Effect of Buoyancy, Compressive Strength, and Shear Strength of Polyurethane-Clay Composite (PU-CC) Doped with Polyurethane Filler Waste in Soft Clay Application

The application of polyurethane waste as a filler is one of the most cost-effective strategies for enhancing the geotechnical properties in soils. The PU waste from manufacturing economies was prepared with alkaline solutions by submerging into a 0.05 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) before sieving to 300m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Atil, Aida Atiqah, Mat Hassan, Nik Normunira, Roseli, Adyla Illyana, Mohamed Yusop, Fatimah, Mohd Rus, Anika Zafiah, Marsi, Noraini, Tuan Ismail, Tuan Noor Hasanah, Yahya, Nur Faezah, Leman, Abdul Mutalib
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: semarak ilmu 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/10606/1/J16597_c02e46c1ab7d22965800dcef8ffbc736.pdf
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/10606/
https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.31.3.106114
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The application of polyurethane waste as a filler is one of the most cost-effective strategies for enhancing the geotechnical properties in soils. The PU waste from manufacturing economies was prepared with alkaline solutions by submerging into a 0.05 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) before sieving to 300m sizes. The PU waste as filler was prepared using two heat exposure from microwaves and drying ovens at 60°C and left for 3 hours. Then, the treated and untreated Polyurethane-Clay Composite (PU-CC) was prepared at the different ratios of PU waste filler (2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, and 10%). The physical properties of treated and untreated Polyurethane-Clay Composite (PU-CC) were examined utilizing buoyancy force, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), and direct shear strength, respectively. The result exhibited that the PU-CCTO has the highest buoyancy force at 10% of PU-CCTO10 samples at 50%, followed by 45% of PUCCTM10 and 8% of PU-CCUN2.5. The UCS and shear strength of PU-CCTO10 are evidently the highest at 300 kPa and 50 kPa, respectively, followed by PU-CCTM2.5 at 130 kPa and 19 kPa and PU-CCUN2.5 at 100 kPa and 15 kPa. PU-CCTO treated by drying oven has the highest buoyancy force at 10% of PU-CCTO10 samples at 50%, followed by 45% of PUCCTM10 treated by microwave, and the lowest at 2.5 wt% of PU-CCUN2.5 untreated at 8%. In a nutshell, the prospective PU-CCTO is superior to the PU-CCUN and PU-CCTM related of the potential for overheating and burning the PU filler powder during the microwave processing procedure. In conclusion, the 10 wt% of PU filler treated by the drying oven method as a PU clay composite has the potential as an alternative material to improve the compressive strength, shear strength, and buoyancy force in soil improvement.