Evaluation of hyperthermia effect on cell viability using crystal violet staining, LDH and trypan blue assays

There is a variety of techniques for evaluating the viability of cultured mammalian cells. In this study, experimental results of fast cell viability assays were compared to reveal the most suitable method for determination of hyperthermia effect on viability of human breast cancer (MDA-MB 231) and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamdan, Salehhuddin, Elengoe, Asita
Format: Article
Published: American-Eurasian Network for Scientific Information 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/52762/
https://www.scopus.com
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.52762
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.527622018-06-30T00:45:05Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/52762/ Evaluation of hyperthermia effect on cell viability using crystal violet staining, LDH and trypan blue assays Hamdan, Salehhuddin Elengoe, Asita QH Natural history There is a variety of techniques for evaluating the viability of cultured mammalian cells. In this study, experimental results of fast cell viability assays were compared to reveal the most suitable method for determination of hyperthermia effect on viability of human breast cancer (MDA-MB 231) and normal liver (WRL-68) cell lines. The cells were exposed to heat at 42°C for 4 different duration of heat exposure (1, 2, 3 and 4 hours); and percentage of cell viability was determined using three different assays (trypan blue (TB), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and crystal violet, CV (1% glutaraldehyde or 4% paraformaldehye fixation)). Cell viability by the CV with 1% glutaraldehyde fixation method was not significantly different from those by CV with 4% paraformaldehyde. Crystal violet assay showed less viability of the treated cells meanwhile trypan blue indicated highest viability for both cell lines. Of the three counting techniques, the crystal violet assay gave consistently and significantly higher value than LDH (p<0.03) and trypan blue assay (p<0.05). This proved that crystal violet assay was the most sensitive assay whilst the least sensitive assay was trypan blue exclusion method. Therefore, crystal violet assay was more effective; simple; permits many samples to be analyzed rapidly and simultaneously when compared to LDH and trypan blue assays for MDA-MB 231 and WRL-68 cell lines. American-Eurasian Network for Scientific Information 2014 Article PeerReviewed Hamdan, Salehhuddin and Elengoe, Asita (2014) Evaluation of hyperthermia effect on cell viability using crystal violet staining, LDH and trypan blue assays. Advances in Environmental Biology, 8 (3). pp. 744-747. ISSN 1998-1066 https://www.scopus.com
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic QH Natural history
spellingShingle QH Natural history
Hamdan, Salehhuddin
Elengoe, Asita
Evaluation of hyperthermia effect on cell viability using crystal violet staining, LDH and trypan blue assays
description There is a variety of techniques for evaluating the viability of cultured mammalian cells. In this study, experimental results of fast cell viability assays were compared to reveal the most suitable method for determination of hyperthermia effect on viability of human breast cancer (MDA-MB 231) and normal liver (WRL-68) cell lines. The cells were exposed to heat at 42°C for 4 different duration of heat exposure (1, 2, 3 and 4 hours); and percentage of cell viability was determined using three different assays (trypan blue (TB), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and crystal violet, CV (1% glutaraldehyde or 4% paraformaldehye fixation)). Cell viability by the CV with 1% glutaraldehyde fixation method was not significantly different from those by CV with 4% paraformaldehyde. Crystal violet assay showed less viability of the treated cells meanwhile trypan blue indicated highest viability for both cell lines. Of the three counting techniques, the crystal violet assay gave consistently and significantly higher value than LDH (p<0.03) and trypan blue assay (p<0.05). This proved that crystal violet assay was the most sensitive assay whilst the least sensitive assay was trypan blue exclusion method. Therefore, crystal violet assay was more effective; simple; permits many samples to be analyzed rapidly and simultaneously when compared to LDH and trypan blue assays for MDA-MB 231 and WRL-68 cell lines.
format Article
author Hamdan, Salehhuddin
Elengoe, Asita
author_facet Hamdan, Salehhuddin
Elengoe, Asita
author_sort Hamdan, Salehhuddin
title Evaluation of hyperthermia effect on cell viability using crystal violet staining, LDH and trypan blue assays
title_short Evaluation of hyperthermia effect on cell viability using crystal violet staining, LDH and trypan blue assays
title_full Evaluation of hyperthermia effect on cell viability using crystal violet staining, LDH and trypan blue assays
title_fullStr Evaluation of hyperthermia effect on cell viability using crystal violet staining, LDH and trypan blue assays
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of hyperthermia effect on cell viability using crystal violet staining, LDH and trypan blue assays
title_sort evaluation of hyperthermia effect on cell viability using crystal violet staining, ldh and trypan blue assays
publisher American-Eurasian Network for Scientific Information
publishDate 2014
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/52762/
https://www.scopus.com
_version_ 1643653252470800384
score 13.160551