A systematic literature review on Enterprise Architecture Implementation Methodologies

Enterprise Architecture (EA) is a strategy to align business and Information Technology (IT) within an enterprise. EA is managed, developed, and maintained throughout the EA Implementation Methodology (EAIM). Objective: The aims of this study are to identify the existing effective practices that are...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rouhani, Babak Darvish, Mahrin, Mohd. Naz'ri, Nikpay, Fatemeh, Ahmad, Rodina, Nikfard, Pourya
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/57677/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.01.012
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.57677
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.576772017-02-01T01:33:57Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/57677/ A systematic literature review on Enterprise Architecture Implementation Methodologies Rouhani, Babak Darvish Mahrin, Mohd. Naz'ri Nikpay, Fatemeh Ahmad, Rodina Nikfard, Pourya QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science Enterprise Architecture (EA) is a strategy to align business and Information Technology (IT) within an enterprise. EA is managed, developed, and maintained throughout the EA Implementation Methodology (EAIM). Objective: The aims of this study are to identify the existing effective practices that are used by existing EAIMs, identify the factors that affect the effectiveness of EAIM, identify the current tools that are used by existing EAIMs, and identify the open problems and areas related to EAIM for improvement. Method: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was carried out. 669 papers were retrieved by a manual search in 6 databases and 46 primary studies were finally included. Result: From these studies 33% were journal articles, 41% were conference papers while 26% were contributions from the studies consisted of book chapters. Consequently, 28 practices, 19 factors, and 15 tools were identified and analysed. Conclusion: Several rigorous researches have been done in order to provide effective EAIM, however there are still problems in components of EAIM, including: there is lack of tool support for whole part of EA implementation, there are deficiency in addressing the EAIM's practices especially in modeling, management, and maintenance, there is lack of consideration on non-functional requirement in existing EAIM, there is no appropriate consideration on requirement analysis in most existing EAIM. This review provides researchers with some guidelines for future research on this topic. It also provides broad information on EAIM, which could be useful for practitioners. Elsevier 2015 Article PeerReviewed Rouhani, Babak Darvish and Mahrin, Mohd. Naz'ri and Nikpay, Fatemeh and Ahmad, Rodina and Nikfard, Pourya (2015) A systematic literature review on Enterprise Architecture Implementation Methodologies. Information and Software Technology, 62 (1). pp. 1-20. ISSN 0950-0693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.01.012 DOI:10.1016/j.infsof.2015.01.012
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
spellingShingle QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Rouhani, Babak Darvish
Mahrin, Mohd. Naz'ri
Nikpay, Fatemeh
Ahmad, Rodina
Nikfard, Pourya
A systematic literature review on Enterprise Architecture Implementation Methodologies
description Enterprise Architecture (EA) is a strategy to align business and Information Technology (IT) within an enterprise. EA is managed, developed, and maintained throughout the EA Implementation Methodology (EAIM). Objective: The aims of this study are to identify the existing effective practices that are used by existing EAIMs, identify the factors that affect the effectiveness of EAIM, identify the current tools that are used by existing EAIMs, and identify the open problems and areas related to EAIM for improvement. Method: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was carried out. 669 papers were retrieved by a manual search in 6 databases and 46 primary studies were finally included. Result: From these studies 33% were journal articles, 41% were conference papers while 26% were contributions from the studies consisted of book chapters. Consequently, 28 practices, 19 factors, and 15 tools were identified and analysed. Conclusion: Several rigorous researches have been done in order to provide effective EAIM, however there are still problems in components of EAIM, including: there is lack of tool support for whole part of EA implementation, there are deficiency in addressing the EAIM's practices especially in modeling, management, and maintenance, there is lack of consideration on non-functional requirement in existing EAIM, there is no appropriate consideration on requirement analysis in most existing EAIM. This review provides researchers with some guidelines for future research on this topic. It also provides broad information on EAIM, which could be useful for practitioners.
format Article
author Rouhani, Babak Darvish
Mahrin, Mohd. Naz'ri
Nikpay, Fatemeh
Ahmad, Rodina
Nikfard, Pourya
author_facet Rouhani, Babak Darvish
Mahrin, Mohd. Naz'ri
Nikpay, Fatemeh
Ahmad, Rodina
Nikfard, Pourya
author_sort Rouhani, Babak Darvish
title A systematic literature review on Enterprise Architecture Implementation Methodologies
title_short A systematic literature review on Enterprise Architecture Implementation Methodologies
title_full A systematic literature review on Enterprise Architecture Implementation Methodologies
title_fullStr A systematic literature review on Enterprise Architecture Implementation Methodologies
title_full_unstemmed A systematic literature review on Enterprise Architecture Implementation Methodologies
title_sort systematic literature review on enterprise architecture implementation methodologies
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2015
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/57677/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.01.012
_version_ 1643654047549358080
score 13.209306