Effect of various pretreatment methods on sugar and ethanol production from cellulosic water hyacinth

Effects of acid, alkali, ionic liquid (IL), and microwave-alkali pretreatments on cellulosic water hyacinth (WH) were investigated based on the total reducing sugars (TRS) and ethanol production. For the first time, IL pretreatment with (1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([EMIM][Ac]) was used for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rezania, Shahabaldin, Alizadeh, Hossein, Park, Junboum, Md. Din, Mohd. Fadhil, Darajeh, Negisa, Ebrahimi, Shirin Shafiei, Saha, Bidyut Baran, Kamyab, Hesam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: North Carolina State University 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/87652/1/MohdFadhilD2019_EffectofVariousPretreatmentMethodsonSugar.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/87652/
http://dx.doi.org/10.15376/biores.14.1.592-606
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.87652
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.876522020-11-30T09:06:38Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/87652/ Effect of various pretreatment methods on sugar and ethanol production from cellulosic water hyacinth Rezania, Shahabaldin Alizadeh, Hossein Park, Junboum Md. Din, Mohd. Fadhil Darajeh, Negisa Ebrahimi, Shirin Shafiei Saha, Bidyut Baran Kamyab, Hesam TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Effects of acid, alkali, ionic liquid (IL), and microwave-alkali pretreatments on cellulosic water hyacinth (WH) were investigated based on the total reducing sugars (TRS) and ethanol production. For the first time, IL pretreatment with (1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([EMIM][Ac]) was used for WH, and the efficiency was compared with the other methods. Cellulase and Saccharomyces cerevisiae were fermented together for 72 h. Based on the results, all pretreatment methods effectively increased the sugar content as well as the ethanol yield. Untreated WH had 25 ± 1.5 mg/g of TRS, which was increased to 157 ± 8.2 mg/g, 95 ± 3.1 mg/g, 51 ± 4.2 mg/g, and 45 ± 2.6 mg/g via alkali, microwave-alkali, acid, and IL pretreatments, respectively. The highest TRS level of 402 mg/g was obtained in 24 h and 6.2 ± 0.4 g/L of ethanol in 48 h of fermentation with the alkali-treated WH. The ethanol production was followed by other treatment methods of WH in the order of microwave-alkali, acid, and IL. The results indicated that the ethanol production from WH was related to the type of pretreatment as well as the TRS production. North Carolina State University 2019-02-01 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/87652/1/MohdFadhilD2019_EffectofVariousPretreatmentMethodsonSugar.pdf Rezania, Shahabaldin and Alizadeh, Hossein and Park, Junboum and Md. Din, Mohd. Fadhil and Darajeh, Negisa and Ebrahimi, Shirin Shafiei and Saha, Bidyut Baran and Kamyab, Hesam (2019) Effect of various pretreatment methods on sugar and ethanol production from cellulosic water hyacinth. BioResources, 14 (1). pp. 592-606. ISSN 1930-2126 http://dx.doi.org/10.15376/biores.14.1.592-606 DOI:10.15376/biores.14.1.592-606
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
language English
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Rezania, Shahabaldin
Alizadeh, Hossein
Park, Junboum
Md. Din, Mohd. Fadhil
Darajeh, Negisa
Ebrahimi, Shirin Shafiei
Saha, Bidyut Baran
Kamyab, Hesam
Effect of various pretreatment methods on sugar and ethanol production from cellulosic water hyacinth
description Effects of acid, alkali, ionic liquid (IL), and microwave-alkali pretreatments on cellulosic water hyacinth (WH) were investigated based on the total reducing sugars (TRS) and ethanol production. For the first time, IL pretreatment with (1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([EMIM][Ac]) was used for WH, and the efficiency was compared with the other methods. Cellulase and Saccharomyces cerevisiae were fermented together for 72 h. Based on the results, all pretreatment methods effectively increased the sugar content as well as the ethanol yield. Untreated WH had 25 ± 1.5 mg/g of TRS, which was increased to 157 ± 8.2 mg/g, 95 ± 3.1 mg/g, 51 ± 4.2 mg/g, and 45 ± 2.6 mg/g via alkali, microwave-alkali, acid, and IL pretreatments, respectively. The highest TRS level of 402 mg/g was obtained in 24 h and 6.2 ± 0.4 g/L of ethanol in 48 h of fermentation with the alkali-treated WH. The ethanol production was followed by other treatment methods of WH in the order of microwave-alkali, acid, and IL. The results indicated that the ethanol production from WH was related to the type of pretreatment as well as the TRS production.
format Article
author Rezania, Shahabaldin
Alizadeh, Hossein
Park, Junboum
Md. Din, Mohd. Fadhil
Darajeh, Negisa
Ebrahimi, Shirin Shafiei
Saha, Bidyut Baran
Kamyab, Hesam
author_facet Rezania, Shahabaldin
Alizadeh, Hossein
Park, Junboum
Md. Din, Mohd. Fadhil
Darajeh, Negisa
Ebrahimi, Shirin Shafiei
Saha, Bidyut Baran
Kamyab, Hesam
author_sort Rezania, Shahabaldin
title Effect of various pretreatment methods on sugar and ethanol production from cellulosic water hyacinth
title_short Effect of various pretreatment methods on sugar and ethanol production from cellulosic water hyacinth
title_full Effect of various pretreatment methods on sugar and ethanol production from cellulosic water hyacinth
title_fullStr Effect of various pretreatment methods on sugar and ethanol production from cellulosic water hyacinth
title_full_unstemmed Effect of various pretreatment methods on sugar and ethanol production from cellulosic water hyacinth
title_sort effect of various pretreatment methods on sugar and ethanol production from cellulosic water hyacinth
publisher North Carolina State University
publishDate 2019
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/87652/1/MohdFadhilD2019_EffectofVariousPretreatmentMethodsonSugar.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/87652/
http://dx.doi.org/10.15376/biores.14.1.592-606
_version_ 1685578968812486656
score 13.18916