Evaluation usability measurement index for higher education institute

The Usability Measurement Index (UMI) for Higher Education websites is an instrument to measure the usability of higher education websites using the weightedpoint based system. It has been proposed to overcome the shortcomings of Webometrics, which merely rank HEI websites based on certain criteria...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ahmad, Muhammad Aliif
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/37030/5/MuhammadAliffAhmadMFSKSM2013.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/37030/
http://dms.library.utm.my:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:70089?site_name=Restricted Repository
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.37030
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.370302017-06-29T04:17:04Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/37030/ Evaluation usability measurement index for higher education institute Ahmad, Muhammad Aliif TK5015.888 Web sites The Usability Measurement Index (UMI) for Higher Education websites is an instrument to measure the usability of higher education websites using the weightedpoint based system. It has been proposed to overcome the shortcomings of Webometrics, which merely rank HEI websites based on certain criteria that are not related to usability. Testing of UMI has shown that it can be used to measure the usability of HEI websites. However, this is based on a small-scale study comprising of two HEI websites and 40 respondents. Thus, the aim of this research is to validate the instrument. In order to successfully validate it, ratings were given to each category and factors that had been previously proposed. Then total score were given based on both weights and ratings. Besides that, the Think-Aloud method had been applied as an appropriate add-on value to the UMI in order to increase its validity. In this research, two of the HEI websites from the Webometrics rank were used and an increased number of participants that is 60 participants were involved. The results were compared with their rank on the Webometrics ranking. The result showed that the gap between the two HEI websites were not as huge as shown in the Webometrics ranking. So, the rank of the Webometric is not the true reflection of the overall usability of the website itself. The UMI is considered validated because the instrument had been added an add-on value in Think-Aloud method and higher number of participants involved. 2013-08 Thesis NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/37030/5/MuhammadAliffAhmadMFSKSM2013.pdf Ahmad, Muhammad Aliif (2013) Evaluation usability measurement index for higher education institute. Masters thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Computing. http://dms.library.utm.my:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:70089?site_name=Restricted Repository
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
language English
topic TK5015.888 Web sites
spellingShingle TK5015.888 Web sites
Ahmad, Muhammad Aliif
Evaluation usability measurement index for higher education institute
description The Usability Measurement Index (UMI) for Higher Education websites is an instrument to measure the usability of higher education websites using the weightedpoint based system. It has been proposed to overcome the shortcomings of Webometrics, which merely rank HEI websites based on certain criteria that are not related to usability. Testing of UMI has shown that it can be used to measure the usability of HEI websites. However, this is based on a small-scale study comprising of two HEI websites and 40 respondents. Thus, the aim of this research is to validate the instrument. In order to successfully validate it, ratings were given to each category and factors that had been previously proposed. Then total score were given based on both weights and ratings. Besides that, the Think-Aloud method had been applied as an appropriate add-on value to the UMI in order to increase its validity. In this research, two of the HEI websites from the Webometrics rank were used and an increased number of participants that is 60 participants were involved. The results were compared with their rank on the Webometrics ranking. The result showed that the gap between the two HEI websites were not as huge as shown in the Webometrics ranking. So, the rank of the Webometric is not the true reflection of the overall usability of the website itself. The UMI is considered validated because the instrument had been added an add-on value in Think-Aloud method and higher number of participants involved.
format Thesis
author Ahmad, Muhammad Aliif
author_facet Ahmad, Muhammad Aliif
author_sort Ahmad, Muhammad Aliif
title Evaluation usability measurement index for higher education institute
title_short Evaluation usability measurement index for higher education institute
title_full Evaluation usability measurement index for higher education institute
title_fullStr Evaluation usability measurement index for higher education institute
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation usability measurement index for higher education institute
title_sort evaluation usability measurement index for higher education institute
publishDate 2013
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/37030/5/MuhammadAliffAhmadMFSKSM2013.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/37030/
http://dms.library.utm.my:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:70089?site_name=Restricted Repository
_version_ 1643650065687904256
score 13.2014675