A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions
Envisaging legal cases’ outcomes can assist the judicial decision-making process. Prediction is possible in various cases, such as predicting the outcome of construction litigation, crime-related cases, parental rights, worker types, divorces, and tax law. the machine learning methods can function a...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/95826/1/NoorHidayah2021_ASystematicLiteratureReviewofMachine.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/95826/ http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/IJAI.V10.I4.PP1091-1102 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.utm.95826 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utm.958262022-06-19T03:01:14Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/95826/ A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions Rosili, Nur Aqilah Khadijah Zakaria, Noor Hidayah Hassan, Rohayanti Kasim, Shahreen Che Rose, Farid Zamani Sutikno, Tole QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science Envisaging legal cases’ outcomes can assist the judicial decision-making process. Prediction is possible in various cases, such as predicting the outcome of construction litigation, crime-related cases, parental rights, worker types, divorces, and tax law. the machine learning methods can function as support decision tools in the legal system with artificial intelligence’s advancement. This study aimed to impart a systematic literature review (SLR) of studies concerning the prediction of court decisions via machine learning methods. The review determines and analyses the machine learning methods used in predicting court decisions. This review utilised RepOrting Standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses (ROSES) publication standard. Subsequently, 22 relevant studies that most commonly predicted the judgement results involving binary classification were chosen from significant databases: Scopus and Web of Sciences. According to the SLR’s outcomes, various machine learning methods can be used in predicting court decisions. Additionally, the performance is acceptable since most methods achieved more than 70% accuracy. Nevertheless, improvements can be made on the types of judicial decisions predicted using the existing machine learning methods. Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 2021-12 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/95826/1/NoorHidayah2021_ASystematicLiteratureReviewofMachine.pdf Rosili, Nur Aqilah Khadijah and Zakaria, Noor Hidayah and Hassan, Rohayanti and Kasim, Shahreen and Che Rose, Farid Zamani and Sutikno, Tole (2021) A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 10 (4). pp. 1091-1102. ISSN 2089-4872 http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/IJAI.V10.I4.PP1091-1102 DOI:10.11591/IJAI.V10.I4.PP1091-1102 |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
building |
UTM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
content_source |
UTM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utm.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science |
spellingShingle |
QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science Rosili, Nur Aqilah Khadijah Zakaria, Noor Hidayah Hassan, Rohayanti Kasim, Shahreen Che Rose, Farid Zamani Sutikno, Tole A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions |
description |
Envisaging legal cases’ outcomes can assist the judicial decision-making process. Prediction is possible in various cases, such as predicting the outcome of construction litigation, crime-related cases, parental rights, worker types, divorces, and tax law. the machine learning methods can function as support decision tools in the legal system with artificial intelligence’s advancement. This study aimed to impart a systematic literature review (SLR) of studies concerning the prediction of court decisions via machine learning methods. The review determines and analyses the machine learning methods used in predicting court decisions. This review utilised RepOrting Standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses (ROSES) publication standard. Subsequently, 22 relevant studies that most commonly predicted the judgement results involving binary classification were chosen from significant databases: Scopus and Web of Sciences. According to the SLR’s outcomes, various machine learning methods can be used in predicting court decisions. Additionally, the performance is acceptable since most methods achieved more than 70% accuracy. Nevertheless, improvements can be made on the types of judicial decisions predicted using the existing machine learning methods. |
format |
Article |
author |
Rosili, Nur Aqilah Khadijah Zakaria, Noor Hidayah Hassan, Rohayanti Kasim, Shahreen Che Rose, Farid Zamani Sutikno, Tole |
author_facet |
Rosili, Nur Aqilah Khadijah Zakaria, Noor Hidayah Hassan, Rohayanti Kasim, Shahreen Che Rose, Farid Zamani Sutikno, Tole |
author_sort |
Rosili, Nur Aqilah Khadijah |
title |
A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions |
title_short |
A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions |
title_full |
A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions |
title_fullStr |
A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions |
title_full_unstemmed |
A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions |
title_sort |
systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions |
publisher |
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/95826/1/NoorHidayah2021_ASystematicLiteratureReviewofMachine.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/95826/ http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/IJAI.V10.I4.PP1091-1102 |
_version_ |
1736833512131002368 |
score |
13.211869 |