Splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow

Flow analysis of backward-facing step is claimed to be a necessity when it comes to Computational Fluid Dynamics solver validation. The turbulence development with both separation and reattachment passing through the step has become the practical challenge for solver developers ever since the numeri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ngali, Zamani, Osman, Kahar, Johari, Nasrul Hadi
Format: Book Section
Published: American Institute of Physics 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/36027/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4704319
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.36027
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.360272017-02-04T05:53:13Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/36027/ Splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow Ngali, Zamani Osman, Kahar Johari, Nasrul Hadi TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery Flow analysis of backward-facing step is claimed to be a necessity when it comes to Computational Fluid Dynamics solver validation. The turbulence development with both separation and reattachment passing through the step has become the practical challenge for solver developers ever since the numerical computation revolution started. In-line with the trend, this work is predestined to further validate the use of Splitting velocity-pressure coupling method with immersed boundary extension for unsteady Navier-Stokes flow solver. The comparison is launched with steady numerical results via established software for commonly used benchmark backward-facing step construction. Flow parameters in both solvers are set equivalent to Reynolds number of 1000. The assessment is carried out when the flow has reached steady flow condition. The streamwise velocity profiles are well-matched where the maximum error is within 4%. The reattachment distance measured from the developed solver is also in good agreement with the reference results with only 1.84% difference recorded. The comparison proves that the solver developed in this work could become a very handy alternative especially when we look at the solver simplicity and the number of nodes it consumes to obtain comparable results. American Institute of Physics 2012 Book Section PeerReviewed Ngali, Zamani and Osman, Kahar and Johari, Nasrul Hadi (2012) Splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. American Institute of Physics, Maryland, USA, pp. 1040-1048. ISBN 978-073541032-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4704319 DOI:10.1063/1.4704319
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
spellingShingle TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
Ngali, Zamani
Osman, Kahar
Johari, Nasrul Hadi
Splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow
description Flow analysis of backward-facing step is claimed to be a necessity when it comes to Computational Fluid Dynamics solver validation. The turbulence development with both separation and reattachment passing through the step has become the practical challenge for solver developers ever since the numerical computation revolution started. In-line with the trend, this work is predestined to further validate the use of Splitting velocity-pressure coupling method with immersed boundary extension for unsteady Navier-Stokes flow solver. The comparison is launched with steady numerical results via established software for commonly used benchmark backward-facing step construction. Flow parameters in both solvers are set equivalent to Reynolds number of 1000. The assessment is carried out when the flow has reached steady flow condition. The streamwise velocity profiles are well-matched where the maximum error is within 4%. The reattachment distance measured from the developed solver is also in good agreement with the reference results with only 1.84% difference recorded. The comparison proves that the solver developed in this work could become a very handy alternative especially when we look at the solver simplicity and the number of nodes it consumes to obtain comparable results.
format Book Section
author Ngali, Zamani
Osman, Kahar
Johari, Nasrul Hadi
author_facet Ngali, Zamani
Osman, Kahar
Johari, Nasrul Hadi
author_sort Ngali, Zamani
title Splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow
title_short Splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow
title_full Splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow
title_fullStr Splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow
title_full_unstemmed Splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow
title_sort splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow
publisher American Institute of Physics
publishDate 2012
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/36027/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4704319
_version_ 1643649882577174528
score 13.160551