Comparative analysis of ASTER DEM, ASTER GDEM, and SRTM DEM based on ground-truth GPS data

This study aims to compare the accuracies of ASTER DEM, ASTER GDEM, and SRTM DEM for the area of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) and surrounding. In doing so, a number of Ground Control Points (GCPs) were collected using GPS technology and used to generate an absolute DEM using the ASTER stereo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rokni, Komeil, Ahmad, Anuar, Hazini, Sharifeh
Format: Article
Published: Penerbit UTM Press 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/58091/
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.3982
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.58091
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.580912022-01-27T08:23:55Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/58091/ Comparative analysis of ASTER DEM, ASTER GDEM, and SRTM DEM based on ground-truth GPS data Rokni, Komeil Ahmad, Anuar Hazini, Sharifeh HD28 Management. Industrial Management This study aims to compare the accuracies of ASTER DEM, ASTER GDEM, and SRTM DEM for the area of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) and surrounding. In doing so, a number of Ground Control Points (GCPs) were collected using GPS technology and used to generate an absolute DEM using the ASTER stereo imagery. Moreover, two well-known DEMs including ASTER GDEM and SRTM DEM were obtained for the same area with ASTER image. Subsequently, several high accuracy ground-truth points were established around UTM using dual frequency GPS and used to assess the accuracies of the obtained DEMs. The results indicate that an elevation Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of ±14.86m is achieved for the generated ASTER DEM, which is less than the 15m pixel size of ASTER image. The results further show that the elevation RMSEs of the ASTER GDEM and SRTM DEM are respectively ±4.52m and ±4.14m for the study area. The results illustrate although the resolution of SRTM DEM is much lower than ASTER GDEM, it could provide higher elevation accuracy. Finally, although the accuracy of the ASTER DEM in this study is not high in comparison with the accuracies of ASTER GDEM and SRTM DEM, based on the selected number of check points and resolution of ASTER image, it could be useful for various geoinformation applications. Penerbit UTM Press 2015 Article PeerReviewed Rokni, Komeil and Ahmad, Anuar and Hazini, Sharifeh (2015) Comparative analysis of ASTER DEM, ASTER GDEM, and SRTM DEM based on ground-truth GPS data. Jurnal Teknologi, 76 (1). pp. 97-102. ISSN 0127-9696 https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.3982 DOI: 10.11113/jt.v76.3982
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic HD28 Management. Industrial Management
spellingShingle HD28 Management. Industrial Management
Rokni, Komeil
Ahmad, Anuar
Hazini, Sharifeh
Comparative analysis of ASTER DEM, ASTER GDEM, and SRTM DEM based on ground-truth GPS data
description This study aims to compare the accuracies of ASTER DEM, ASTER GDEM, and SRTM DEM for the area of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) and surrounding. In doing so, a number of Ground Control Points (GCPs) were collected using GPS technology and used to generate an absolute DEM using the ASTER stereo imagery. Moreover, two well-known DEMs including ASTER GDEM and SRTM DEM were obtained for the same area with ASTER image. Subsequently, several high accuracy ground-truth points were established around UTM using dual frequency GPS and used to assess the accuracies of the obtained DEMs. The results indicate that an elevation Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of ±14.86m is achieved for the generated ASTER DEM, which is less than the 15m pixel size of ASTER image. The results further show that the elevation RMSEs of the ASTER GDEM and SRTM DEM are respectively ±4.52m and ±4.14m for the study area. The results illustrate although the resolution of SRTM DEM is much lower than ASTER GDEM, it could provide higher elevation accuracy. Finally, although the accuracy of the ASTER DEM in this study is not high in comparison with the accuracies of ASTER GDEM and SRTM DEM, based on the selected number of check points and resolution of ASTER image, it could be useful for various geoinformation applications.
format Article
author Rokni, Komeil
Ahmad, Anuar
Hazini, Sharifeh
author_facet Rokni, Komeil
Ahmad, Anuar
Hazini, Sharifeh
author_sort Rokni, Komeil
title Comparative analysis of ASTER DEM, ASTER GDEM, and SRTM DEM based on ground-truth GPS data
title_short Comparative analysis of ASTER DEM, ASTER GDEM, and SRTM DEM based on ground-truth GPS data
title_full Comparative analysis of ASTER DEM, ASTER GDEM, and SRTM DEM based on ground-truth GPS data
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of ASTER DEM, ASTER GDEM, and SRTM DEM based on ground-truth GPS data
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of ASTER DEM, ASTER GDEM, and SRTM DEM based on ground-truth GPS data
title_sort comparative analysis of aster dem, aster gdem, and srtm dem based on ground-truth gps data
publisher Penerbit UTM Press
publishDate 2015
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/58091/
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.3982
_version_ 1724073237257650176
score 13.160551