Common faults made by arbitrators in the execution of their duties

Apart from litigation, arbitration which is governed under Arbitration Act 2005 has becoming very popular and sought by many on resolving the disputes. In fact, the current lifestyle and constraints limited the people to be able to wait longer period to come to a conclusion by way of litigation. Thi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ishak, Fauziah
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/33870/5/FauziahIshakMFAB2010.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/33870/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.33870
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.338702017-09-20T07:48:09Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/33870/ Common faults made by arbitrators in the execution of their duties Ishak, Fauziah K Law (General) Apart from litigation, arbitration which is governed under Arbitration Act 2005 has becoming very popular and sought by many on resolving the disputes. In fact, the current lifestyle and constraints limited the people to be able to wait longer period to come to a conclusion by way of litigation. This is because litigation has its own formality and procedural for the judgment to be held. It also takes more time for the judges to arrive to a final decision. In tackling and preside the dispute, an arbitrator must be equipped with certain qualifications. An arbitrator must be a professional, skillful and is presumed to have knowledge on the contracting, technicality and arbitration rules and guidelines. Not only that, an arbitrator must ensure that the award is not challenged by the unsatisfied parties. This is done by way of making sure that the award is cogent, certain, complete, just and enforceable. It is a fact however; there are cases on which an award is not accepted by the parties eventhough the common understandings by the parties are to end the existing dispute in the first place. Again, there are several factors that led to this objection which covers arbitrator lack of knowledge, impartial, independent, fraud, bias and not taking into consideration all evidence that is raised. The objective of this research is to determine the values of arbitrator as professional on resolving the issues and conflict. From the analysis and review of cases, it is found that the courts had given its opinion and interpretation with regards to the cases forwarded to them by the dispute parties on arbitrator decision. The professionalism of an arbitrator though is questionable is in reality just meeting the standard of work performance and not exceeding the limit or beyond the expectation. 2010-07-02 Thesis NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/33870/5/FauziahIshakMFAB2010.pdf Ishak, Fauziah (2010) Common faults made by arbitrators in the execution of their duties. Masters thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Built Environment.
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
language English
topic K Law (General)
spellingShingle K Law (General)
Ishak, Fauziah
Common faults made by arbitrators in the execution of their duties
description Apart from litigation, arbitration which is governed under Arbitration Act 2005 has becoming very popular and sought by many on resolving the disputes. In fact, the current lifestyle and constraints limited the people to be able to wait longer period to come to a conclusion by way of litigation. This is because litigation has its own formality and procedural for the judgment to be held. It also takes more time for the judges to arrive to a final decision. In tackling and preside the dispute, an arbitrator must be equipped with certain qualifications. An arbitrator must be a professional, skillful and is presumed to have knowledge on the contracting, technicality and arbitration rules and guidelines. Not only that, an arbitrator must ensure that the award is not challenged by the unsatisfied parties. This is done by way of making sure that the award is cogent, certain, complete, just and enforceable. It is a fact however; there are cases on which an award is not accepted by the parties eventhough the common understandings by the parties are to end the existing dispute in the first place. Again, there are several factors that led to this objection which covers arbitrator lack of knowledge, impartial, independent, fraud, bias and not taking into consideration all evidence that is raised. The objective of this research is to determine the values of arbitrator as professional on resolving the issues and conflict. From the analysis and review of cases, it is found that the courts had given its opinion and interpretation with regards to the cases forwarded to them by the dispute parties on arbitrator decision. The professionalism of an arbitrator though is questionable is in reality just meeting the standard of work performance and not exceeding the limit or beyond the expectation.
format Thesis
author Ishak, Fauziah
author_facet Ishak, Fauziah
author_sort Ishak, Fauziah
title Common faults made by arbitrators in the execution of their duties
title_short Common faults made by arbitrators in the execution of their duties
title_full Common faults made by arbitrators in the execution of their duties
title_fullStr Common faults made by arbitrators in the execution of their duties
title_full_unstemmed Common faults made by arbitrators in the execution of their duties
title_sort common faults made by arbitrators in the execution of their duties
publishDate 2010
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/33870/5/FauziahIshakMFAB2010.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/33870/
_version_ 1643649455413526528
score 13.160551