Economic and environmental life cycle perspectives on two engineered wood products: comparison of LVL and GLT construction materials
The embodied carbon of building materials and the energy consumed during construction have a signifcant impact on the environmental credentials of buildings. The structural systems of a building present opportunities to reduce environmental emissions and energy. In this regard, mass timber materials...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/8836/1/J15123_e7e3d93eda42d667017dba633b0ba48f.pdf http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/8836/ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24079-1 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The embodied carbon of building materials and the energy consumed during construction have a signifcant impact on the environmental credentials of buildings. The structural systems of a building present opportunities to reduce environmental emissions and energy. In this regard, mass timber materials have considerable potential as sustainable materials over other alternatives such as steel and concrete. The aim of this investigation was to compare the environment impact, energy consumption, and life cycle cost (LCC) of diferent wood-based materials in identical single-story residential buildings. The materials compared are laminated veneer lumber (LVL) and glued laminated timber (GLT). GLT has less global warming potential (GWP), ozone layer depletion (OLD), and land use (LU), respectively, by 29%, 37%, and 35% than LVL. Conversely, LVL generally has lower terrestrial acidifcation potential (TAP), human toxicity potential (HTP), and fossil depletion potential (FDP), respectively, by 30%, 17%, and 27%. The comparative outcomes revealed that using LVL reduces embodied
energy by 41%. To identify which of these materials is the best alternative, various environmental categories, embodied
energy, and cost criteria require further analysis. Therefore, the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method has been
applied to enable robust decision-making. The outcome showed that LVL manufacturing using softwood presents the most sustainable choice. These research fndings contribute to the body of knowledge about the use of mass timber in construction. |
|---|