Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel

The performance of a multilayer tungsten carbide tool was described using response surface methodology (RSM) when turning AISI 1045 steel. Cutting tests were performed with constant depth of cut and under dry cutting conditions. The factors investigated were cutting speed, feed and the side cutting...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noordin, M. Y., Venkatesh, V. C., Sharif, S., Elting, S., Abdullah, A.
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier B V 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/6521/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00861-6
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00861-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.6521
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.65212017-10-22T01:58:29Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/6521/ Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel Noordin, M. Y. Venkatesh, V. C. Sharif, S. Elting, S. Abdullah, A. TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery The performance of a multilayer tungsten carbide tool was described using response surface methodology (RSM) when turning AISI 1045 steel. Cutting tests were performed with constant depth of cut and under dry cutting conditions. The factors investigated were cutting speed, feed and the side cutting edge angle (SCEA) of the cutting edge. The main cutting force, i.e. the tangential force and surface roughness were the response variables investigated. The experimental plan was based on the face centred, central composite design (CCD). The experimental results indicate that the proposed mathematical models suggested could adequately describe the performance indicators within the limits of the factors that are being investigated. The feed is the most significant factor that influences the surface roughness and the tangential force. However, there are other factors that provide secondary contributions to the performance indicators. In the case of surface roughness, the SCEA2 and the interaction of feed and SCEA provides these contributions whilst for tangential force, the SCEA2, the interaction of feed and SCEA; and the cutting speed provides them. Elsevier B V 2004-01-01 Article PeerReviewed Noordin, M. Y. and Venkatesh, V. C. and Sharif, S. and Elting, S. and Abdullah, A. (2004) Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 145 (1). pp. 46-58. ISSN 09240136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00861-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00861-6
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
spellingShingle TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
Noordin, M. Y.
Venkatesh, V. C.
Sharif, S.
Elting, S.
Abdullah, A.
Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel
description The performance of a multilayer tungsten carbide tool was described using response surface methodology (RSM) when turning AISI 1045 steel. Cutting tests were performed with constant depth of cut and under dry cutting conditions. The factors investigated were cutting speed, feed and the side cutting edge angle (SCEA) of the cutting edge. The main cutting force, i.e. the tangential force and surface roughness were the response variables investigated. The experimental plan was based on the face centred, central composite design (CCD). The experimental results indicate that the proposed mathematical models suggested could adequately describe the performance indicators within the limits of the factors that are being investigated. The feed is the most significant factor that influences the surface roughness and the tangential force. However, there are other factors that provide secondary contributions to the performance indicators. In the case of surface roughness, the SCEA2 and the interaction of feed and SCEA provides these contributions whilst for tangential force, the SCEA2, the interaction of feed and SCEA; and the cutting speed provides them.
format Article
author Noordin, M. Y.
Venkatesh, V. C.
Sharif, S.
Elting, S.
Abdullah, A.
author_facet Noordin, M. Y.
Venkatesh, V. C.
Sharif, S.
Elting, S.
Abdullah, A.
author_sort Noordin, M. Y.
title Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel
title_short Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel
title_full Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel
title_fullStr Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel
title_full_unstemmed Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel
title_sort application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning aisi 1045 steel
publisher Elsevier B V
publishDate 2004
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/6521/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00861-6
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00861-6
_version_ 1643644574995841024
score 13.187197