Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree

In this study, we introduced novel hybrid of evidence believe function (EBF) with logistic regression (EBF-LR) and logistic model tree (EBF-LMT) for landslide susceptibility modelling. Fourteen conditioning factors were selected, including slope aspect, elevation, slope angle, profile curvature, pla...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen, Wei, Zhao, Xia, Shahabi, Himan, Shirzadi, Ataollah, Khosravi, Khabat, Chai, Huichan, Zhang, Shuai, Zhang, Lingyu, Ma, Jianquan, Chen, Yingtao, Wang, Xiaojing, Ahmad, Baharin, Li, Renwei
Format: Article
Published: Taylor and Francis Ltd. 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/88728/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1588393
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.88728
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.887282020-12-29T04:17:15Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/88728/ Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree Chen, Wei Zhao, Xia Shahabi, Himan Shirzadi, Ataollah Khosravi, Khabat Chai, Huichan Zhang, Shuai Zhang, Lingyu Ma, Jianquan Chen, Yingtao Wang, Xiaojing Ahmad, Baharin Li, Renwei TH434-437 Quantity surveying In this study, we introduced novel hybrid of evidence believe function (EBF) with logistic regression (EBF-LR) and logistic model tree (EBF-LMT) for landslide susceptibility modelling. Fourteen conditioning factors were selected, including slope aspect, elevation, slope angle, profile curvature, plan curvature, topographic wetness index (TWI), stream sediment transport index (STI), stream power index (SPI), distance to rivers, distance to faults, distance to roads, lithology, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and land use. The importance of factors was assessed using correlation attribute evaluation method. Finally, the performance of three models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). The validation process indicated that the EBF-LMT model acquired the highest AUC for the training (84.7%) and validation (76.5%) datasets, followed by EBF-LR and EBF models. Our result also confirmed that combination of a decision tree-logistic regression-based algorithm with a bivariate statistical model lead to enhance the prediction power of individual landslide models. Taylor and Francis Ltd. 2019-06 Article PeerReviewed Chen, Wei and Zhao, Xia and Shahabi, Himan and Shirzadi, Ataollah and Khosravi, Khabat and Chai, Huichan and Zhang, Shuai and Zhang, Lingyu and Ma, Jianquan and Chen, Yingtao and Wang, Xiaojing and Ahmad, Baharin and Li, Renwei (2019) Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree. Geocarto International, 34 (11). pp. 1177-1201. ISSN 1010-6049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1588393 DOI:10.1080/10106049.2019.1588393
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic TH434-437 Quantity surveying
spellingShingle TH434-437 Quantity surveying
Chen, Wei
Zhao, Xia
Shahabi, Himan
Shirzadi, Ataollah
Khosravi, Khabat
Chai, Huichan
Zhang, Shuai
Zhang, Lingyu
Ma, Jianquan
Chen, Yingtao
Wang, Xiaojing
Ahmad, Baharin
Li, Renwei
Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree
description In this study, we introduced novel hybrid of evidence believe function (EBF) with logistic regression (EBF-LR) and logistic model tree (EBF-LMT) for landslide susceptibility modelling. Fourteen conditioning factors were selected, including slope aspect, elevation, slope angle, profile curvature, plan curvature, topographic wetness index (TWI), stream sediment transport index (STI), stream power index (SPI), distance to rivers, distance to faults, distance to roads, lithology, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and land use. The importance of factors was assessed using correlation attribute evaluation method. Finally, the performance of three models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). The validation process indicated that the EBF-LMT model acquired the highest AUC for the training (84.7%) and validation (76.5%) datasets, followed by EBF-LR and EBF models. Our result also confirmed that combination of a decision tree-logistic regression-based algorithm with a bivariate statistical model lead to enhance the prediction power of individual landslide models.
format Article
author Chen, Wei
Zhao, Xia
Shahabi, Himan
Shirzadi, Ataollah
Khosravi, Khabat
Chai, Huichan
Zhang, Shuai
Zhang, Lingyu
Ma, Jianquan
Chen, Yingtao
Wang, Xiaojing
Ahmad, Baharin
Li, Renwei
author_facet Chen, Wei
Zhao, Xia
Shahabi, Himan
Shirzadi, Ataollah
Khosravi, Khabat
Chai, Huichan
Zhang, Shuai
Zhang, Lingyu
Ma, Jianquan
Chen, Yingtao
Wang, Xiaojing
Ahmad, Baharin
Li, Renwei
author_sort Chen, Wei
title Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree
title_short Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree
title_full Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree
title_fullStr Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree
title_full_unstemmed Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree
title_sort spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree
publisher Taylor and Francis Ltd.
publishDate 2019
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/88728/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1588393
_version_ 1687393612947521536
score 13.15806