A comparison of two deep learning models on the stock exchange predictions.

In this study, we introduce the deep learning approach for the time series forecasting model, particularly for the stock price prediction, using two popular deep learning methods: the long short-term memory (LSTM) networks and the gated recurrent unit (GRU) networks. The data are collected from comp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Herwindiati, Dyah E., Hendryli, Janson, Sarmin, Nor Haniza
Format: Article
Published: Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/105453/
http://www.i-csrs.org/Volumes/ijasca/IJASCA.230720.15.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.105453
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.1054532024-04-28T09:26:54Z http://eprints.utm.my/105453/ A comparison of two deep learning models on the stock exchange predictions. Herwindiati, Dyah E. Hendryli, Janson Sarmin, Nor Haniza L Education (General) LB Theory and practice of education In this study, we introduce the deep learning approach for the time series forecasting model, particularly for the stock price prediction, using two popular deep learning methods: the long short-term memory (LSTM) networks and the gated recurrent unit (GRU) networks. The data are collected from companies in the LQ45 index of the Indonesian Stock Exchange and the deep learning models are implemented using the Python programming language and the TensorFlow library. The results are evaluated using root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and coefficient of determination or R2. From the experiment, we demonstrate that the LSTM model achieves RMSE 0.005844, MAPE 0.01427, R2 0.99898, and the GRU model achieves RMSE 0.005601, MAPE 0.001594, R2 0.99907 in the training and validation phase where we utilize data up to Dec 31st, 2022. Furthermore, we test the model using unseen data from PT Adaro Energy Indonesia Tbk and find the GRU model achieves better performance with R2 0.66885 compared to the LSTM with R2 0.38756. From the experiment, we find that the deep learning approach can be considered a good forecasting model. Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan 2023 Article PeerReviewed Herwindiati, Dyah E. and Hendryli, Janson and Sarmin, Nor Haniza (2023) A comparison of two deep learning models on the stock exchange predictions. International Journal Of Advances In Soft Computing And Its Applications, 15 (2). pp. 225-234. ISSN 2074-8523 http://www.i-csrs.org/Volumes/ijasca/IJASCA.230720.15.pdf NA
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic L Education (General)
LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle L Education (General)
LB Theory and practice of education
Herwindiati, Dyah E.
Hendryli, Janson
Sarmin, Nor Haniza
A comparison of two deep learning models on the stock exchange predictions.
description In this study, we introduce the deep learning approach for the time series forecasting model, particularly for the stock price prediction, using two popular deep learning methods: the long short-term memory (LSTM) networks and the gated recurrent unit (GRU) networks. The data are collected from companies in the LQ45 index of the Indonesian Stock Exchange and the deep learning models are implemented using the Python programming language and the TensorFlow library. The results are evaluated using root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and coefficient of determination or R2. From the experiment, we demonstrate that the LSTM model achieves RMSE 0.005844, MAPE 0.01427, R2 0.99898, and the GRU model achieves RMSE 0.005601, MAPE 0.001594, R2 0.99907 in the training and validation phase where we utilize data up to Dec 31st, 2022. Furthermore, we test the model using unseen data from PT Adaro Energy Indonesia Tbk and find the GRU model achieves better performance with R2 0.66885 compared to the LSTM with R2 0.38756. From the experiment, we find that the deep learning approach can be considered a good forecasting model.
format Article
author Herwindiati, Dyah E.
Hendryli, Janson
Sarmin, Nor Haniza
author_facet Herwindiati, Dyah E.
Hendryli, Janson
Sarmin, Nor Haniza
author_sort Herwindiati, Dyah E.
title A comparison of two deep learning models on the stock exchange predictions.
title_short A comparison of two deep learning models on the stock exchange predictions.
title_full A comparison of two deep learning models on the stock exchange predictions.
title_fullStr A comparison of two deep learning models on the stock exchange predictions.
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of two deep learning models on the stock exchange predictions.
title_sort comparison of two deep learning models on the stock exchange predictions.
publisher Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan
publishDate 2023
url http://eprints.utm.my/105453/
http://www.i-csrs.org/Volumes/ijasca/IJASCA.230720.15.pdf
_version_ 1797906028647415808
score 13.214268