Comparison study on four types mathematical model for sand-casting process
Modelling and optimisation of sand-casting process have been widely studied in casting research. The present study was developed to compare the four types of mathematical model and find the best model used in the optimised process. The four types of mathematical model discussed in this paper were mu...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/93575/1/RoselinaSalleh2020_ComparisonStudyonFourTypesMathematicalModel.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/93575/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/864/1/012074 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Modelling and optimisation of sand-casting process have been widely studied in casting research. The present study was developed to compare the four types of mathematical model and find the best model used in the optimised process. The four types of mathematical model discussed in this paper were multiple linear regression model, full factorial model, fractional factorial model and response surface methodology model. The best model will used for the optimized process using soft computing technique. The input parameters of these models were silica sand, bentonite, water and coal dust. Meanwhile, permeability was the model output. The four types of mathematical model produced were statistically validated to test for model adequacy by using ANOVA and coefficient of determination. Each model was finally, validated by using mean square error (MSE) and root square error (RMSE). The research findings proved that respond surface methodology model was the best model as compared the other models, which was significant with p-values of less than 0.05. The model also produced the smallest MSE. |
|---|