Comparison of clinical and textural approach for diabetic retinopathy grading
Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is an eye disease due to complication of diabetes. Early screening and treatment of DR disease is crucial to prevent blindness. This paper presents a comparison of different approaches for automated DR grading. In the current development of automated system for DR grading,...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/50952/ http://apps.webofknowledge.com.ezproxy.utm.my/full_record.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=4&SID=R2Cjh3fA6kIeWhVr585&page=1&doc=1 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.utm.50952 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utm.509522017-07-18T06:51:34Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/50952/ Comparison of clinical and textural approach for diabetic retinopathy grading Hashim, Mohd Fazli Mohd Hashim, Siti Zaiton QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is an eye disease due to complication of diabetes. Early screening and treatment of DR disease is crucial to prevent blindness. This paper presents a comparison of different approaches for automated DR grading. In the current development of automated system for DR grading, generally there are two approaches; clinical and textural. Clinical approach is based on the clinical study that refer to the abnormalities exist in retina such as microaneurysm, haemorhage, exudates and cotton wool spot. While textural approach is based on the visual or texture features of retina image. In this work we compare both approaches for performance analysis. Both approaches were applied to a standard dataset and the results show that both approaches capable to classify the severity of DR disease. This is based on the average classification accuracy obtained using support vector machine (SVM) with 82.74% and 83.87% for clinical and textural approach respectively. The pros and cons for each approach based on the experimental study also discussed in this paper. 2012 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed Hashim, Mohd Fazli and Mohd Hashim, Siti Zaiton (2012) Comparison of clinical and textural approach for diabetic retinopathy grading. In: 2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL SYSTEM, COMPUTING AND ENGINEERING (ICCSCE 2012), NOV 23-25, 2011, Penang, Malaysia. http://apps.webofknowledge.com.ezproxy.utm.my/full_record.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=4&SID=R2Cjh3fA6kIeWhVr585&page=1&doc=1 |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
building |
UTM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
content_source |
UTM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utm.my/ |
topic |
QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science |
spellingShingle |
QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science Hashim, Mohd Fazli Mohd Hashim, Siti Zaiton Comparison of clinical and textural approach for diabetic retinopathy grading |
description |
Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is an eye disease due to complication of diabetes. Early screening and treatment of DR disease is crucial to prevent blindness. This paper presents a comparison of different approaches for automated DR grading. In the current development of automated system for DR grading, generally there are two approaches; clinical and textural. Clinical approach is based on the clinical study that refer to the abnormalities exist in retina such as microaneurysm, haemorhage, exudates and cotton wool spot. While textural approach is based on the visual or texture features of retina image. In this work we compare both approaches for performance analysis. Both approaches were applied to a standard dataset and the results show that both approaches capable to classify the severity of DR disease. This is based on the average classification accuracy obtained using support vector machine (SVM) with 82.74% and 83.87% for clinical and textural approach respectively. The pros and cons for each approach based on the experimental study also discussed in this paper. |
format |
Conference or Workshop Item |
author |
Hashim, Mohd Fazli Mohd Hashim, Siti Zaiton |
author_facet |
Hashim, Mohd Fazli Mohd Hashim, Siti Zaiton |
author_sort |
Hashim, Mohd Fazli |
title |
Comparison of clinical and textural approach for diabetic retinopathy grading |
title_short |
Comparison of clinical and textural approach for diabetic retinopathy grading |
title_full |
Comparison of clinical and textural approach for diabetic retinopathy grading |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of clinical and textural approach for diabetic retinopathy grading |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of clinical and textural approach for diabetic retinopathy grading |
title_sort |
comparison of clinical and textural approach for diabetic retinopathy grading |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/50952/ http://apps.webofknowledge.com.ezproxy.utm.my/full_record.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=4&SID=R2Cjh3fA6kIeWhVr585&page=1&doc=1 |
_version_ |
1643652895100370944 |
score |
13.211869 |