Remote detection of flowering Somei Yoshino (Prunus x yedoensis) in an urban park using IKONOS imagery: comparison of hard and soft classifiers

Identification of flowering trees in urban areas is challenging due to weak spectral signals and the high heterogeneity of urban landscapes. We hypothesized that a soft classifier, such as mixture tuned matched filtering (MTMF), would be better able to identify pixels including blooming cherry trees...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hassan, Noordyana, Numata, Shinya, Hosaka, Tetsuro, Hashim, Mazlan
Format: Article
Published: SPIE 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/54870/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.9.096046
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.54870
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.548702016-08-24T06:13:06Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/54870/ Remote detection of flowering Somei Yoshino (Prunus x yedoensis) in an urban park using IKONOS imagery: comparison of hard and soft classifiers Hassan, Noordyana Numata, Shinya Hosaka, Tetsuro Hashim, Mazlan G70.39-70.6 Remote sensing Identification of flowering trees in urban areas is challenging due to weak spectral signals and the high heterogeneity of urban landscapes. We hypothesized that a soft classifier, such as mixture tuned matched filtering (MTMF), would be better able to identify pixels including blooming cherry trees than a hard classifier such as maximum likelihood (ML). To test this hypothesis, we compared the accuracy of MTMF and ML in classifying blossoms of Somei Yoshino cherry trees (Prunus × yedoensis) in an urban park in Tokyo using IKONOS imagery. An accuracy assessment demonstrated that the MTMF classifier (overall accuracy: 62.2%, kappa coefficient: 0.507, and user's accuracy of SY: 48.1%) performed better than ML in identifying flowering SY (overall accuracy 48.7% with kappa accuracy: 0.321 and user's accuracy of blooming SY: 38.9%). Our results suggest that both methods are able to classify cherry blossoms in an urban landscape, but MTMF is more accurate than ML. However, the producer's accuracy of MTMF (72.7%) was slightly lower than ML (77.7%), suggesting that the accuracy of MTMF could decrease due to the limited number of available bands (four for IKONOS) and the existence of endmembers, such as dry grass in this study, with stronger signals than flowers. SPIE 2015-01-01 Article PeerReviewed Hassan, Noordyana and Numata, Shinya and Hosaka, Tetsuro and Hashim, Mazlan (2015) Remote detection of flowering Somei Yoshino (Prunus x yedoensis) in an urban park using IKONOS imagery: comparison of hard and soft classifiers. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 9 (1). ISSN 1931-3195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.9.096046 DOI:10.1117/1.JRS.9.096046
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic G70.39-70.6 Remote sensing
spellingShingle G70.39-70.6 Remote sensing
Hassan, Noordyana
Numata, Shinya
Hosaka, Tetsuro
Hashim, Mazlan
Remote detection of flowering Somei Yoshino (Prunus x yedoensis) in an urban park using IKONOS imagery: comparison of hard and soft classifiers
description Identification of flowering trees in urban areas is challenging due to weak spectral signals and the high heterogeneity of urban landscapes. We hypothesized that a soft classifier, such as mixture tuned matched filtering (MTMF), would be better able to identify pixels including blooming cherry trees than a hard classifier such as maximum likelihood (ML). To test this hypothesis, we compared the accuracy of MTMF and ML in classifying blossoms of Somei Yoshino cherry trees (Prunus × yedoensis) in an urban park in Tokyo using IKONOS imagery. An accuracy assessment demonstrated that the MTMF classifier (overall accuracy: 62.2%, kappa coefficient: 0.507, and user's accuracy of SY: 48.1%) performed better than ML in identifying flowering SY (overall accuracy 48.7% with kappa accuracy: 0.321 and user's accuracy of blooming SY: 38.9%). Our results suggest that both methods are able to classify cherry blossoms in an urban landscape, but MTMF is more accurate than ML. However, the producer's accuracy of MTMF (72.7%) was slightly lower than ML (77.7%), suggesting that the accuracy of MTMF could decrease due to the limited number of available bands (four for IKONOS) and the existence of endmembers, such as dry grass in this study, with stronger signals than flowers.
format Article
author Hassan, Noordyana
Numata, Shinya
Hosaka, Tetsuro
Hashim, Mazlan
author_facet Hassan, Noordyana
Numata, Shinya
Hosaka, Tetsuro
Hashim, Mazlan
author_sort Hassan, Noordyana
title Remote detection of flowering Somei Yoshino (Prunus x yedoensis) in an urban park using IKONOS imagery: comparison of hard and soft classifiers
title_short Remote detection of flowering Somei Yoshino (Prunus x yedoensis) in an urban park using IKONOS imagery: comparison of hard and soft classifiers
title_full Remote detection of flowering Somei Yoshino (Prunus x yedoensis) in an urban park using IKONOS imagery: comparison of hard and soft classifiers
title_fullStr Remote detection of flowering Somei Yoshino (Prunus x yedoensis) in an urban park using IKONOS imagery: comparison of hard and soft classifiers
title_full_unstemmed Remote detection of flowering Somei Yoshino (Prunus x yedoensis) in an urban park using IKONOS imagery: comparison of hard and soft classifiers
title_sort remote detection of flowering somei yoshino (prunus x yedoensis) in an urban park using ikonos imagery: comparison of hard and soft classifiers
publisher SPIE
publishDate 2015
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/54870/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.9.096046
_version_ 1643653630698455040
score 13.160551