Evaluation of FCV and FCM clustering algorithms in cluster-based compound selection

In the last few years, a number of available screening compounds has been growing rapidly due to the recent developments of high-throughput screening in drug discovery. Chemical vendors provide millions of compounds for drug lead identification; however, these compounds are highly redundant. Cluster...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suhaili, S. M., Jambli, M. N., Huspi, Sharin Hazlin
Format: Book Section
Published: IEEE Explorer 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/29657/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CITA.2011.5999519
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.29657
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.296572017-02-05T00:04:41Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/29657/ Evaluation of FCV and FCM clustering algorithms in cluster-based compound selection Suhaili, S. M. Jambli, M. N. Huspi, Sharin Hazlin QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science In the last few years, a number of available screening compounds has been growing rapidly due to the recent developments of high-throughput screening in drug discovery. Chemical vendors provide millions of compounds for drug lead identification; however, these compounds are highly redundant. Clustering method that groups similar compounds into families, can be used to analyze such redundancy. One of most used clustering method is cluster-based compound selection, which involves subdividing a set of compounds into clusters and choosing one compound or a small number of compounds from each cluster. However, little research has been done on overlapping method fuzzy c-means (FCM) and fuzzy c-varieties (FCV) clustering algorithms in compound selection research. Therefore, these two clustering algorithms are implemented and the performance is analyzed based on the effectiveness of the clustering results in terms of mean intercluster molecular dissimilarity (MIMDS) where these results are compared with one another. The analysis shows that in terms of MIMDS, the FCV is better than FCM because it clearly shown the uniform results compare to FCM clustering algorithm. IEEE Explorer 2011 Book Section PeerReviewed Suhaili, S. M. and Jambli, M. N. and Huspi, Sharin Hazlin (2011) Evaluation of FCV and FCM clustering algorithms in cluster-based compound selection. In: 2011 7th International Conference on Information Technology in Asia: Emerging Convergences and Singularity of Forms - Proceedings of CITA'11. IEEE Explorer, USA, 001-005. ISBN 978-161284130-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CITA.2011.5999519 10.1109/CITA.2011.5999519
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
spellingShingle QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Suhaili, S. M.
Jambli, M. N.
Huspi, Sharin Hazlin
Evaluation of FCV and FCM clustering algorithms in cluster-based compound selection
description In the last few years, a number of available screening compounds has been growing rapidly due to the recent developments of high-throughput screening in drug discovery. Chemical vendors provide millions of compounds for drug lead identification; however, these compounds are highly redundant. Clustering method that groups similar compounds into families, can be used to analyze such redundancy. One of most used clustering method is cluster-based compound selection, which involves subdividing a set of compounds into clusters and choosing one compound or a small number of compounds from each cluster. However, little research has been done on overlapping method fuzzy c-means (FCM) and fuzzy c-varieties (FCV) clustering algorithms in compound selection research. Therefore, these two clustering algorithms are implemented and the performance is analyzed based on the effectiveness of the clustering results in terms of mean intercluster molecular dissimilarity (MIMDS) where these results are compared with one another. The analysis shows that in terms of MIMDS, the FCV is better than FCM because it clearly shown the uniform results compare to FCM clustering algorithm.
format Book Section
author Suhaili, S. M.
Jambli, M. N.
Huspi, Sharin Hazlin
author_facet Suhaili, S. M.
Jambli, M. N.
Huspi, Sharin Hazlin
author_sort Suhaili, S. M.
title Evaluation of FCV and FCM clustering algorithms in cluster-based compound selection
title_short Evaluation of FCV and FCM clustering algorithms in cluster-based compound selection
title_full Evaluation of FCV and FCM clustering algorithms in cluster-based compound selection
title_fullStr Evaluation of FCV and FCM clustering algorithms in cluster-based compound selection
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of FCV and FCM clustering algorithms in cluster-based compound selection
title_sort evaluation of fcv and fcm clustering algorithms in cluster-based compound selection
publisher IEEE Explorer
publishDate 2011
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/29657/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CITA.2011.5999519
_version_ 1643648347680014336
score 13.18916