Derivation of Morison's force coefficients by three alternative forms of the method of moments

Morison's equation is the most widely used method of predicting wave forces on slim cylindrical members of offshore structures. The equation assumes that the wave force is composed of two components: a drag force and an inertial force, where the drag component is due to water particle velocity...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohd. Zaki, N. I., Abu Husain, M. K., Najafian, G.
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Published: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/73642/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84996593387&doi=10.1115%2fOMAE2016-54201&partnerID=40&md5=499dc3c550bffbe6f7f1ef85106240ae
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.73642
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.736422017-11-28T06:50:01Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/73642/ Derivation of Morison's force coefficients by three alternative forms of the method of moments Mohd. Zaki, N. I. Abu Husain, M. K. Najafian, G. T Technology (General) Morison's equation is the most widely used method of predicting wave forces on slim cylindrical members of offshore structures. The equation assumes that the wave force is composed of two components: a drag force and an inertial force, where the drag component is due to water particle velocity and the inertial component is due to water particle acceleration. Morison's equation has two empirical coefficients, which are usually referred to as the drag and inertia coefficients. The values of these empirical coefficients are determined from laboratory and/or field experiments. In a typical wave load investigation, the wave force together with corresponding water particle velocity and acceleration are measured. The measured data is then analysed to calculate constant values for drag and inertia coefficients. One of the methods used in derivation of these coefficients is the (conventional) method of moments. However, the coefficients obtained from this method show considerable scatter due to large sampling variability. The purpose of this paper is to compare the sampling variability of drag and inertia coefficients from the conventional method of moments with those derived from two alternative forms of the method, i.e. methods of linear and low-order moments. Simulated data has been used to compare the efficiency of the three methods of moments. The results indicate that in most cases, the method of linear moments is superior to the other two methods. This is particularly true for drag-dominated forces. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2016 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed Mohd. Zaki, N. I. and Abu Husain, M. K. and Najafian, G. (2016) Derivation of Morison's force coefficients by three alternative forms of the method of moments. In: ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE 2016, 19-24 June 2016, Busan, South Korea. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84996593387&doi=10.1115%2fOMAE2016-54201&partnerID=40&md5=499dc3c550bffbe6f7f1ef85106240ae
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic T Technology (General)
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
Mohd. Zaki, N. I.
Abu Husain, M. K.
Najafian, G.
Derivation of Morison's force coefficients by three alternative forms of the method of moments
description Morison's equation is the most widely used method of predicting wave forces on slim cylindrical members of offshore structures. The equation assumes that the wave force is composed of two components: a drag force and an inertial force, where the drag component is due to water particle velocity and the inertial component is due to water particle acceleration. Morison's equation has two empirical coefficients, which are usually referred to as the drag and inertia coefficients. The values of these empirical coefficients are determined from laboratory and/or field experiments. In a typical wave load investigation, the wave force together with corresponding water particle velocity and acceleration are measured. The measured data is then analysed to calculate constant values for drag and inertia coefficients. One of the methods used in derivation of these coefficients is the (conventional) method of moments. However, the coefficients obtained from this method show considerable scatter due to large sampling variability. The purpose of this paper is to compare the sampling variability of drag and inertia coefficients from the conventional method of moments with those derived from two alternative forms of the method, i.e. methods of linear and low-order moments. Simulated data has been used to compare the efficiency of the three methods of moments. The results indicate that in most cases, the method of linear moments is superior to the other two methods. This is particularly true for drag-dominated forces.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Mohd. Zaki, N. I.
Abu Husain, M. K.
Najafian, G.
author_facet Mohd. Zaki, N. I.
Abu Husain, M. K.
Najafian, G.
author_sort Mohd. Zaki, N. I.
title Derivation of Morison's force coefficients by three alternative forms of the method of moments
title_short Derivation of Morison's force coefficients by three alternative forms of the method of moments
title_full Derivation of Morison's force coefficients by three alternative forms of the method of moments
title_fullStr Derivation of Morison's force coefficients by three alternative forms of the method of moments
title_full_unstemmed Derivation of Morison's force coefficients by three alternative forms of the method of moments
title_sort derivation of morison's force coefficients by three alternative forms of the method of moments
publisher American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
publishDate 2016
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/73642/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84996593387&doi=10.1115%2fOMAE2016-54201&partnerID=40&md5=499dc3c550bffbe6f7f1ef85106240ae
_version_ 1643656708573102080
score 13.188404