Compaction characteristics of lime-treated tropical soil

Like soils of other regions in the world, some tropical soils are also associated with problems of low strength. To improve engineering characteristics of soils, several methods have been employed worldwide which are categorized as mechanical, chemical, thermal and electrical. The aim of this resear...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hezmi, M. A., Ahmad, K., Mohd. Yunus, N. Z., Kassim, K. A, Rashid, A. S. A., Abdul Hassan, N.
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/89351/1/KamarudinAhmad2019_CompactionCharacteristicsofLimeTreated.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/89351/
http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/527/1/012007
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Like soils of other regions in the world, some tropical soils are also associated with problems of low strength. To improve engineering characteristics of soils, several methods have been employed worldwide which are categorized as mechanical, chemical, thermal and electrical. The aim of this research is to compare the compaction characteristics of untreated and lime-treated soils. Soil samples obtained from three different points within a project site in Klang, Selangor were utilized in this study. Each sample was subjected to Eades and Grimm's test in accordance with ASTM D6276-99a to determine the appropriate lime dosage for soil stabilization. The required lime dosage was found between 1.3% and 3.4%. Then each untreated soil and soil sample mixed with 5% lime, higher than that obtained from Eades and Grimm's tests were compacted in accordance with BS 1377:1990. Generally, each soil sample achieved lower values of maximum dry density after treated with 5% lime than those of the untreated soils. Such observations were in good agreement with those obtained by previous researchers working on lime-treated soils. Nonetheless, the optimum moisture content of the lime-treated sample from Points 1 was slightly higher than that of the untreated sample. This finding was different from those obtained by previous researchers. Such contradicting observation might be due to the type and quantity of mineralogical contents of the soils studied.