Optimum sizing of components for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking buck converter

A photovoltaic (PV) maximum power point tracking (MPPT) converter consists of MPPT algorithm and converter. Although there has been a lot of improvement for MPPT algorithm, there is still much to improve for the converter. This paper proposed optimum sizing for the ideal PV MPPT buck converter with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ayop, Razman, Zaki, Muhammad Fariz Izzwan, Tan, Chee Wei, Md. Ayob, Shahrin, Abdul Aziz, Mohd. Junaidi
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/104130/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.07.032
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.104130
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.1041302024-01-17T01:24:44Z http://eprints.utm.my/104130/ Optimum sizing of components for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking buck converter Ayop, Razman Zaki, Muhammad Fariz Izzwan Tan, Chee Wei Md. Ayob, Shahrin Abdul Aziz, Mohd. Junaidi TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering A photovoltaic (PV) maximum power point tracking (MPPT) converter consists of MPPT algorithm and converter. Although there has been a lot of improvement for MPPT algorithm, there is still much to improve for the converter. This paper proposed optimum sizing for the ideal PV MPPT buck converter with resistive and battery loads. The optimum sizing ensures the MPPT converter operates in the continuous current mode (CCM) operation and within the defined output voltage ripple for the specified range of irradiance. These conditions are achieved by deriving the equations of the inductances and capacitances required for the MPPT buck converter. The CCM operation is designed to be closed to the DCM to ensure a small inductance value. The specified output voltage ripple ensures the quality of the output of the MPPT buck converter. The verification of the derivation is done using MATLAB/Simulink circuit simulation. The conventional single diode PV model and perturb and observe (PnO) MPPT is used in the system. The result shows that the range of output resistance is highly affecting the duty cycle range, which leads to MPPT failure if the output resistance is not calculated properly. The converters for both resistive and battery loads can operate in the CCM and close to the DCM operation based on the proposed design. These converters also maintain output voltage ripple factor at 1% or lower, which the proposed derivation follows the specification. In conclusion, the proposed derivation of the MPPT buck converter is accurate. Elsevier Ltd 2022-09-01 Article PeerReviewed Ayop, Razman and Zaki, Muhammad Fariz Izzwan and Tan, Chee Wei and Md. Ayob, Shahrin and Abdul Aziz, Mohd. Junaidi (2022) Optimum sizing of components for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking buck converter. Solar Energy, 243 (NA). pp. 236-246. ISSN 0038-092X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.07.032 DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2022.07.032
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
spellingShingle TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
Ayop, Razman
Zaki, Muhammad Fariz Izzwan
Tan, Chee Wei
Md. Ayob, Shahrin
Abdul Aziz, Mohd. Junaidi
Optimum sizing of components for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking buck converter
description A photovoltaic (PV) maximum power point tracking (MPPT) converter consists of MPPT algorithm and converter. Although there has been a lot of improvement for MPPT algorithm, there is still much to improve for the converter. This paper proposed optimum sizing for the ideal PV MPPT buck converter with resistive and battery loads. The optimum sizing ensures the MPPT converter operates in the continuous current mode (CCM) operation and within the defined output voltage ripple for the specified range of irradiance. These conditions are achieved by deriving the equations of the inductances and capacitances required for the MPPT buck converter. The CCM operation is designed to be closed to the DCM to ensure a small inductance value. The specified output voltage ripple ensures the quality of the output of the MPPT buck converter. The verification of the derivation is done using MATLAB/Simulink circuit simulation. The conventional single diode PV model and perturb and observe (PnO) MPPT is used in the system. The result shows that the range of output resistance is highly affecting the duty cycle range, which leads to MPPT failure if the output resistance is not calculated properly. The converters for both resistive and battery loads can operate in the CCM and close to the DCM operation based on the proposed design. These converters also maintain output voltage ripple factor at 1% or lower, which the proposed derivation follows the specification. In conclusion, the proposed derivation of the MPPT buck converter is accurate.
format Article
author Ayop, Razman
Zaki, Muhammad Fariz Izzwan
Tan, Chee Wei
Md. Ayob, Shahrin
Abdul Aziz, Mohd. Junaidi
author_facet Ayop, Razman
Zaki, Muhammad Fariz Izzwan
Tan, Chee Wei
Md. Ayob, Shahrin
Abdul Aziz, Mohd. Junaidi
author_sort Ayop, Razman
title Optimum sizing of components for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking buck converter
title_short Optimum sizing of components for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking buck converter
title_full Optimum sizing of components for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking buck converter
title_fullStr Optimum sizing of components for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking buck converter
title_full_unstemmed Optimum sizing of components for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking buck converter
title_sort optimum sizing of components for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking buck converter
publisher Elsevier Ltd
publishDate 2022
url http://eprints.utm.my/104130/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.07.032
_version_ 1789424383469551616
score 13.211869