Social media usage in academic research

Recently researchers have used “conversation prism” and “social media prisma”, to consolidate social medias with respect to their use. Although both identified 25 types, having average five examples each, they did not identify contribution of each type in academic research. Moreover some of mentione...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khan, M. M., Ghani, I., Jeong, S. R., Ibrahim, R., Habib-Ur-Rehman, Habib-Ur-Rehman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Asian Research Publishing Network 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/72576/1/MuhammadMuradKhan2016_SocialMediaUsageinAcademicResearch.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/72576/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84969506228&partnerID=40&md5=758811ef40d2b331d2beb5ab225a5507
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.72576
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.725762017-11-28T04:41:40Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/72576/ Social media usage in academic research Khan, M. M. Ghani, I. Jeong, S. R. Ibrahim, R. Habib-Ur-Rehman, Habib-Ur-Rehman QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science Recently researchers have used “conversation prism” and “social media prisma”, to consolidate social medias with respect to their use. Although both identified 25 types, having average five examples each, they did not identify contribution of each type in academic research. Moreover some of mentioned social services had been suspended or changed. In this paper we attempt to access each social media mentioned in conversation prism in order to first, identify services that are operational to date, services which have suspended and those which have changed during course of time. Second, we compare number of publications associated with each social media, in order to identify which social media has contributed most to academic research. Third, we attempt to find correlation between number of publications and development tools provided by respective social applications. Fourth, social medias are ranked with respect to number of times other social medias share content with respective social application. It was found that out of 168 social applications, 10% changed their service objective while 13% were suspended. Among all social application, AMAZON had highest i.e. 147,000 number of citations on Google scholar whereas 90.7% of total citations were contributed by top 30 social medias. For developers, 22 out of top 30 social medias provided developer options in form of either application programming interface (API) or software development kits (SDK) and Facebook was found to be most cross referred social media based on content sharing. Finally conclusion and future work of study is presented. Asian Research Publishing Network 2016 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/72576/1/MuhammadMuradKhan2016_SocialMediaUsageinAcademicResearch.pdf Khan, M. M. and Ghani, I. and Jeong, S. R. and Ibrahim, R. and Habib-Ur-Rehman, Habib-Ur-Rehman (2016) Social media usage in academic research. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 87 (2). pp. 191-197. ISSN 1992-8645 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84969506228&partnerID=40&md5=758811ef40d2b331d2beb5ab225a5507
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
language English
topic QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
spellingShingle QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Khan, M. M.
Ghani, I.
Jeong, S. R.
Ibrahim, R.
Habib-Ur-Rehman, Habib-Ur-Rehman
Social media usage in academic research
description Recently researchers have used “conversation prism” and “social media prisma”, to consolidate social medias with respect to their use. Although both identified 25 types, having average five examples each, they did not identify contribution of each type in academic research. Moreover some of mentioned social services had been suspended or changed. In this paper we attempt to access each social media mentioned in conversation prism in order to first, identify services that are operational to date, services which have suspended and those which have changed during course of time. Second, we compare number of publications associated with each social media, in order to identify which social media has contributed most to academic research. Third, we attempt to find correlation between number of publications and development tools provided by respective social applications. Fourth, social medias are ranked with respect to number of times other social medias share content with respective social application. It was found that out of 168 social applications, 10% changed their service objective while 13% were suspended. Among all social application, AMAZON had highest i.e. 147,000 number of citations on Google scholar whereas 90.7% of total citations were contributed by top 30 social medias. For developers, 22 out of top 30 social medias provided developer options in form of either application programming interface (API) or software development kits (SDK) and Facebook was found to be most cross referred social media based on content sharing. Finally conclusion and future work of study is presented.
format Article
author Khan, M. M.
Ghani, I.
Jeong, S. R.
Ibrahim, R.
Habib-Ur-Rehman, Habib-Ur-Rehman
author_facet Khan, M. M.
Ghani, I.
Jeong, S. R.
Ibrahim, R.
Habib-Ur-Rehman, Habib-Ur-Rehman
author_sort Khan, M. M.
title Social media usage in academic research
title_short Social media usage in academic research
title_full Social media usage in academic research
title_fullStr Social media usage in academic research
title_full_unstemmed Social media usage in academic research
title_sort social media usage in academic research
publisher Asian Research Publishing Network
publishDate 2016
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/72576/1/MuhammadMuradKhan2016_SocialMediaUsageinAcademicResearch.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/72576/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84969506228&partnerID=40&md5=758811ef40d2b331d2beb5ab225a5507
_version_ 1643656472456855552
score 13.160551