Effect of water alternating gas (WAG-N2) after water or gas flooding on crude oil recovery in sandstone reservoirs

Previous studies showed that nitrogen injection could recover oil up to 45-90 % of the Original Oil in Place (OOIP) of the reservoir. Additionally, when applying Water Alternating Gas (WAG-N2), recovery can be improved by combining gas and water and having better gas mobility control by reducing vis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alagorni, A. H., Yaacob, Z., Nour, A. H., Junin, Radzuan
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/93551/1/RadzuanJunin2020_EffectofWaterAlternatingGas.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/93551/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/736/2/022015
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.93551
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.935512021-11-30T08:33:52Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/93551/ Effect of water alternating gas (WAG-N2) after water or gas flooding on crude oil recovery in sandstone reservoirs Alagorni, A. H. Yaacob, Z. Nour, A. H. Junin, Radzuan TP Chemical technology Previous studies showed that nitrogen injection could recover oil up to 45-90 % of the Original Oil in Place (OOIP) of the reservoir. Additionally, when applying Water Alternating Gas (WAG-N2), recovery can be improved by combining gas and water and having better gas mobility control by reducing viscous fingering and density tonging, as well as contacting the un-swept zones, leading to an improved microscopic displacement. The objective of this study is to determine the total Oil Recovery Factor (ORF) of WAG-N2 process either after Water Flooding (WF) or after Gas Flooding (GF) in sandstone reservoirs. The results showed that with the following conditions: 38.8° API gravity oil, injection rate of 0.6cm3/m, injection pressure of 2000 psi (1378.59 kpa), WAG rate of 1:1, and Sand pack temperature of 70°C, the maximum ultimate ORF was 71.2 % in WAG after WF and 52.42 % of WAG after GF. On the other hand, WF provided ORF of 65.6 % when compared with GF recovery (29.03 %). 2020-03-04 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/93551/1/RadzuanJunin2020_EffectofWaterAlternatingGas.pdf Alagorni, A. H. and Yaacob, Z. and Nour, A. H. and Junin, Radzuan (2020) Effect of water alternating gas (WAG-N2) after water or gas flooding on crude oil recovery in sandstone reservoirs. In: Energy Security and Chemical Engineering Congress 2019, ESChE 2019, 17 July 2019 - 19 July 2019, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/736/2/022015
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
language English
topic TP Chemical technology
spellingShingle TP Chemical technology
Alagorni, A. H.
Yaacob, Z.
Nour, A. H.
Junin, Radzuan
Effect of water alternating gas (WAG-N2) after water or gas flooding on crude oil recovery in sandstone reservoirs
description Previous studies showed that nitrogen injection could recover oil up to 45-90 % of the Original Oil in Place (OOIP) of the reservoir. Additionally, when applying Water Alternating Gas (WAG-N2), recovery can be improved by combining gas and water and having better gas mobility control by reducing viscous fingering and density tonging, as well as contacting the un-swept zones, leading to an improved microscopic displacement. The objective of this study is to determine the total Oil Recovery Factor (ORF) of WAG-N2 process either after Water Flooding (WF) or after Gas Flooding (GF) in sandstone reservoirs. The results showed that with the following conditions: 38.8° API gravity oil, injection rate of 0.6cm3/m, injection pressure of 2000 psi (1378.59 kpa), WAG rate of 1:1, and Sand pack temperature of 70°C, the maximum ultimate ORF was 71.2 % in WAG after WF and 52.42 % of WAG after GF. On the other hand, WF provided ORF of 65.6 % when compared with GF recovery (29.03 %).
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Alagorni, A. H.
Yaacob, Z.
Nour, A. H.
Junin, Radzuan
author_facet Alagorni, A. H.
Yaacob, Z.
Nour, A. H.
Junin, Radzuan
author_sort Alagorni, A. H.
title Effect of water alternating gas (WAG-N2) after water or gas flooding on crude oil recovery in sandstone reservoirs
title_short Effect of water alternating gas (WAG-N2) after water or gas flooding on crude oil recovery in sandstone reservoirs
title_full Effect of water alternating gas (WAG-N2) after water or gas flooding on crude oil recovery in sandstone reservoirs
title_fullStr Effect of water alternating gas (WAG-N2) after water or gas flooding on crude oil recovery in sandstone reservoirs
title_full_unstemmed Effect of water alternating gas (WAG-N2) after water or gas flooding on crude oil recovery in sandstone reservoirs
title_sort effect of water alternating gas (wag-n2) after water or gas flooding on crude oil recovery in sandstone reservoirs
publishDate 2020
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/93551/1/RadzuanJunin2020_EffectofWaterAlternatingGas.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/93551/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/736/2/022015
_version_ 1718926084644274176
score 13.15806