Comparative study of different window sizes setting in median filter for off-angle iris recognition
Iris recognition is one of the most popular biometric recognition that has increased in the number of acceptance user gradually because of the reliability and accuracy provided by this system. However, this accuracy is highly correlated with the quality of iris image captured. Thus, a poor quality o...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Insight Society
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/81231/1/RohayantiHassan2017_ComparativeStudyofDifferentWindowSizes.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/81231/ http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.7.5.3393 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.utm.81231 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utm.812312019-07-24T03:37:28Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/81231/ Comparative study of different window sizes setting in median filter for off-angle iris recognition Hassan, R. Kasim, S. Esa, N. M. Zakaria, Z. QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science Iris recognition is one of the most popular biometric recognition that has increased in the number of acceptance user gradually because of the reliability and accuracy provided by this system. However, this accuracy is highly correlated with the quality of iris image captured. Thus, a poor quality of the image captured required an enhancement technique. This study aims to identify the optimum window size for the median filter. Identifying the optimum window size setting required template matching value result of the off-angle iris recognition. The lowest value obtained showed that the window size applied was optimized. The result of this study demonstrated, for WVU-OA dataset for 15 degrees off-angle iris of right and left eyes, the window size of [5 5] and [7 7] respectively are optimum to maximize the median filter function. Meanwhile, for 30 degrees off-angle iris of right and left eyes data, the optimum windows size proposed are [7 7] and [5 5] respectively. On the other hand, analysis using UBIRIS dataset showed that the optimum window size for 30 degrees off-angle iris, both right and left eye is [7 7] which is able to maximize the performance of the median filter. In conclusion, the effective value to be applied to all dataset are [5 5] and [7 7] because in most cases it provides a better template matching compared to without applying the filtering method. Insight Society 2017 Article NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/81231/1/RohayantiHassan2017_ComparativeStudyofDifferentWindowSizes.pdf Hassan, R. and Kasim, S. and Esa, N. M. and Zakaria, Z. (2017) Comparative study of different window sizes setting in median filter for off-angle iris recognition. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 7 (5). pp. 1638-1643. ISSN 2088-5334 http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.7.5.3393 DOI:10.18517/ijaseit.7.5.3393 |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
building |
UTM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
content_source |
UTM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utm.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science |
spellingShingle |
QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science Hassan, R. Kasim, S. Esa, N. M. Zakaria, Z. Comparative study of different window sizes setting in median filter for off-angle iris recognition |
description |
Iris recognition is one of the most popular biometric recognition that has increased in the number of acceptance user gradually because of the reliability and accuracy provided by this system. However, this accuracy is highly correlated with the quality of iris image captured. Thus, a poor quality of the image captured required an enhancement technique. This study aims to identify the optimum window size for the median filter. Identifying the optimum window size setting required template matching value result of the off-angle iris recognition. The lowest value obtained showed that the window size applied was optimized. The result of this study demonstrated, for WVU-OA dataset for 15 degrees off-angle iris of right and left eyes, the window size of [5 5] and [7 7] respectively are optimum to maximize the median filter function. Meanwhile, for 30 degrees off-angle iris of right and left eyes data, the optimum windows size proposed are [7 7] and [5 5] respectively. On the other hand, analysis using UBIRIS dataset showed that the optimum window size for 30 degrees off-angle iris, both right and left eye is [7 7] which is able to maximize the performance of the median filter. In conclusion, the effective value to be applied to all dataset are [5 5] and [7 7] because in most cases it provides a better template matching compared to without applying the filtering method. |
format |
Article |
author |
Hassan, R. Kasim, S. Esa, N. M. Zakaria, Z. |
author_facet |
Hassan, R. Kasim, S. Esa, N. M. Zakaria, Z. |
author_sort |
Hassan, R. |
title |
Comparative study of different window sizes setting in median filter for off-angle iris recognition |
title_short |
Comparative study of different window sizes setting in median filter for off-angle iris recognition |
title_full |
Comparative study of different window sizes setting in median filter for off-angle iris recognition |
title_fullStr |
Comparative study of different window sizes setting in median filter for off-angle iris recognition |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative study of different window sizes setting in median filter for off-angle iris recognition |
title_sort |
comparative study of different window sizes setting in median filter for off-angle iris recognition |
publisher |
Insight Society |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/81231/1/RohayantiHassan2017_ComparativeStudyofDifferentWindowSizes.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/81231/ http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.7.5.3393 |
_version_ |
1643658649279660032 |
score |
13.214268 |