES) publication standard. Subsequently, 22 relevant studies that most commonly predicted the judgement results involving binary classification were chosen from significant databases: Scopus and Web of Sciences. According to the SLR’s outcomes, various machine learning methods can be used in predicting court decisions. Additionally, the performance is acceptable since most methods achieved more than 70% accuracy. Nevertheless, improvements can be made on the types of judicial decisions predicted using the existing machine learning methods. Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 2021-12 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/95826/1/NoorHidayah2021_ASystematicLiteratureReviewofMachine.pdf Rosili, Nur Aqilah Khadijah and Zakaria, Noor Hidayah and Hassan, Rohayanti and Kasim, Shahreen and Che Rose, Farid Zamani and Sutikno, Tole (2021) A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 10 (4). pp. 1091-1102. ISSN 2089-4872 http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/IJAI.V10.I4.PP1091-1102 DOI:10.11591/IJAI.V10.I4.PP1091-1102
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
language English
topic QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
spellingShingle QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Rosili, Nur Aqilah Khadijah
Zakaria, Noor Hidayah
Hassan, Rohayanti
Kasim, Shahreen
Che Rose, Farid Zamani
Sutikno, Tole
A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions
description Envisaging legal cases’ outcomes can assist the judicial decision-making process. Prediction is possible in various cases, such as predicting the outcome of construction litigation, crime-related cases, parental rights, worker types, divorces, and tax law. the machine learning methods can function as support decision tools in the legal system with artificial intelligence’s advancement. This study aimed to impart a systematic literature review (SLR) of studies concerning the prediction of court decisions via machine learning methods. The review determines and analyses the machine learning methods used in predicting court decisions. This review utilised RepOrting Standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses (ROSES) publication standard. Subsequently, 22 relevant studies that most commonly predicted the judgement results involving binary classification were chosen from significant databases: Scopus and Web of Sciences. According to the SLR’s outcomes, various machine learning methods can be used in predicting court decisions. Additionally, the performance is acceptable since most methods achieved more than 70% accuracy. Nevertheless, improvements can be made on the types of judicial decisions predicted using the existing machine learning methods.
format Article
author Rosili, Nur Aqilah Khadijah
Zakaria, Noor Hidayah
Hassan, Rohayanti
Kasim, Shahreen
Che Rose, Farid Zamani
Sutikno, Tole
author_facet Rosili, Nur Aqilah Khadijah
Zakaria, Noor Hidayah
Hassan, Rohayanti
Kasim, Shahreen
Che Rose, Farid Zamani
Sutikno, Tole
author_sort Rosili, Nur Aqilah Khadijah
title A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions
title_short A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions
title_full A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions
title_fullStr A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions
title_full_unstemmed A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions
title_sort systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions
publisher Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
publishDate 2021
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/95826/1/NoorHidayah2021_ASystematicLiteratureReviewofMachine.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/95826/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/IJAI.V10.I4.PP1091-1102
_version_ 1736833512131002368
score 13.211869