Students view on text chats (CH), forum discussion (FR), and online learning interaction (LI)

The objective of this research is to get the students’ opinion on using online forum discussion (FR), text chatting (CH), and online learning interaction (LI). Quantitative and qualitative approaches were used through questionnaires and semi-structured questions which were administered to 133 Social...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamad, Ahmad Muhaimin, Mohd. Yusof, Farahwahida, Aris, Baharuddin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit UTM Press 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/62701/1/FarahwahidaMohdYusof2014_StudentsViewonTextChats%28CH%29.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/62701/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.2872
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.62701
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.627012017-11-01T04:17:10Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/62701/ Students view on text chats (CH), forum discussion (FR), and online learning interaction (LI) Mohamad, Ahmad Muhaimin Mohd. Yusof, Farahwahida Aris, Baharuddin LB Theory and practice of education The objective of this research is to get the students’ opinion on using online forum discussion (FR), text chatting (CH), and online learning interaction (LI). Quantitative and qualitative approaches were used through questionnaires and semi-structured questions which were administered to 133 Social Science students of a Malaysian public university, selected using volunteer random sampling. The result of a descriptive analysis shows that FR was more favoured by the students (mean = 4.11) compared to CH (mean = 3.87) and LI (mean = 4.06). Next, the path analysis found that FR is more significant (r = 0.59, p < .05) compared to CH (r = 0.35, p < .05) towards LI aspect. However, FR and CH are interrelated with critical ratio (C.R) = 6.455, p < .05). Qualitative analysis found that student’s views leaned more towards FR because of its ability to generate meaningful discussions in LI compare to CH according to some of stated reasons. From the perspective of LI, students need a learning environment that encourages them to participate in learning activities actively and involves the lecturer as learning supervisors. The results of analysis explain that the online FR and CH have different perspectives of focus of use. The implication of this study suggests the involvement of students and lecturer during design and development stage of online learning process. Penerbit UTM Press 2014 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/62701/1/FarahwahidaMohdYusof2014_StudentsViewonTextChats%28CH%29.pdf Mohamad, Ahmad Muhaimin and Mohd. Yusof, Farahwahida and Aris, Baharuddin (2014) Students view on text chats (CH), forum discussion (FR), and online learning interaction (LI). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering), 69 (1). pp. 31-38. ISSN 2180-3722 http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.2872 DOI:10.11113/jt.v69.2872
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
language English
topic LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle LB Theory and practice of education
Mohamad, Ahmad Muhaimin
Mohd. Yusof, Farahwahida
Aris, Baharuddin
Students view on text chats (CH), forum discussion (FR), and online learning interaction (LI)
description The objective of this research is to get the students’ opinion on using online forum discussion (FR), text chatting (CH), and online learning interaction (LI). Quantitative and qualitative approaches were used through questionnaires and semi-structured questions which were administered to 133 Social Science students of a Malaysian public university, selected using volunteer random sampling. The result of a descriptive analysis shows that FR was more favoured by the students (mean = 4.11) compared to CH (mean = 3.87) and LI (mean = 4.06). Next, the path analysis found that FR is more significant (r = 0.59, p < .05) compared to CH (r = 0.35, p < .05) towards LI aspect. However, FR and CH are interrelated with critical ratio (C.R) = 6.455, p < .05). Qualitative analysis found that student’s views leaned more towards FR because of its ability to generate meaningful discussions in LI compare to CH according to some of stated reasons. From the perspective of LI, students need a learning environment that encourages them to participate in learning activities actively and involves the lecturer as learning supervisors. The results of analysis explain that the online FR and CH have different perspectives of focus of use. The implication of this study suggests the involvement of students and lecturer during design and development stage of online learning process.
format Article
author Mohamad, Ahmad Muhaimin
Mohd. Yusof, Farahwahida
Aris, Baharuddin
author_facet Mohamad, Ahmad Muhaimin
Mohd. Yusof, Farahwahida
Aris, Baharuddin
author_sort Mohamad, Ahmad Muhaimin
title Students view on text chats (CH), forum discussion (FR), and online learning interaction (LI)
title_short Students view on text chats (CH), forum discussion (FR), and online learning interaction (LI)
title_full Students view on text chats (CH), forum discussion (FR), and online learning interaction (LI)
title_fullStr Students view on text chats (CH), forum discussion (FR), and online learning interaction (LI)
title_full_unstemmed Students view on text chats (CH), forum discussion (FR), and online learning interaction (LI)
title_sort students view on text chats (ch), forum discussion (fr), and online learning interaction (li)
publisher Penerbit UTM Press
publishDate 2014
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/62701/1/FarahwahidaMohdYusof2014_StudentsViewonTextChats%28CH%29.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/62701/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.2872
_version_ 1643655497518153728
score 13.209306