Effects of process conditions in submerged ultra filtration for refinery wastewater treatment: optimization of operating process by response surface methodology

The influence of air bubble flow rate (ABFR), hydraulic retention time (HRT), mixed liquor suspended solid (MLSS) concentration, and pH on the performances of modified polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) was investigated in submerged membrane ultrafiltration (SMUF).The refinery wastewater process was con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erna Yuliwati, Erna Yuliwati, Ismail, Ahmad Fauzi, Lau, Woei Jye, Ng, Be Cheer, Mataram, A., Kassim, Mohd. Azraai
Format: Article
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/46898/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.051
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.46898
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.468982017-09-26T07:12:14Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/46898/ Effects of process conditions in submerged ultra filtration for refinery wastewater treatment: optimization of operating process by response surface methodology Erna Yuliwati, Erna Yuliwati Ismail, Ahmad Fauzi Lau, Woei Jye Ng, Be Cheer Mataram, A. Kassim, Mohd. Azraai TD Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering The influence of air bubble flow rate (ABFR), hydraulic retention time (HRT), mixed liquor suspended solid (MLSS) concentration, and pH on the performances of modified polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) was investigated in submerged membrane ultrafiltration (SMUF).The refinery wastewater process was conducted using an experimental set-up consisted of an SMUF reservoir, a circulation pump, and an aerator. For SMUF, operated at vacuum pressure, deposition and accumulation of suspended solids on membrane surface were prohibited with continuous aeration. The process performance was measured in terms of the membrane water flux and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency. The air bubbles flow rate was controlled at 1.2–3.0 mL/min while HRT was manipulated in the range of 120–300 min. MLSS and pH solution were controlled at 4.5 g/L and 6.5, respectively. Results from response surface methodology (RSM) have demonstrated the improvement in water flux and COD removal, achieving 145.7 L/m2 h and 90.8%, respectively. By using pH at 6.50, the optimized conditions achieved for refinery wastewater treatment were 2.25 mL/min, 276.93 min, 4.50 g/L for ABFR, HRT and MLSS concentration, respectively. 2012 Article PeerReviewed Erna Yuliwati, Erna Yuliwati and Ismail, Ahmad Fauzi and Lau, Woei Jye and Ng, Be Cheer and Mataram, A. and Kassim, Mohd. Azraai (2012) Effects of process conditions in submerged ultra filtration for refinery wastewater treatment: optimization of operating process by response surface methodology. Desalination, 28 . pp. 350-361. ISSN 0011-9164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.051
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic TD Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
spellingShingle TD Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
Erna Yuliwati, Erna Yuliwati
Ismail, Ahmad Fauzi
Lau, Woei Jye
Ng, Be Cheer
Mataram, A.
Kassim, Mohd. Azraai
Effects of process conditions in submerged ultra filtration for refinery wastewater treatment: optimization of operating process by response surface methodology
description The influence of air bubble flow rate (ABFR), hydraulic retention time (HRT), mixed liquor suspended solid (MLSS) concentration, and pH on the performances of modified polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) was investigated in submerged membrane ultrafiltration (SMUF).The refinery wastewater process was conducted using an experimental set-up consisted of an SMUF reservoir, a circulation pump, and an aerator. For SMUF, operated at vacuum pressure, deposition and accumulation of suspended solids on membrane surface were prohibited with continuous aeration. The process performance was measured in terms of the membrane water flux and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency. The air bubbles flow rate was controlled at 1.2–3.0 mL/min while HRT was manipulated in the range of 120–300 min. MLSS and pH solution were controlled at 4.5 g/L and 6.5, respectively. Results from response surface methodology (RSM) have demonstrated the improvement in water flux and COD removal, achieving 145.7 L/m2 h and 90.8%, respectively. By using pH at 6.50, the optimized conditions achieved for refinery wastewater treatment were 2.25 mL/min, 276.93 min, 4.50 g/L for ABFR, HRT and MLSS concentration, respectively.
format Article
author Erna Yuliwati, Erna Yuliwati
Ismail, Ahmad Fauzi
Lau, Woei Jye
Ng, Be Cheer
Mataram, A.
Kassim, Mohd. Azraai
author_facet Erna Yuliwati, Erna Yuliwati
Ismail, Ahmad Fauzi
Lau, Woei Jye
Ng, Be Cheer
Mataram, A.
Kassim, Mohd. Azraai
author_sort Erna Yuliwati, Erna Yuliwati
title Effects of process conditions in submerged ultra filtration for refinery wastewater treatment: optimization of operating process by response surface methodology
title_short Effects of process conditions in submerged ultra filtration for refinery wastewater treatment: optimization of operating process by response surface methodology
title_full Effects of process conditions in submerged ultra filtration for refinery wastewater treatment: optimization of operating process by response surface methodology
title_fullStr Effects of process conditions in submerged ultra filtration for refinery wastewater treatment: optimization of operating process by response surface methodology
title_full_unstemmed Effects of process conditions in submerged ultra filtration for refinery wastewater treatment: optimization of operating process by response surface methodology
title_sort effects of process conditions in submerged ultra filtration for refinery wastewater treatment: optimization of operating process by response surface methodology
publishDate 2012
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/46898/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.051
_version_ 1643652173542719488
score 13.159267