Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review
Purpose: The literature on entrepreneurial ecosystems is fragmented, and yet, no studies have paid attention to integrating the available studies. The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic review of contributions related to entrepreneurial ecosystems. Design/methodology/approach: This lit...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Published: |
Emerald Publishing Limited
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/85413/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEC-03-2017-0025 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.utm.85413 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utm.854132020-06-16T06:48:27Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/85413/ Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review Maroufkhani, Parisa Wagner, Ralf Wan Ismail, Wan Khairuzzaman HB615-715 Entrepreneurship. Risk and uncertainty. Property Purpose: The literature on entrepreneurial ecosystems is fragmented, and yet, no studies have paid attention to integrating the available studies. The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic review of contributions related to entrepreneurial ecosystems. Design/methodology/approach: This literature review evaluates studies that are covered in the Web of Science index. Findings: In addition to the recent state of research (covering industries, geographical scopes, methodologies, etc.), this study provides an extension of Isenberg’s (2011) model of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research limitations/implications: A new avenue arises for both conceptual and empirical research by emphasizing crowdsourcing as a contributing element for the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Future studies can evaluate the effectiveness of different types of crowdsourcing profoundly to make sure whether creating a promising ecosystem all types of crowdsourcing have a similar value or impact. Practical implications: For public policy and local decision-makers, both collaboration opportunities and interaction interfaces between the stakeholders of the entrepreneurial need to be reconsidered in the design of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Social implications: Higher degrees of collaboration, information exchange and innovation are likely to yield favorable entrepreneurship environments. Originality/value: Novelty of this study arises from integrating crowdsourcing theory in the systematic review of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Emerald Publishing Limited 2018-09-03 Article PeerReviewed Maroufkhani, Parisa and Wagner, Ralf and Wan Ismail, Wan Khairuzzaman (2018) Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 12 (4). pp. 545-564. ISSN 1750-6204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEC-03-2017-0025 DOI:10.1108/JEC-03-2017-0025 |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
building |
UTM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
content_source |
UTM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utm.my/ |
topic |
HB615-715 Entrepreneurship. Risk and uncertainty. Property |
spellingShingle |
HB615-715 Entrepreneurship. Risk and uncertainty. Property Maroufkhani, Parisa Wagner, Ralf Wan Ismail, Wan Khairuzzaman Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review |
description |
Purpose: The literature on entrepreneurial ecosystems is fragmented, and yet, no studies have paid attention to integrating the available studies. The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic review of contributions related to entrepreneurial ecosystems. Design/methodology/approach: This literature review evaluates studies that are covered in the Web of Science index. Findings: In addition to the recent state of research (covering industries, geographical scopes, methodologies, etc.), this study provides an extension of Isenberg’s (2011) model of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research limitations/implications: A new avenue arises for both conceptual and empirical research by emphasizing crowdsourcing as a contributing element for the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Future studies can evaluate the effectiveness of different types of crowdsourcing profoundly to make sure whether creating a promising ecosystem all types of crowdsourcing have a similar value or impact. Practical implications: For public policy and local decision-makers, both collaboration opportunities and interaction interfaces between the stakeholders of the entrepreneurial need to be reconsidered in the design of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Social implications: Higher degrees of collaboration, information exchange and innovation are likely to yield favorable entrepreneurship environments. Originality/value: Novelty of this study arises from integrating crowdsourcing theory in the systematic review of entrepreneurial ecosystems. |
format |
Article |
author |
Maroufkhani, Parisa Wagner, Ralf Wan Ismail, Wan Khairuzzaman |
author_facet |
Maroufkhani, Parisa Wagner, Ralf Wan Ismail, Wan Khairuzzaman |
author_sort |
Maroufkhani, Parisa |
title |
Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review |
title_short |
Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review |
title_full |
Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review |
title_sort |
entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review |
publisher |
Emerald Publishing Limited |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/85413/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEC-03-2017-0025 |
_version_ |
1672610530660974592 |
score |
13.19449 |