In vitro selection and characterization of single stranded DNA aptamers for luteolin: A possible recognition tool

Distinctive bioactivities possessed by luteolin (3′ 4′ 5, 7-tetrahydroxy-flavone) are advantageous for sundry practical applications. This paper reports the in vitro selection and characterization of single stranded-DNA (ssDNA) aptamers, specific for luteolin (LUT). 76-mer library containing 1015 ra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sabah, Jinan Tuma, Mohamed Zulkifli, Razauden, Shahir, Shafinaz, Ahmed, Farediah, Abdul Kadir, Mohammed Rafiq, Zakaria, Zarita
Format: Article
Published: Academic Press Inc. 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/85913/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2018.03.004
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.85913
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.859132020-07-30T07:38:58Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/85913/ In vitro selection and characterization of single stranded DNA aptamers for luteolin: A possible recognition tool Sabah, Jinan Tuma Mohamed Zulkifli, Razauden Shahir, Shafinaz Ahmed, Farediah Abdul Kadir, Mohammed Rafiq Zakaria, Zarita Q Science (General) Distinctive bioactivities possessed by luteolin (3′ 4′ 5, 7-tetrahydroxy-flavone) are advantageous for sundry practical applications. This paper reports the in vitro selection and characterization of single stranded-DNA (ssDNA) aptamers, specific for luteolin (LUT). 76-mer library containing 1015 randomized ssDNA were screened via systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX). The recovered ssDNA pool from the 8th round was amplified with unlabeled primers and cloned into PSTBlue-1 vector prior to sequencing. 22 of LUT-binding aptamer variants were further classified into one of the seven groups based on their N40 random sequence regions, wherein one representative from each group was characterized. The dissociation constant of aptamers designated as LUT#28, LUT#20 and LUT#3 was discerned to be 107, 214 and 109 nM, respectively with high binding affinity towards LUT. Prediction analysis of the secondary structure suggested discrete features with typical loop and stem motifs. Furthermore, LUT#3 displayed higher specificity with insignificant binding toward kaempferol and quercetin despite its structural and functional similarity compared to LUT#28 and LUT#20. Further LUT#3 can detect free luteolin within 0.2–1 mM in solution. It was suggested that LUT#3 aptamer were the most suitable for LUT recognition tool at laboratory scale based on the condition tested. Academic Press Inc. 2018-05 Article PeerReviewed Sabah, Jinan Tuma and Mohamed Zulkifli, Razauden and Shahir, Shafinaz and Ahmed, Farediah and Abdul Kadir, Mohammed Rafiq and Zakaria, Zarita (2018) In vitro selection and characterization of single stranded DNA aptamers for luteolin: A possible recognition tool. Analytical Biochemistry, 549 . pp. 72-79. ISSN 0003-2697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2018.03.004
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic Q Science (General)
spellingShingle Q Science (General)
Sabah, Jinan Tuma
Mohamed Zulkifli, Razauden
Shahir, Shafinaz
Ahmed, Farediah
Abdul Kadir, Mohammed Rafiq
Zakaria, Zarita
In vitro selection and characterization of single stranded DNA aptamers for luteolin: A possible recognition tool
description Distinctive bioactivities possessed by luteolin (3′ 4′ 5, 7-tetrahydroxy-flavone) are advantageous for sundry practical applications. This paper reports the in vitro selection and characterization of single stranded-DNA (ssDNA) aptamers, specific for luteolin (LUT). 76-mer library containing 1015 randomized ssDNA were screened via systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX). The recovered ssDNA pool from the 8th round was amplified with unlabeled primers and cloned into PSTBlue-1 vector prior to sequencing. 22 of LUT-binding aptamer variants were further classified into one of the seven groups based on their N40 random sequence regions, wherein one representative from each group was characterized. The dissociation constant of aptamers designated as LUT#28, LUT#20 and LUT#3 was discerned to be 107, 214 and 109 nM, respectively with high binding affinity towards LUT. Prediction analysis of the secondary structure suggested discrete features with typical loop and stem motifs. Furthermore, LUT#3 displayed higher specificity with insignificant binding toward kaempferol and quercetin despite its structural and functional similarity compared to LUT#28 and LUT#20. Further LUT#3 can detect free luteolin within 0.2–1 mM in solution. It was suggested that LUT#3 aptamer were the most suitable for LUT recognition tool at laboratory scale based on the condition tested.
format Article
author Sabah, Jinan Tuma
Mohamed Zulkifli, Razauden
Shahir, Shafinaz
Ahmed, Farediah
Abdul Kadir, Mohammed Rafiq
Zakaria, Zarita
author_facet Sabah, Jinan Tuma
Mohamed Zulkifli, Razauden
Shahir, Shafinaz
Ahmed, Farediah
Abdul Kadir, Mohammed Rafiq
Zakaria, Zarita
author_sort Sabah, Jinan Tuma
title In vitro selection and characterization of single stranded DNA aptamers for luteolin: A possible recognition tool
title_short In vitro selection and characterization of single stranded DNA aptamers for luteolin: A possible recognition tool
title_full In vitro selection and characterization of single stranded DNA aptamers for luteolin: A possible recognition tool
title_fullStr In vitro selection and characterization of single stranded DNA aptamers for luteolin: A possible recognition tool
title_full_unstemmed In vitro selection and characterization of single stranded DNA aptamers for luteolin: A possible recognition tool
title_sort in vitro selection and characterization of single stranded dna aptamers for luteolin: a possible recognition tool
publisher Academic Press Inc.
publishDate 2018
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/85913/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2018.03.004
_version_ 1674066226723160064
score 13.211869