Assessment of technology factor in companies’ business strategy with the use of sense and respond method
The focus of this paper is to propose a method for prioritizing knowledge and technology factor in companies’ business strategy. The data has been gathered and analyzed from Malaysian-owned company of medium size type industry, employing around 250 employees and listed in the Malaysian Bourse Stock...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Management and Production Engineering Review
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5243/1/AJ%202020%20%28112%29.pdf http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5243/ https://dx.doi.org/ 10.24425/mper.2019.129601 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.uthm.eprints.5243 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.uthm.eprints.52432022-01-06T07:47:41Z http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5243/ Assessment of technology factor in companies’ business strategy with the use of sense and respond method Tilabi, Sara Tasmin, Rosmaini Takala, Josu Muazu, M.H. A.H., Nor Aziati Shafiee, A.R. Kaprawi, Noraini Che Rusuli, M.S. T Technology (General) HD45-45.2 Technological innovations. Automation HD56-57.5 Industrial productivity The focus of this paper is to propose a method for prioritizing knowledge and technology factor in companies’ business strategy. The data has been gathered and analyzed from Malaysian-owned company of medium size type industry, employing around 250 employees and listed in the Malaysian Bourse Stock of Exchange, since 2000. Sense and respond model is used to determine competitive priorities of the firms. Then knowledge and technology part of sense and respond questionnaire is used to calculate the variability coefficient i.e. the uncertainty caused by technology and knowledge factor. The results show that the company is not leading in term of technology (spear head technology share is around 33%). Therefore, the enhancement of technology and knowledge to SCA values is not significantly seen in this study. The usage of the core technologies is around 41% and it might seem relatively enough. In terms of basic technology, while its share is the lowest (around 25%), it has the highest source of uncertainties among technology types. In this case, the proposed model helped to have a clear and precise improvement plan towards prioritizing technology and knowledge focus. Management and Production Engineering Review 2019 Article PeerReviewed text en http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5243/1/AJ%202020%20%28112%29.pdf Tilabi, Sara and Tasmin, Rosmaini and Takala, Josu and Muazu, M.H. and A.H., Nor Aziati and Shafiee, A.R. and Kaprawi, Noraini and Che Rusuli, M.S. (2019) Assessment of technology factor in companies’ business strategy with the use of sense and respond method. Management and Production Engineering Review, 10 (3). pp. 81-89. ISSN 20808208 https://dx.doi.org/ 10.24425/mper.2019.129601 |
institution |
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia |
building |
UTHM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia |
content_source |
UTHM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
T Technology (General) HD45-45.2 Technological innovations. Automation HD56-57.5 Industrial productivity |
spellingShingle |
T Technology (General) HD45-45.2 Technological innovations. Automation HD56-57.5 Industrial productivity Tilabi, Sara Tasmin, Rosmaini Takala, Josu Muazu, M.H. A.H., Nor Aziati Shafiee, A.R. Kaprawi, Noraini Che Rusuli, M.S. Assessment of technology factor in companies’ business strategy with the use of sense and respond method |
description |
The focus of this paper is to propose a method for prioritizing knowledge and technology factor in companies’ business strategy. The data has been gathered and analyzed from Malaysian-owned company of medium size type industry, employing around 250 employees and listed in the Malaysian Bourse Stock of Exchange, since 2000. Sense and respond model is used to determine competitive priorities of the firms. Then knowledge and technology part of sense and respond questionnaire is used to calculate the variability coefficient i.e. the uncertainty caused by technology and knowledge factor. The results show that the company is not leading in term of technology (spear head technology share is around 33%). Therefore, the enhancement of technology and knowledge to SCA values is not significantly seen in this study. The usage of the core technologies is around 41% and it might seem relatively enough. In terms of basic technology, while its share is the lowest (around 25%), it has the highest source of uncertainties among technology types. In this case, the proposed model helped to have a clear and precise improvement plan towards prioritizing technology and knowledge focus. |
format |
Article |
author |
Tilabi, Sara Tasmin, Rosmaini Takala, Josu Muazu, M.H. A.H., Nor Aziati Shafiee, A.R. Kaprawi, Noraini Che Rusuli, M.S. |
author_facet |
Tilabi, Sara Tasmin, Rosmaini Takala, Josu Muazu, M.H. A.H., Nor Aziati Shafiee, A.R. Kaprawi, Noraini Che Rusuli, M.S. |
author_sort |
Tilabi, Sara |
title |
Assessment of technology factor in companies’ business strategy with the use of sense and respond method |
title_short |
Assessment of technology factor in companies’ business strategy with the use of sense and respond method |
title_full |
Assessment of technology factor in companies’ business strategy with the use of sense and respond method |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of technology factor in companies’ business strategy with the use of sense and respond method |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of technology factor in companies’ business strategy with the use of sense and respond method |
title_sort |
assessment of technology factor in companies’ business strategy with the use of sense and respond method |
publisher |
Management and Production Engineering Review |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5243/1/AJ%202020%20%28112%29.pdf http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5243/ https://dx.doi.org/ 10.24425/mper.2019.129601 |
_version_ |
1738581355072061440 |
score |
13.18916 |