Shallow landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between logistic model tree, logistic regression, nave bayes tree, artificial neural network, and support vector machine algorithms

Shallow landslides damage buildings and other infrastructure, disrupt agriculture practices, and can cause social upheaval and loss of life. As a result, many scientists study the phenomenon, and some of them have focused on producing landslide susceptibility maps that can be used by land-use manage...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nhu, V. H., Shirzadi, A., Shahabi, H., Singh, S. K., Al-Ansari, N., Clague, J. J., Jaafari, A., Chen, W., Miraki, S., Dou, J., Luu, C., Górski, K., Pham, B. T., Nguyen, H. D., Ahmad, B. B.
Format: Article
Published: MDPI AG 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/87497/
http://www.dx.doi.org/ 10.3390/ijerph17082749
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.87497
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.874972020-11-08T04:05:12Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/87497/ Shallow landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between logistic model tree, logistic regression, nave bayes tree, artificial neural network, and support vector machine algorithms Nhu, V. H. Shirzadi, A. Shahabi, H. Singh, S. K. Al-Ansari, N. Clague, J. J. Jaafari, A. Chen, W. Miraki, S. Dou, J. Luu, C. Górski, K. Pham, B. T. Nguyen, H. D. Ahmad, B. B. NA Architecture Shallow landslides damage buildings and other infrastructure, disrupt agriculture practices, and can cause social upheaval and loss of life. As a result, many scientists study the phenomenon, and some of them have focused on producing landslide susceptibility maps that can be used by land-use managers to reduce injury and damage. This paper contributes to this effort by comparing the power and effectiveness of five machine learning, benchmark algorithms—Logistic Model Tree, Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes Tree, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine—in creating a reliable shallow landslide susceptibility map for Bijar City in Kurdistan province, Iran. Twenty conditioning factors were applied to 111 shallow landslides and tested using the One-R attribute evaluation (ORAE) technique for modeling and validation processes. The performance of the models was assessed by statistical-based indexes including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the receiver operatic characteristic curve (AUC). Results indicate that all the five machine learning models performed well for shallow landslide susceptibility assessment, but the Logistic Model Tree model (AUC = 0.932) had the highest goodness-of-fit and prediction accuracy, followed by the Logistic Regression (AUC = 0.932), Naïve Bayes Tree (AUC = 0.864), ANN (AUC = 0.860), and Support Vector Machine (AUC = 0.834) models. Therefore, we recommend the use of the Logistic Model Tree model in shallow landslide mapping programs in semi-arid regions to help decision makers, planners, land-use managers, and government agencies mitigate the hazard and risk. MDPI AG 2020-04 Article PeerReviewed Nhu, V. H. and Shirzadi, A. and Shahabi, H. and Singh, S. K. and Al-Ansari, N. and Clague, J. J. and Jaafari, A. and Chen, W. and Miraki, S. and Dou, J. and Luu, C. and Górski, K. and Pham, B. T. and Nguyen, H. D. and Ahmad, B. B. (2020) Shallow landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between logistic model tree, logistic regression, nave bayes tree, artificial neural network, and support vector machine algorithms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (8). ISSN 1661-7827 http://www.dx.doi.org/ 10.3390/ijerph17082749 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17082749
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic NA Architecture
spellingShingle NA Architecture
Nhu, V. H.
Shirzadi, A.
Shahabi, H.
Singh, S. K.
Al-Ansari, N.
Clague, J. J.
Jaafari, A.
Chen, W.
Miraki, S.
Dou, J.
Luu, C.
Górski, K.
Pham, B. T.
Nguyen, H. D.
Ahmad, B. B.
Shallow landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between logistic model tree, logistic regression, nave bayes tree, artificial neural network, and support vector machine algorithms
description Shallow landslides damage buildings and other infrastructure, disrupt agriculture practices, and can cause social upheaval and loss of life. As a result, many scientists study the phenomenon, and some of them have focused on producing landslide susceptibility maps that can be used by land-use managers to reduce injury and damage. This paper contributes to this effort by comparing the power and effectiveness of five machine learning, benchmark algorithms—Logistic Model Tree, Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes Tree, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine—in creating a reliable shallow landslide susceptibility map for Bijar City in Kurdistan province, Iran. Twenty conditioning factors were applied to 111 shallow landslides and tested using the One-R attribute evaluation (ORAE) technique for modeling and validation processes. The performance of the models was assessed by statistical-based indexes including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the receiver operatic characteristic curve (AUC). Results indicate that all the five machine learning models performed well for shallow landslide susceptibility assessment, but the Logistic Model Tree model (AUC = 0.932) had the highest goodness-of-fit and prediction accuracy, followed by the Logistic Regression (AUC = 0.932), Naïve Bayes Tree (AUC = 0.864), ANN (AUC = 0.860), and Support Vector Machine (AUC = 0.834) models. Therefore, we recommend the use of the Logistic Model Tree model in shallow landslide mapping programs in semi-arid regions to help decision makers, planners, land-use managers, and government agencies mitigate the hazard and risk.
format Article
author Nhu, V. H.
Shirzadi, A.
Shahabi, H.
Singh, S. K.
Al-Ansari, N.
Clague, J. J.
Jaafari, A.
Chen, W.
Miraki, S.
Dou, J.
Luu, C.
Górski, K.
Pham, B. T.
Nguyen, H. D.
Ahmad, B. B.
author_facet Nhu, V. H.
Shirzadi, A.
Shahabi, H.
Singh, S. K.
Al-Ansari, N.
Clague, J. J.
Jaafari, A.
Chen, W.
Miraki, S.
Dou, J.
Luu, C.
Górski, K.
Pham, B. T.
Nguyen, H. D.
Ahmad, B. B.
author_sort Nhu, V. H.
title Shallow landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between logistic model tree, logistic regression, nave bayes tree, artificial neural network, and support vector machine algorithms
title_short Shallow landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between logistic model tree, logistic regression, nave bayes tree, artificial neural network, and support vector machine algorithms
title_full Shallow landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between logistic model tree, logistic regression, nave bayes tree, artificial neural network, and support vector machine algorithms
title_fullStr Shallow landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between logistic model tree, logistic regression, nave bayes tree, artificial neural network, and support vector machine algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Shallow landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between logistic model tree, logistic regression, nave bayes tree, artificial neural network, and support vector machine algorithms
title_sort shallow landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between logistic model tree, logistic regression, nave bayes tree, artificial neural network, and support vector machine algorithms
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2020
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/87497/
http://www.dx.doi.org/ 10.3390/ijerph17082749
_version_ 1683230774696869888
score 13.18916