A comparative analysis on the performance of Lehman type II inverse Gaussian model and standard inverse Gaussian model in terms of flexibility

Searching for flexible parametric models is often the concern of statisticians in data analysis. In order to provide significantly skewed, flexible and heavy-tails models, more parameters are introduced into the existing models. In this paper, a novel univariate model called Lehmann type II inverse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amusan, Ajitoni S., Khalid, Zarina M.
Format: Article
Published: Research India Publications 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/74203/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85002721803&partnerID=40&md5=e24c18c06ba1e2e7b4d88ab8e213e18a
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.74203
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.742032017-11-28T05:01:10Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/74203/ A comparative analysis on the performance of Lehman type II inverse Gaussian model and standard inverse Gaussian model in terms of flexibility Amusan, Ajitoni S. Khalid, Zarina M. QA Mathematics Searching for flexible parametric models is often the concern of statisticians in data analysis. In order to provide significantly skewed, flexible and heavy-tails models, more parameters are introduced into the existing models. In this paper, a novel univariate model called Lehmann type II inverse Gaussian model is constructed from standard inverse Gaussian distribution. The performance of the new distribution in terms of flexibility is compared with that of the baseline distribution. The construction of the new distribution is achieved by adding a shape parameter to the standard inverse Gaussian through dual transformation of the exponentiated generalized class of distributions. The idea is to verify if the Lehman type II inverse Gaussian model would perform better than the inverse Gaussian distribution in modeling real life situations. Various basic statistical properties of the proposed distribution, including the likelihood function are derived. Parameter estimates are obtained via maximum likelihood estimation method. The ratio of maximized likelihoods and Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) are employed to select the best model. In conclusion, when the two models are applied to two known real lifetime data sets, Lehmann inverse Gaussian shows more flexibility in modeling skew data than inverse Gaussian distribution as evident in the negative sign of likelihoods ratio and lower value of AIC. Research India Publications 2016 Article PeerReviewed Amusan, Ajitoni S. and Khalid, Zarina M. (2016) A comparative analysis on the performance of Lehman type II inverse Gaussian model and standard inverse Gaussian model in terms of flexibility. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 12 (5). pp. 4535-4552. ISSN 0973-1768 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85002721803&partnerID=40&md5=e24c18c06ba1e2e7b4d88ab8e213e18a
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic QA Mathematics
spellingShingle QA Mathematics
Amusan, Ajitoni S.
Khalid, Zarina M.
A comparative analysis on the performance of Lehman type II inverse Gaussian model and standard inverse Gaussian model in terms of flexibility
description Searching for flexible parametric models is often the concern of statisticians in data analysis. In order to provide significantly skewed, flexible and heavy-tails models, more parameters are introduced into the existing models. In this paper, a novel univariate model called Lehmann type II inverse Gaussian model is constructed from standard inverse Gaussian distribution. The performance of the new distribution in terms of flexibility is compared with that of the baseline distribution. The construction of the new distribution is achieved by adding a shape parameter to the standard inverse Gaussian through dual transformation of the exponentiated generalized class of distributions. The idea is to verify if the Lehman type II inverse Gaussian model would perform better than the inverse Gaussian distribution in modeling real life situations. Various basic statistical properties of the proposed distribution, including the likelihood function are derived. Parameter estimates are obtained via maximum likelihood estimation method. The ratio of maximized likelihoods and Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) are employed to select the best model. In conclusion, when the two models are applied to two known real lifetime data sets, Lehmann inverse Gaussian shows more flexibility in modeling skew data than inverse Gaussian distribution as evident in the negative sign of likelihoods ratio and lower value of AIC.
format Article
author Amusan, Ajitoni S.
Khalid, Zarina M.
author_facet Amusan, Ajitoni S.
Khalid, Zarina M.
author_sort Amusan, Ajitoni S.
title A comparative analysis on the performance of Lehman type II inverse Gaussian model and standard inverse Gaussian model in terms of flexibility
title_short A comparative analysis on the performance of Lehman type II inverse Gaussian model and standard inverse Gaussian model in terms of flexibility
title_full A comparative analysis on the performance of Lehman type II inverse Gaussian model and standard inverse Gaussian model in terms of flexibility
title_fullStr A comparative analysis on the performance of Lehman type II inverse Gaussian model and standard inverse Gaussian model in terms of flexibility
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis on the performance of Lehman type II inverse Gaussian model and standard inverse Gaussian model in terms of flexibility
title_sort comparative analysis on the performance of lehman type ii inverse gaussian model and standard inverse gaussian model in terms of flexibility
publisher Research India Publications
publishDate 2016
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/74203/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85002721803&partnerID=40&md5=e24c18c06ba1e2e7b4d88ab8e213e18a
_version_ 1643656814668021760
score 13.160551