Surface modifications of agrowaste biomass for Hg(II) and MeHg(II) removal from aqueous solution, oilfield produced water and natural gas condensate

The removal process of Hg(II) and MeHg(II) from aqueous solution by surface modified agrowaste biomass (AWB) was studied. The surface modifications were carried out by methods of mercerization, oxidative delignification, acid treatment, and biological treatment using laccase. The modifications promo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saman, Norasikin, Johari, Khairiraihanna, Song, Shiow Tien, Mat, Hanapi
Format: Article
Published: Springer Verlag 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/73899/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84958057706&doi=10.1007%2fs12665-015-5174-0&partnerID=40&md5=1a367c984bbc5cdf51adf3c0cc288ad1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.73899
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.738992017-11-21T08:17:13Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/73899/ Surface modifications of agrowaste biomass for Hg(II) and MeHg(II) removal from aqueous solution, oilfield produced water and natural gas condensate Saman, Norasikin Johari, Khairiraihanna Song, Shiow Tien Mat, Hanapi TP Chemical technology The removal process of Hg(II) and MeHg(II) from aqueous solution by surface modified agrowaste biomass (AWB) was studied. The surface modifications were carried out by methods of mercerization, oxidative delignification, acid treatment, and biological treatment using laccase. The modifications promoted disruption of AWB structural surfaces and thus changed their physical and chemical properties as well as Hg(II) and MeHg(II) adsorption performances. The adsorption efficiency of Hg(II) was higher than MeHg(II) for all AWB adsorbents. The adsorption capacity of Hg(II) and MeHg(II) for AWB-Pure was 0.97 and 0.17 mmol/g, respectively. The highest adsorption capacity of Hg(II) and MeHg(II) was respectively observed for the AWB-Laccase (0.98 ± 0.04 mmol/g) and AWB-NaOCl/NaOH (0.40 ± 0.07 mmol/g). The adsorption selectivity of modified AWB adsorbents towards Hg(II) and MeHg(II) studied using oilfield produced water and natural gas condensate samples was found to be lower as compared to AWB-Pure, but higher selectivity was observed for other metals. The renewability studies show that the pure and modified AWB adsorbents had similar adsorption performance characteristics. The high Hg(II) adsorption efficiency (η > 90 %) was observed up to the third adsorption cycle, while for the MeHg(II), it decreased after each adsorption–desorption cycle. Springer Verlag 2016 Article PeerReviewed Saman, Norasikin and Johari, Khairiraihanna and Song, Shiow Tien and Mat, Hanapi (2016) Surface modifications of agrowaste biomass for Hg(II) and MeHg(II) removal from aqueous solution, oilfield produced water and natural gas condensate. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75 (4). pp. 1-12. ISSN 1866-6280 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84958057706&doi=10.1007%2fs12665-015-5174-0&partnerID=40&md5=1a367c984bbc5cdf51adf3c0cc288ad1
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic TP Chemical technology
spellingShingle TP Chemical technology
Saman, Norasikin
Johari, Khairiraihanna
Song, Shiow Tien
Mat, Hanapi
Surface modifications of agrowaste biomass for Hg(II) and MeHg(II) removal from aqueous solution, oilfield produced water and natural gas condensate
description The removal process of Hg(II) and MeHg(II) from aqueous solution by surface modified agrowaste biomass (AWB) was studied. The surface modifications were carried out by methods of mercerization, oxidative delignification, acid treatment, and biological treatment using laccase. The modifications promoted disruption of AWB structural surfaces and thus changed their physical and chemical properties as well as Hg(II) and MeHg(II) adsorption performances. The adsorption efficiency of Hg(II) was higher than MeHg(II) for all AWB adsorbents. The adsorption capacity of Hg(II) and MeHg(II) for AWB-Pure was 0.97 and 0.17 mmol/g, respectively. The highest adsorption capacity of Hg(II) and MeHg(II) was respectively observed for the AWB-Laccase (0.98 ± 0.04 mmol/g) and AWB-NaOCl/NaOH (0.40 ± 0.07 mmol/g). The adsorption selectivity of modified AWB adsorbents towards Hg(II) and MeHg(II) studied using oilfield produced water and natural gas condensate samples was found to be lower as compared to AWB-Pure, but higher selectivity was observed for other metals. The renewability studies show that the pure and modified AWB adsorbents had similar adsorption performance characteristics. The high Hg(II) adsorption efficiency (η > 90 %) was observed up to the third adsorption cycle, while for the MeHg(II), it decreased after each adsorption–desorption cycle.
format Article
author Saman, Norasikin
Johari, Khairiraihanna
Song, Shiow Tien
Mat, Hanapi
author_facet Saman, Norasikin
Johari, Khairiraihanna
Song, Shiow Tien
Mat, Hanapi
author_sort Saman, Norasikin
title Surface modifications of agrowaste biomass for Hg(II) and MeHg(II) removal from aqueous solution, oilfield produced water and natural gas condensate
title_short Surface modifications of agrowaste biomass for Hg(II) and MeHg(II) removal from aqueous solution, oilfield produced water and natural gas condensate
title_full Surface modifications of agrowaste biomass for Hg(II) and MeHg(II) removal from aqueous solution, oilfield produced water and natural gas condensate
title_fullStr Surface modifications of agrowaste biomass for Hg(II) and MeHg(II) removal from aqueous solution, oilfield produced water and natural gas condensate
title_full_unstemmed Surface modifications of agrowaste biomass for Hg(II) and MeHg(II) removal from aqueous solution, oilfield produced water and natural gas condensate
title_sort surface modifications of agrowaste biomass for hg(ii) and mehg(ii) removal from aqueous solution, oilfield produced water and natural gas condensate
publisher Springer Verlag
publishDate 2016
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/73899/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84958057706&doi=10.1007%2fs12665-015-5174-0&partnerID=40&md5=1a367c984bbc5cdf51adf3c0cc288ad1
_version_ 1643656778203791360
score 13.159267