3D display for 3D telepresence: A review

Over the years, people have tried to advance 3D display technology and researchers as well as developers have created different innovations in recent decades. there are many other different types of 3D display technology that can be classified into stereoscopic, auto stereoscopic, holographic and vo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fadzli, Fazliaty Edora, Nor’a, Muhammad Nur Affendy, Ismail, Ajune Wanis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit UTM Press 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/108817/1/AjuneWanisIsmail2022_3DDisplayfor3DTelepresenceAreview.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/108817/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/ijic.v12n1.318
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.108817
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.1088172024-12-09T07:31:35Z http://eprints.utm.my/108817/ 3D display for 3D telepresence: A review Fadzli, Fazliaty Edora Nor’a, Muhammad Nur Affendy Ismail, Ajune Wanis QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science Over the years, people have tried to advance 3D display technology and researchers as well as developers have created different innovations in recent decades. there are many other different types of 3D display technology that can be classified into stereoscopic, auto stereoscopic, holographic and volumetric 3D displays. This paper, however, discusses the 3D display technology that have been implemented in the telepresence system, which can be divided into two main devices, projectors and head mounted display (HMD). From these two devices, the 3D display technology using projector devices are on-stage hologram, auto stereoscopic display, and holographic projection; while for HMD can be divided into MR headset and VR HMD. This paper provides a review on these 3D display for telepresence. Finally, we make a comparison based on the features of the 3D display technologies such as life-size capability, viewable from different perspectives, headset-free experience number of viewers per device, level of ease of setup and the nausea of discomfort level. To choose the best 3D display technology for a telepresence system, we must first identify the number of users who will be projected and who will be viewed. The goal and activity of using telepresence technology will also define the appropriate type of 3D display. Penerbit UTM Press 2022 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/108817/1/AjuneWanisIsmail2022_3DDisplayfor3DTelepresenceAreview.pdf Fadzli, Fazliaty Edora and Nor’a, Muhammad Nur Affendy and Ismail, Ajune Wanis (2022) 3D display for 3D telepresence: A review. International Journal of Innovative Computing, 12 (1). pp. 1-7. ISSN 2180-4370 http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/ijic.v12n1.318 DOI : 10.11113/ijic.v12n1.318
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
language English
topic QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
spellingShingle QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Fadzli, Fazliaty Edora
Nor’a, Muhammad Nur Affendy
Ismail, Ajune Wanis
3D display for 3D telepresence: A review
description Over the years, people have tried to advance 3D display technology and researchers as well as developers have created different innovations in recent decades. there are many other different types of 3D display technology that can be classified into stereoscopic, auto stereoscopic, holographic and volumetric 3D displays. This paper, however, discusses the 3D display technology that have been implemented in the telepresence system, which can be divided into two main devices, projectors and head mounted display (HMD). From these two devices, the 3D display technology using projector devices are on-stage hologram, auto stereoscopic display, and holographic projection; while for HMD can be divided into MR headset and VR HMD. This paper provides a review on these 3D display for telepresence. Finally, we make a comparison based on the features of the 3D display technologies such as life-size capability, viewable from different perspectives, headset-free experience number of viewers per device, level of ease of setup and the nausea of discomfort level. To choose the best 3D display technology for a telepresence system, we must first identify the number of users who will be projected and who will be viewed. The goal and activity of using telepresence technology will also define the appropriate type of 3D display.
format Article
author Fadzli, Fazliaty Edora
Nor’a, Muhammad Nur Affendy
Ismail, Ajune Wanis
author_facet Fadzli, Fazliaty Edora
Nor’a, Muhammad Nur Affendy
Ismail, Ajune Wanis
author_sort Fadzli, Fazliaty Edora
title 3D display for 3D telepresence: A review
title_short 3D display for 3D telepresence: A review
title_full 3D display for 3D telepresence: A review
title_fullStr 3D display for 3D telepresence: A review
title_full_unstemmed 3D display for 3D telepresence: A review
title_sort 3d display for 3d telepresence: a review
publisher Penerbit UTM Press
publishDate 2022
url http://eprints.utm.my/108817/1/AjuneWanisIsmail2022_3DDisplayfor3DTelepresenceAreview.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/108817/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/ijic.v12n1.318
_version_ 1818834053255659520
score 13.222552