Requirement prioritization approaches and evaluation strategies: a systematic literature review

Requirements prioritization is one of process in requirement engineering which aim to manage the order of urgency and implementation a set of requirements. Requirement prioritization also used in software development project to cope with the limited resources allocated. Many research have been done...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seyed Fadzir, S. F., Ibrahim, S., Mahrin, M. N
Format: Article
Published: Medwell Journals 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/71704/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84995550233&doi=10.3923%2fjeasci.2016.1201.1205&partnerID=40&md5=54ba658a52ad0a1d5a271d4dd16e4c51
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.71704
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.717042017-11-16T06:03:30Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/71704/ Requirement prioritization approaches and evaluation strategies: a systematic literature review Seyed Fadzir, S. F. Ibrahim, S. Mahrin, M. N TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Requirements prioritization is one of process in requirement engineering which aim to manage the order of urgency and implementation a set of requirements. Requirement prioritization also used in software development project to cope with the limited resources allocated. Many research have been done at industrial and academic level in this particular area. There are many techniques applied by using several approaches. However, the evaluation towards the effectiveness and efficiency of these available techniques still can be examined. There is a need to identify the approaches used and the evaluation performed towards these techniques. A comprehensive and systematic exploration to distinguish the state-of-the-art approaches been used to develop, as well as methods used to evaluate those prioritization techniques is planned. The plan is elaborated in detail within this paper by using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) protocol. Initial finding for this planning phase for SLR is a collection of scrutinized and significant research literatures. The extracted data from these literatures later will be used to summarize state of the art approaches to develop techniques for prioritizing requirement. Additionally, findings about the evaluations strategy will serve as a basis for researcher's perception in planning their research. It also will benefited the practitioners to choose a high quality and evaluated techniques. Furthermore, the findings will be useful for the researcher and academician to discover the knowledge gap for their future research and contribution. Medwell Journals 2016 Article PeerReviewed Seyed Fadzir, S. F. and Ibrahim, S. and Mahrin, M. N (2016) Requirement prioritization approaches and evaluation strategies: a systematic literature review. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11 (6). pp. 1201-1205. ISSN 1816-949X https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84995550233&doi=10.3923%2fjeasci.2016.1201.1205&partnerID=40&md5=54ba658a52ad0a1d5a271d4dd16e4c51
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Seyed Fadzir, S. F.
Ibrahim, S.
Mahrin, M. N
Requirement prioritization approaches and evaluation strategies: a systematic literature review
description Requirements prioritization is one of process in requirement engineering which aim to manage the order of urgency and implementation a set of requirements. Requirement prioritization also used in software development project to cope with the limited resources allocated. Many research have been done at industrial and academic level in this particular area. There are many techniques applied by using several approaches. However, the evaluation towards the effectiveness and efficiency of these available techniques still can be examined. There is a need to identify the approaches used and the evaluation performed towards these techniques. A comprehensive and systematic exploration to distinguish the state-of-the-art approaches been used to develop, as well as methods used to evaluate those prioritization techniques is planned. The plan is elaborated in detail within this paper by using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) protocol. Initial finding for this planning phase for SLR is a collection of scrutinized and significant research literatures. The extracted data from these literatures later will be used to summarize state of the art approaches to develop techniques for prioritizing requirement. Additionally, findings about the evaluations strategy will serve as a basis for researcher's perception in planning their research. It also will benefited the practitioners to choose a high quality and evaluated techniques. Furthermore, the findings will be useful for the researcher and academician to discover the knowledge gap for their future research and contribution.
format Article
author Seyed Fadzir, S. F.
Ibrahim, S.
Mahrin, M. N
author_facet Seyed Fadzir, S. F.
Ibrahim, S.
Mahrin, M. N
author_sort Seyed Fadzir, S. F.
title Requirement prioritization approaches and evaluation strategies: a systematic literature review
title_short Requirement prioritization approaches and evaluation strategies: a systematic literature review
title_full Requirement prioritization approaches and evaluation strategies: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr Requirement prioritization approaches and evaluation strategies: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Requirement prioritization approaches and evaluation strategies: a systematic literature review
title_sort requirement prioritization approaches and evaluation strategies: a systematic literature review
publisher Medwell Journals
publishDate 2016
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/71704/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84995550233&doi=10.3923%2fjeasci.2016.1201.1205&partnerID=40&md5=54ba658a52ad0a1d5a271d4dd16e4c51
_version_ 1643656257914011648
score 13.154949