Assessing Climate Change Mitigation Proposals for Malaysia: Implications for Emissions and Abatement Costs

In accordance with the Paris Accord to cap global temperature rise to1.5°Celsius over the next 100 years, Malaysia submitted its Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) seeking to reduce emissions by 45% by 2030, which...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rasiah, R., Al-Amin, A. Q., Mintz Habib, N., Chowdhury, A. H., Ramu, S. C., Ahmed, F., Filho, W. L.
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier Ltd. 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/81363/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.182
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.81363
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.813632019-08-04T03:34:08Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/81363/ Assessing Climate Change Mitigation Proposals for Malaysia: Implications for Emissions and Abatement Costs Rasiah, R. Al-Amin, A. Q. Mintz Habib, N. Chowdhury, A. H. Ramu, S. C. Ahmed, F. Filho, W. L. HD28 Management. Industrial Management In accordance with the Paris Accord to cap global temperature rise to1.5°Celsius over the next 100 years, Malaysia submitted its Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) seeking to reduce emissions by 45% by 2030, which was changed to 2050 following the Marrakech Proclamation in 2016. This paper analyzes the implications of Malaysia's INDC and an additional proposal of continuing further climate control to cap temperature rise over the next century against the existing scenario in the country. The results show that the cumulative damage from climate change over the period 2010–2100 will amount to MYR2.1 billion under the present climatic regime. It will fall to MYR1.1 billion under scenario 2 and to MYR0.6 billion under scenario 3. Since the total abatement costs for scenario 2 (MYR14.3 billion) is close to that of scenario 3 (MYR14.6 billion) against the significant reduction in climate damage of the latter, the third proposal is the best alternative for Malaysia. Elsevier Ltd. 2018 Article PeerReviewed Rasiah, R. and Al-Amin, A. Q. and Mintz Habib, N. and Chowdhury, A. H. and Ramu, S. C. and Ahmed, F. and Filho, W. L. (2018) Assessing Climate Change Mitigation Proposals for Malaysia: Implications for Emissions and Abatement Costs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167 . pp. 163-173. ISSN 0959-6526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.182 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.182
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic HD28 Management. Industrial Management
spellingShingle HD28 Management. Industrial Management
Rasiah, R.
Al-Amin, A. Q.
Mintz Habib, N.
Chowdhury, A. H.
Ramu, S. C.
Ahmed, F.
Filho, W. L.
Assessing Climate Change Mitigation Proposals for Malaysia: Implications for Emissions and Abatement Costs
description In accordance with the Paris Accord to cap global temperature rise to1.5°Celsius over the next 100 years, Malaysia submitted its Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) seeking to reduce emissions by 45% by 2030, which was changed to 2050 following the Marrakech Proclamation in 2016. This paper analyzes the implications of Malaysia's INDC and an additional proposal of continuing further climate control to cap temperature rise over the next century against the existing scenario in the country. The results show that the cumulative damage from climate change over the period 2010–2100 will amount to MYR2.1 billion under the present climatic regime. It will fall to MYR1.1 billion under scenario 2 and to MYR0.6 billion under scenario 3. Since the total abatement costs for scenario 2 (MYR14.3 billion) is close to that of scenario 3 (MYR14.6 billion) against the significant reduction in climate damage of the latter, the third proposal is the best alternative for Malaysia.
format Article
author Rasiah, R.
Al-Amin, A. Q.
Mintz Habib, N.
Chowdhury, A. H.
Ramu, S. C.
Ahmed, F.
Filho, W. L.
author_facet Rasiah, R.
Al-Amin, A. Q.
Mintz Habib, N.
Chowdhury, A. H.
Ramu, S. C.
Ahmed, F.
Filho, W. L.
author_sort Rasiah, R.
title Assessing Climate Change Mitigation Proposals for Malaysia: Implications for Emissions and Abatement Costs
title_short Assessing Climate Change Mitigation Proposals for Malaysia: Implications for Emissions and Abatement Costs
title_full Assessing Climate Change Mitigation Proposals for Malaysia: Implications for Emissions and Abatement Costs
title_fullStr Assessing Climate Change Mitigation Proposals for Malaysia: Implications for Emissions and Abatement Costs
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Climate Change Mitigation Proposals for Malaysia: Implications for Emissions and Abatement Costs
title_sort assessing climate change mitigation proposals for malaysia: implications for emissions and abatement costs
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
publishDate 2018
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/81363/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.182
_version_ 1643658688301367296
score 13.188404