Space charge and conductivity measurement of XLPE nanocomposites for HVDC insulation-permittivity as a nanofiller selection parameter

Cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) insulation is successfully used for high-voltage AC transmission. However, it is still under development for high-voltage DC application due to space charge accumulation, which distorts the internal electrical field distribution and leads to its aging/failure. Theref...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sharad, Paramane Ashish, Kumar, Kannaiah Sathish Suresh, Ahmad, Mohd. Hafizi, M. Piah, M. Afendi
Format: Article
Published: Institution of Engineering and Technology 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/84555/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-smt.2018.5134
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.84555
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.845552020-02-27T03:05:11Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/84555/ Space charge and conductivity measurement of XLPE nanocomposites for HVDC insulation-permittivity as a nanofiller selection parameter Sharad, Paramane Ashish Kumar, Kannaiah Sathish Suresh Ahmad, Mohd. Hafizi M. Piah, M. Afendi TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering Cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) insulation is successfully used for high-voltage AC transmission. However, it is still under development for high-voltage DC application due to space charge accumulation, which distorts the internal electrical field distribution and leads to its aging/failure. Therefore, the space charge should be measured and carefully analysed. On the other side, conductivity measurement helps to forecast the degradation probability of the insulation. Higher conductivity represents the severe degradation. Nanofiller addition, such as SiO2, TiO2, MgO and so on (< 5 wt%), particularly surface-modified nanofiller due to its better dispersion significantly suppresses the space charge accumulation and conductivity. Nevertheless, the choice of suitable nanofiller has still remained a challenge. With this context, space charge and conductivity of XLPE-silica and XLPEmagnesium oxide (MgO) surface-modified nanocomposites are measured. This study proposes a parameter for nanofiller selection that will deliver optimal properties for the intended application. Results show that nanocomposites with higher nanofiller permittivity (i.e. MgO) have less space charge accumulation and low conductivity and are justified with the help of a band gap theory model. Institution of Engineering and Technology 2018-11-01 Article PeerReviewed Sharad, Paramane Ashish and Kumar, Kannaiah Sathish Suresh and Ahmad, Mohd. Hafizi and M. Piah, M. Afendi (2018) Space charge and conductivity measurement of XLPE nanocomposites for HVDC insulation-permittivity as a nanofiller selection parameter. IET Science, Measurement and Technology, 12 (8). pp. 1058-1065. ISSN 1751-8822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-smt.2018.5134 DOI:10.1049/iet-smt.2018.5134
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
spellingShingle TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
Sharad, Paramane Ashish
Kumar, Kannaiah Sathish Suresh
Ahmad, Mohd. Hafizi
M. Piah, M. Afendi
Space charge and conductivity measurement of XLPE nanocomposites for HVDC insulation-permittivity as a nanofiller selection parameter
description Cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) insulation is successfully used for high-voltage AC transmission. However, it is still under development for high-voltage DC application due to space charge accumulation, which distorts the internal electrical field distribution and leads to its aging/failure. Therefore, the space charge should be measured and carefully analysed. On the other side, conductivity measurement helps to forecast the degradation probability of the insulation. Higher conductivity represents the severe degradation. Nanofiller addition, such as SiO2, TiO2, MgO and so on (< 5 wt%), particularly surface-modified nanofiller due to its better dispersion significantly suppresses the space charge accumulation and conductivity. Nevertheless, the choice of suitable nanofiller has still remained a challenge. With this context, space charge and conductivity of XLPE-silica and XLPEmagnesium oxide (MgO) surface-modified nanocomposites are measured. This study proposes a parameter for nanofiller selection that will deliver optimal properties for the intended application. Results show that nanocomposites with higher nanofiller permittivity (i.e. MgO) have less space charge accumulation and low conductivity and are justified with the help of a band gap theory model.
format Article
author Sharad, Paramane Ashish
Kumar, Kannaiah Sathish Suresh
Ahmad, Mohd. Hafizi
M. Piah, M. Afendi
author_facet Sharad, Paramane Ashish
Kumar, Kannaiah Sathish Suresh
Ahmad, Mohd. Hafizi
M. Piah, M. Afendi
author_sort Sharad, Paramane Ashish
title Space charge and conductivity measurement of XLPE nanocomposites for HVDC insulation-permittivity as a nanofiller selection parameter
title_short Space charge and conductivity measurement of XLPE nanocomposites for HVDC insulation-permittivity as a nanofiller selection parameter
title_full Space charge and conductivity measurement of XLPE nanocomposites for HVDC insulation-permittivity as a nanofiller selection parameter
title_fullStr Space charge and conductivity measurement of XLPE nanocomposites for HVDC insulation-permittivity as a nanofiller selection parameter
title_full_unstemmed Space charge and conductivity measurement of XLPE nanocomposites for HVDC insulation-permittivity as a nanofiller selection parameter
title_sort space charge and conductivity measurement of xlpe nanocomposites for hvdc insulation-permittivity as a nanofiller selection parameter
publisher Institution of Engineering and Technology
publishDate 2018
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/84555/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-smt.2018.5134
_version_ 1662754274266841088
score 13.209306