Using BWW model to evaluate building ontologies in CGs formalism
The Bunge-Wand-Weber (BWW) representation model defines ontological constructs for information systems. According to these constructs the completeness and efficiency of a modeling technique can be defined. Ontology plays an essential role in e-commerce. Using or updating an existing ontology and pro...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2005
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/12408/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2004.03.002 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The Bunge-Wand-Weber (BWW) representation model defines ontological constructs for information systems. According to these constructs the completeness and efficiency of a modeling technique can be defined. Ontology plays an essential role in e-commerce. Using or updating an existing ontology and providing tools to solve any semantic conflicts become essential steps before putting a system online. We use conceptual graphs (CGs) to implement ontologies. This paper evaluates CG capabilities using the BWW representation model. It finds out that CGs are ontologically complete according to Wand and Weber definition. Also it finds out that CGs have construct overload and construct redundancy which can undermine the ontological clarity of CGs. This leads us to build a meta-model to avoid some ontological-unclarity problems. We use some of the BWW constructs to build the meta-model. |
|---|