Longitudinal tracking of students academic progress using model-based clustering

Clustering methods have often been used to group similar students’ performance for tracking their academic progress. A typical approach is to group the students by treating the observations as accumulated average marks on several assessed subjects within a period of time. Here, similar characteristi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adnan, N., Ahmad, N.
Format: Article
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/87927/
http://www.dx.doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I5/PR201714
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.87927
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.879272020-11-30T13:37:13Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/87927/ Longitudinal tracking of students academic progress using model-based clustering Adnan, N. Ahmad, N. L Education (General) Clustering methods have often been used to group similar students’ performance for tracking their academic progress. A typical approach is to group the students by treating the observations as accumulated average marks on several assessed subjects within a period of time. Here, similar characteristics of students are identified based on the overall variation of marks between the subjects but ignores the temporal aspect of students performance even though the assessments are carried out at different time points. Alternatively, such characteristics in the observations could be treated as a set of longitudinal data since the measurements consider time-spaced and repeated events. This paper aims to compare the output between these two different treatments of observations using Model-based Clustering (MBC). Specifically, the average observations are applied to the classical MBC whereas the longitudinal observations require some adjustment to the covariance matrix to cater for its longitudinal data structure. A synthetic data set generated based on some pre-university students’ marks on four science subjects from three series of continuous assessments are applied to the methods. The results show that the longitudinal observations on adjusted MBC produce a greater number of clusters that could characterise students’ progress with a better internal and external cluster quality compared to the average observations on classical MBC. 2020 Article PeerReviewed Adnan, N. and Ahmad, N. (2020) Longitudinal tracking of students academic progress using model-based clustering. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24 (5). pp. 497-505. ISSN 1475-7192 http://www.dx.doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I5/PR201714 DOI: 10.37200/IJPR/V24I5/PR201714
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic L Education (General)
spellingShingle L Education (General)
Adnan, N.
Ahmad, N.
Longitudinal tracking of students academic progress using model-based clustering
description Clustering methods have often been used to group similar students’ performance for tracking their academic progress. A typical approach is to group the students by treating the observations as accumulated average marks on several assessed subjects within a period of time. Here, similar characteristics of students are identified based on the overall variation of marks between the subjects but ignores the temporal aspect of students performance even though the assessments are carried out at different time points. Alternatively, such characteristics in the observations could be treated as a set of longitudinal data since the measurements consider time-spaced and repeated events. This paper aims to compare the output between these two different treatments of observations using Model-based Clustering (MBC). Specifically, the average observations are applied to the classical MBC whereas the longitudinal observations require some adjustment to the covariance matrix to cater for its longitudinal data structure. A synthetic data set generated based on some pre-university students’ marks on four science subjects from three series of continuous assessments are applied to the methods. The results show that the longitudinal observations on adjusted MBC produce a greater number of clusters that could characterise students’ progress with a better internal and external cluster quality compared to the average observations on classical MBC.
format Article
author Adnan, N.
Ahmad, N.
author_facet Adnan, N.
Ahmad, N.
author_sort Adnan, N.
title Longitudinal tracking of students academic progress using model-based clustering
title_short Longitudinal tracking of students academic progress using model-based clustering
title_full Longitudinal tracking of students academic progress using model-based clustering
title_fullStr Longitudinal tracking of students academic progress using model-based clustering
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal tracking of students academic progress using model-based clustering
title_sort longitudinal tracking of students academic progress using model-based clustering
publishDate 2020
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/87927/
http://www.dx.doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I5/PR201714
_version_ 1685579010646474752
score 13.214268