Cooperative MIMO Communications in Wireless Sensor Networks

For most applications, sensor nodes rely solely on batteries for their power supply and hence battery depletion may have a great impact on the overall network performance. Consequently, most of the current research work in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is focusing on improving architectures and pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ahmad, Mohd Riduan
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Penerbit UTeM 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/3950/1/buku.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/3950/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utem.eprints.3950
record_format eprints
spelling my.utem.eprints.39502015-05-28T02:38:46Z http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/3950/ Cooperative MIMO Communications in Wireless Sensor Networks Ahmad, Mohd Riduan QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science For most applications, sensor nodes rely solely on batteries for their power supply and hence battery depletion may have a great impact on the overall network performance. Consequently, most of the current research work in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is focusing on improving architectures and protocols with energy conservation as the main focus. Instead of using a competing approach such as used in traditional wireless networks, sensor nodes are proposed to cooperate to achieve a common goal. Multiple sensor nodes can be used to transmit and receive cooperatively and such a configuration is known as a cooperative Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) system. Cooperative MIMO systems have been proved to reduce both transmission energy and latency in WSNs. However, most current work in WSNs considers only the energy cost for the data transmission component and neglects the energy component responsible for establishing a cooperative mechanism. When the energy cost of cooperative mechanism establishment is considered, the total energy consumed as a function of the increasing number of cooperating nodes becomes of particular interest. In addition, most of the previous work in WSNs focused only on Space-Time Block Coding (STBC) schemes and ignored other potential MIMO schemes. In this book, both transmission and circuit energies for both components are included in the performance models. Three major cooperative MIMO systems, namely Beamforming (BF), STBC and Spatial Multiplexing (SM) are compared and analysed. WSNs are assumed to operate in quasi-static Rayleigh fading channels with M cooperating transmit nodes and N cooperating receive nodes. The cooperative BF scheme outperforms both the cooperative SM and STBC schemes in terms of energy efficiency and packet latency for both synchronous and asynchronous scenarios. Synchronous scenarios assume perfect synchronisation between cooperating nodes. Also, the cooperative BF outperforms cooperative SM with higher diversity gain. A cooperative BF scheme with two transmit nodes is suggested as the optimal energy efficient cooperative MIMO system with the lowest packet latency when operating below 0.4Tb clock jitter difference and below 800mW radiated power in imperfect synchronisation scenarios. Tb is the bit period which corresponds to the system bit rate. In previous work all sensor nodes are assumed to be always on which could lead to a shorter lifetime due to energy wastage caused by idle listening and overhearing. Low duty cycle MAC protocols have been proposed to tackle this challenge in WSNs. However, most of the low duty cycle MAC protocols have been proposed for non-cooperative systems. In this book, a new cooperative low duty cycle MAC protocol (CMAC) is proposed for two cooperative MIMO schemes: Beamforming (CMACBF) and Spatial Multiplexing (CMACSM). Performance of the proposed CMAC protocol is evaluated in terms of total energy consumption and packet latency for both synchronous and asynchronous scenarios. All the required energy components are taken into consideration in the system performance modelling and a periodic monitoring application model is used. The impact of the clock jitter, the check interval and the number of cooperative nodes on the total energy consumption and latency is investigated. The CMACBF protocol with two transmit nodes is suggested as the optimal scheme when operating at the 250 ms check interval with the clock jitter difference below 0.6Tb. Penerbit UTeM 2009-12-01 Book PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/3950/1/buku.pdf Ahmad, Mohd Riduan (2009) Cooperative MIMO Communications in Wireless Sensor Networks. Penerbit UTeM, Melaka, Malaysia. ISBN 978-983-2948-70-4
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
building UTEM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
content_source UTEM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utem.edu.my/
language English
topic QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
spellingShingle QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Ahmad, Mohd Riduan
Cooperative MIMO Communications in Wireless Sensor Networks
description For most applications, sensor nodes rely solely on batteries for their power supply and hence battery depletion may have a great impact on the overall network performance. Consequently, most of the current research work in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is focusing on improving architectures and protocols with energy conservation as the main focus. Instead of using a competing approach such as used in traditional wireless networks, sensor nodes are proposed to cooperate to achieve a common goal. Multiple sensor nodes can be used to transmit and receive cooperatively and such a configuration is known as a cooperative Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) system. Cooperative MIMO systems have been proved to reduce both transmission energy and latency in WSNs. However, most current work in WSNs considers only the energy cost for the data transmission component and neglects the energy component responsible for establishing a cooperative mechanism. When the energy cost of cooperative mechanism establishment is considered, the total energy consumed as a function of the increasing number of cooperating nodes becomes of particular interest. In addition, most of the previous work in WSNs focused only on Space-Time Block Coding (STBC) schemes and ignored other potential MIMO schemes. In this book, both transmission and circuit energies for both components are included in the performance models. Three major cooperative MIMO systems, namely Beamforming (BF), STBC and Spatial Multiplexing (SM) are compared and analysed. WSNs are assumed to operate in quasi-static Rayleigh fading channels with M cooperating transmit nodes and N cooperating receive nodes. The cooperative BF scheme outperforms both the cooperative SM and STBC schemes in terms of energy efficiency and packet latency for both synchronous and asynchronous scenarios. Synchronous scenarios assume perfect synchronisation between cooperating nodes. Also, the cooperative BF outperforms cooperative SM with higher diversity gain. A cooperative BF scheme with two transmit nodes is suggested as the optimal energy efficient cooperative MIMO system with the lowest packet latency when operating below 0.4Tb clock jitter difference and below 800mW radiated power in imperfect synchronisation scenarios. Tb is the bit period which corresponds to the system bit rate. In previous work all sensor nodes are assumed to be always on which could lead to a shorter lifetime due to energy wastage caused by idle listening and overhearing. Low duty cycle MAC protocols have been proposed to tackle this challenge in WSNs. However, most of the low duty cycle MAC protocols have been proposed for non-cooperative systems. In this book, a new cooperative low duty cycle MAC protocol (CMAC) is proposed for two cooperative MIMO schemes: Beamforming (CMACBF) and Spatial Multiplexing (CMACSM). Performance of the proposed CMAC protocol is evaluated in terms of total energy consumption and packet latency for both synchronous and asynchronous scenarios. All the required energy components are taken into consideration in the system performance modelling and a periodic monitoring application model is used. The impact of the clock jitter, the check interval and the number of cooperative nodes on the total energy consumption and latency is investigated. The CMACBF protocol with two transmit nodes is suggested as the optimal scheme when operating at the 250 ms check interval with the clock jitter difference below 0.6Tb.
format Book
author Ahmad, Mohd Riduan
author_facet Ahmad, Mohd Riduan
author_sort Ahmad, Mohd Riduan
title Cooperative MIMO Communications in Wireless Sensor Networks
title_short Cooperative MIMO Communications in Wireless Sensor Networks
title_full Cooperative MIMO Communications in Wireless Sensor Networks
title_fullStr Cooperative MIMO Communications in Wireless Sensor Networks
title_full_unstemmed Cooperative MIMO Communications in Wireless Sensor Networks
title_sort cooperative mimo communications in wireless sensor networks
publisher Penerbit UTeM
publishDate 2009
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/3950/1/buku.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/3950/
_version_ 1665905266068029440
score 13.2014675