Fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification

Principle Component Analysis (PCA) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) are two well-known methods that are used for face verification and recognition systems. Both of these methods perform dimensionality reduction. In similarity based face verification approach, a function known as similarity fun...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arfa, Reza, Yusof, Rubiyah, Awang, Suryanti
Format: Article
Published: ICIC Express Letters Office 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/30484/
https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84857956597&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.30484
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.304842022-01-31T08:41:47Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/30484/ Fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification Arfa, Reza Yusof, Rubiyah Awang, Suryanti TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering Principle Component Analysis (PCA) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) are two well-known methods that are used for face verification and recognition systems. Both of these methods perform dimensionality reduction. In similarity based face verification approach, a function known as similarity function assigns a matching score to a new given face image and its claimed identity, by measuring the distance between the face image and its stored template. In this work new data are first projected into both Eigenspace and Fisher space and matching-score is obtained for each space separately. The information from these two score is combined together with three different fusion rules, i.e., sum, max, and mean rule. Two different face databases, ORL and YALE, are used to evaluate the verification accuracy based on Equal Error Rate (EER). The EER for ORL database by using fusion approach is 7.12%-7.22% compared with the PCA of 7.6% and the LDA of 7.87%. The same experiment for Yale database shows by fusing the classifiers the error is 14.22% to 15.20% while by only using PCA the error is 15.27% and the error for LDA is 15.5%. Thus, fusing Eigenface and Fisherface system outperforms using them individually. ICIC Express Letters Office 2012-04 Article PeerReviewed Arfa, Reza and Yusof, Rubiyah and Awang, Suryanti (2012) Fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification. ICIC Express Letters, 6 (4). pp. 857-862. ISSN 1881-803X https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84857956597&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
spellingShingle TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
Arfa, Reza
Yusof, Rubiyah
Awang, Suryanti
Fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification
description Principle Component Analysis (PCA) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) are two well-known methods that are used for face verification and recognition systems. Both of these methods perform dimensionality reduction. In similarity based face verification approach, a function known as similarity function assigns a matching score to a new given face image and its claimed identity, by measuring the distance between the face image and its stored template. In this work new data are first projected into both Eigenspace and Fisher space and matching-score is obtained for each space separately. The information from these two score is combined together with three different fusion rules, i.e., sum, max, and mean rule. Two different face databases, ORL and YALE, are used to evaluate the verification accuracy based on Equal Error Rate (EER). The EER for ORL database by using fusion approach is 7.12%-7.22% compared with the PCA of 7.6% and the LDA of 7.87%. The same experiment for Yale database shows by fusing the classifiers the error is 14.22% to 15.20% while by only using PCA the error is 15.27% and the error for LDA is 15.5%. Thus, fusing Eigenface and Fisherface system outperforms using them individually.
format Article
author Arfa, Reza
Yusof, Rubiyah
Awang, Suryanti
author_facet Arfa, Reza
Yusof, Rubiyah
Awang, Suryanti
author_sort Arfa, Reza
title Fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification
title_short Fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification
title_full Fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification
title_fullStr Fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification
title_full_unstemmed Fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification
title_sort fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification
publisher ICIC Express Letters Office
publishDate 2012
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/30484/
https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84857956597&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1
_version_ 1724073268070055936
score 13.160551