Dorsal Hand Vein Pattern Recognition: A Comparison between Manual and Automatic Segmentation Methods

Various techniques for dorsal hand vein (DHV) pattern extraction have been introduced using small datasets with poor and inconsistent segmentation. This work compared manual segmentation with our proposed hybrid automatic segmentation method (HHM) for this classification problem. Methods: Manual se...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Waheed Ali Laghari, Waheed Ali Laghari, Audrey Huong, Kim Gaik Tay, Audrey Huong, Kim Gaik Tay, Chang Choon Chew, Chang Choon Chew
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: HIR 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/9253/1/J16048_96765c3676a37ea9fa555805a2d79d35.pdf
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/9253/
https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2023.29.2.152
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uthm.eprints.9253
record_format eprints
spelling my.uthm.eprints.92532023-07-17T07:46:13Z http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/9253/ Dorsal Hand Vein Pattern Recognition: A Comparison between Manual and Automatic Segmentation Methods Waheed Ali Laghari, Waheed Ali Laghari Audrey Huong, Kim Gaik Tay, Audrey Huong, Kim Gaik Tay Chang Choon Chew, Chang Choon Chew T Technology (General) Various techniques for dorsal hand vein (DHV) pattern extraction have been introduced using small datasets with poor and inconsistent segmentation. This work compared manual segmentation with our proposed hybrid automatic segmentation method (HHM) for this classification problem. Methods: Manual segmentation involved selecting a region-ofinterest (ROI) in images from the Bosphorus dataset to generate ground truth data. The HHM combined histogram equalization and morphological and thresholding-based algorithms to localize veins from hand images. The data were divided into training, validation, and testing sets with an 8:1:1 ratio before training AlexNet. We considered three image augmentation strategies to enlarge our training sets. The best training hyperparameters were found using the manually segmented dataset. Results: We obtained a good test accuracy (91.5%) using the model trained with manually segmented images. The HHM method showed slightly inferior performance (76.5%). Considerable improvement was observed in the test accuracy of the model trained with the inclusion of automatically segmented and augmented images (84%), with low false acceptance and false rejection rates (0.00035% and 0.095%, respectively). A comparison with past studies further demonstrated the competitiveness of our technique. Conclusions: Our technique can be feasible for extracting the ROI in DHV images. This strategy provides higher consistency and greater efficiency than the manual approach. HIR 2023 Article PeerReviewed text en http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/9253/1/J16048_96765c3676a37ea9fa555805a2d79d35.pdf Waheed Ali Laghari, Waheed Ali Laghari and Audrey Huong, Kim Gaik Tay, Audrey Huong, Kim Gaik Tay and Chang Choon Chew, Chang Choon Chew (2023) Dorsal Hand Vein Pattern Recognition: A Comparison between Manual and Automatic Segmentation Methods. Healthc Inform Res, 29 (2). pp. 152-160. ISSN 2093-3681 https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2023.29.2.152
institution Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
building UTHM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
content_source UTHM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/
language English
topic T Technology (General)
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
Waheed Ali Laghari, Waheed Ali Laghari
Audrey Huong, Kim Gaik Tay, Audrey Huong, Kim Gaik Tay
Chang Choon Chew, Chang Choon Chew
Dorsal Hand Vein Pattern Recognition: A Comparison between Manual and Automatic Segmentation Methods
description Various techniques for dorsal hand vein (DHV) pattern extraction have been introduced using small datasets with poor and inconsistent segmentation. This work compared manual segmentation with our proposed hybrid automatic segmentation method (HHM) for this classification problem. Methods: Manual segmentation involved selecting a region-ofinterest (ROI) in images from the Bosphorus dataset to generate ground truth data. The HHM combined histogram equalization and morphological and thresholding-based algorithms to localize veins from hand images. The data were divided into training, validation, and testing sets with an 8:1:1 ratio before training AlexNet. We considered three image augmentation strategies to enlarge our training sets. The best training hyperparameters were found using the manually segmented dataset. Results: We obtained a good test accuracy (91.5%) using the model trained with manually segmented images. The HHM method showed slightly inferior performance (76.5%). Considerable improvement was observed in the test accuracy of the model trained with the inclusion of automatically segmented and augmented images (84%), with low false acceptance and false rejection rates (0.00035% and 0.095%, respectively). A comparison with past studies further demonstrated the competitiveness of our technique. Conclusions: Our technique can be feasible for extracting the ROI in DHV images. This strategy provides higher consistency and greater efficiency than the manual approach.
format Article
author Waheed Ali Laghari, Waheed Ali Laghari
Audrey Huong, Kim Gaik Tay, Audrey Huong, Kim Gaik Tay
Chang Choon Chew, Chang Choon Chew
author_facet Waheed Ali Laghari, Waheed Ali Laghari
Audrey Huong, Kim Gaik Tay, Audrey Huong, Kim Gaik Tay
Chang Choon Chew, Chang Choon Chew
author_sort Waheed Ali Laghari, Waheed Ali Laghari
title Dorsal Hand Vein Pattern Recognition: A Comparison between Manual and Automatic Segmentation Methods
title_short Dorsal Hand Vein Pattern Recognition: A Comparison between Manual and Automatic Segmentation Methods
title_full Dorsal Hand Vein Pattern Recognition: A Comparison between Manual and Automatic Segmentation Methods
title_fullStr Dorsal Hand Vein Pattern Recognition: A Comparison between Manual and Automatic Segmentation Methods
title_full_unstemmed Dorsal Hand Vein Pattern Recognition: A Comparison between Manual and Automatic Segmentation Methods
title_sort dorsal hand vein pattern recognition: a comparison between manual and automatic segmentation methods
publisher HIR
publishDate 2023
url http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/9253/1/J16048_96765c3676a37ea9fa555805a2d79d35.pdf
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/9253/
https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2023.29.2.152
_version_ 1772813820301934592
score 13.18916