Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review

Purpose: The literature on entrepreneurial ecosystems is fragmented, and yet, no studies have paid attention to integrating the available studies. The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic review of contributions related to entrepreneurial ecosystems. Design/methodology/approach: This lit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maroufkhani, Parisa, Wagner, Ralf, Wan Ismail, Wan Khairuzzaman
Format: Article
Published: Emerald Publishing Limited 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/85413/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEC-03-2017-0025
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.85413
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.854132020-06-16T06:48:27Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/85413/ Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review Maroufkhani, Parisa Wagner, Ralf Wan Ismail, Wan Khairuzzaman HB615-715 Entrepreneurship. Risk and uncertainty. Property Purpose: The literature on entrepreneurial ecosystems is fragmented, and yet, no studies have paid attention to integrating the available studies. The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic review of contributions related to entrepreneurial ecosystems. Design/methodology/approach: This literature review evaluates studies that are covered in the Web of Science index. Findings: In addition to the recent state of research (covering industries, geographical scopes, methodologies, etc.), this study provides an extension of Isenberg’s (2011) model of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research limitations/implications: A new avenue arises for both conceptual and empirical research by emphasizing crowdsourcing as a contributing element for the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Future studies can evaluate the effectiveness of different types of crowdsourcing profoundly to make sure whether creating a promising ecosystem all types of crowdsourcing have a similar value or impact. Practical implications: For public policy and local decision-makers, both collaboration opportunities and interaction interfaces between the stakeholders of the entrepreneurial need to be reconsidered in the design of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Social implications: Higher degrees of collaboration, information exchange and innovation are likely to yield favorable entrepreneurship environments. Originality/value: Novelty of this study arises from integrating crowdsourcing theory in the systematic review of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Emerald Publishing Limited 2018-09-03 Article PeerReviewed Maroufkhani, Parisa and Wagner, Ralf and Wan Ismail, Wan Khairuzzaman (2018) Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 12 (4). pp. 545-564. ISSN 1750-6204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEC-03-2017-0025 DOI:10.1108/JEC-03-2017-0025
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic HB615-715 Entrepreneurship. Risk and uncertainty. Property
spellingShingle HB615-715 Entrepreneurship. Risk and uncertainty. Property
Maroufkhani, Parisa
Wagner, Ralf
Wan Ismail, Wan Khairuzzaman
Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review
description Purpose: The literature on entrepreneurial ecosystems is fragmented, and yet, no studies have paid attention to integrating the available studies. The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic review of contributions related to entrepreneurial ecosystems. Design/methodology/approach: This literature review evaluates studies that are covered in the Web of Science index. Findings: In addition to the recent state of research (covering industries, geographical scopes, methodologies, etc.), this study provides an extension of Isenberg’s (2011) model of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research limitations/implications: A new avenue arises for both conceptual and empirical research by emphasizing crowdsourcing as a contributing element for the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Future studies can evaluate the effectiveness of different types of crowdsourcing profoundly to make sure whether creating a promising ecosystem all types of crowdsourcing have a similar value or impact. Practical implications: For public policy and local decision-makers, both collaboration opportunities and interaction interfaces between the stakeholders of the entrepreneurial need to be reconsidered in the design of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Social implications: Higher degrees of collaboration, information exchange and innovation are likely to yield favorable entrepreneurship environments. Originality/value: Novelty of this study arises from integrating crowdsourcing theory in the systematic review of entrepreneurial ecosystems.
format Article
author Maroufkhani, Parisa
Wagner, Ralf
Wan Ismail, Wan Khairuzzaman
author_facet Maroufkhani, Parisa
Wagner, Ralf
Wan Ismail, Wan Khairuzzaman
author_sort Maroufkhani, Parisa
title Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review
title_short Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review
title_full Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review
title_fullStr Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review
title_sort entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review
publisher Emerald Publishing Limited
publishDate 2018
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/85413/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEC-03-2017-0025
_version_ 1672610530660974592
score 13.19449