3D display for 3D telepresence: A review
Over the years, people have tried to advance 3D display technology and researchers as well as developers have created different innovations in recent decades. there are many other different types of 3D display technology that can be classified into stereoscopic, auto stereoscopic, holographic and vo...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Penerbit UTM Press
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/108817/1/AjuneWanisIsmail2022_3DDisplayfor3DTelepresenceAreview.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/108817/ http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/ijic.v12n1.318 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.utm.108817 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utm.1088172024-12-09T07:31:35Z http://eprints.utm.my/108817/ 3D display for 3D telepresence: A review Fadzli, Fazliaty Edora Nor’a, Muhammad Nur Affendy Ismail, Ajune Wanis QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science Over the years, people have tried to advance 3D display technology and researchers as well as developers have created different innovations in recent decades. there are many other different types of 3D display technology that can be classified into stereoscopic, auto stereoscopic, holographic and volumetric 3D displays. This paper, however, discusses the 3D display technology that have been implemented in the telepresence system, which can be divided into two main devices, projectors and head mounted display (HMD). From these two devices, the 3D display technology using projector devices are on-stage hologram, auto stereoscopic display, and holographic projection; while for HMD can be divided into MR headset and VR HMD. This paper provides a review on these 3D display for telepresence. Finally, we make a comparison based on the features of the 3D display technologies such as life-size capability, viewable from different perspectives, headset-free experience number of viewers per device, level of ease of setup and the nausea of discomfort level. To choose the best 3D display technology for a telepresence system, we must first identify the number of users who will be projected and who will be viewed. The goal and activity of using telepresence technology will also define the appropriate type of 3D display. Penerbit UTM Press 2022 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/108817/1/AjuneWanisIsmail2022_3DDisplayfor3DTelepresenceAreview.pdf Fadzli, Fazliaty Edora and Nor’a, Muhammad Nur Affendy and Ismail, Ajune Wanis (2022) 3D display for 3D telepresence: A review. International Journal of Innovative Computing, 12 (1). pp. 1-7. ISSN 2180-4370 http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/ijic.v12n1.318 DOI : 10.11113/ijic.v12n1.318 |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
building |
UTM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
content_source |
UTM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utm.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science |
spellingShingle |
QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science Fadzli, Fazliaty Edora Nor’a, Muhammad Nur Affendy Ismail, Ajune Wanis 3D display for 3D telepresence: A review |
description |
Over the years, people have tried to advance 3D display technology and researchers as well as developers have created different innovations in recent decades. there are many other different types of 3D display technology that can be classified into stereoscopic, auto stereoscopic, holographic and volumetric 3D displays. This paper, however, discusses the 3D display technology that have been implemented in the telepresence system, which can be divided into two main devices, projectors and head mounted display (HMD). From these two devices, the 3D display technology using projector devices are on-stage hologram, auto stereoscopic display, and holographic projection; while for HMD can be divided into MR headset and VR HMD. This paper provides a review on these 3D display for telepresence. Finally, we make a comparison based on the features of the 3D display technologies such as life-size capability, viewable from different perspectives, headset-free experience number of viewers per device, level of ease of setup and the nausea of discomfort level. To choose the best 3D display technology for a telepresence system, we must first identify the number of users who will be projected and who will be viewed. The goal and activity of using telepresence technology will also define the appropriate type of 3D display. |
format |
Article |
author |
Fadzli, Fazliaty Edora Nor’a, Muhammad Nur Affendy Ismail, Ajune Wanis |
author_facet |
Fadzli, Fazliaty Edora Nor’a, Muhammad Nur Affendy Ismail, Ajune Wanis |
author_sort |
Fadzli, Fazliaty Edora |
title |
3D display for 3D telepresence: A review |
title_short |
3D display for 3D telepresence: A review |
title_full |
3D display for 3D telepresence: A review |
title_fullStr |
3D display for 3D telepresence: A review |
title_full_unstemmed |
3D display for 3D telepresence: A review |
title_sort |
3d display for 3d telepresence: a review |
publisher |
Penerbit UTM Press |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
http://eprints.utm.my/108817/1/AjuneWanisIsmail2022_3DDisplayfor3DTelepresenceAreview.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/108817/ http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/ijic.v12n1.318 |
_version_ |
1818834053255659520 |
score |
13.222552 |